短葶山麦冬种群分类问题的探讨

中国科学院大学学报

短葶山麦冬种群分类问题的探讨

徐炳声, 李林初

(复且大学生物系)

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:1981-11-18 发布日期:1981-11-18
通讯作者: 徐炳声

Critical notes on the classification of the Liriope muscari complex

Hsu Ping-Sheng, Li Lin-Chu

(Department of Biology, Fudan University)

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:1981-11-18 Published:1981-11-18
Contact: Hsu Ping-Sheng

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

The presence of stolons is taxonomically significant in the genus Liriope Linn.

However, probably due to a lapse of attention, F. T. Wang and T. Tang failed to re-

cognize Ophiopogon muscari Decne., type of Liriope muscari (Decne.) Bailey, a non-

stoloniferous taxon, and erroneously referred it as a synonym to the stoloniferous L.

spicata Lour. At the same time, however, they described another non-stoloniferous

species-L. platyphylla Wang et Tang (L. muscari Bailey) as new.

What, then, is the difference between L. platyphylla Wang et Tang and L. mus-

cari (Decne.) Bailey? A comparison of the type photo of Ophiopogon muscari Decne.

with specimens of L. platyphylla Wang et Tang shows that the two forms are much alike,

but the latter has longer scapes usually overtopping the foliage, as well as longer spikes

and broader leaves. L. H. Bailey must had combined the two forms into one species.

Furthermore. there are another two non-stoloniferous forms, both having scapes shorter

than their foliage, but differing from L. muscari (Decne.) Bailey in their much nar-

rower leaves. One of them has very short leaves and looks like L. minor Makino.

Finally, what are the correlations among the above four forms? By using methods

of quantitative analysis, such as pictorialized scatter diagram and histogram, on her-

barium material, it has been found that the L. muscari complex can be separated into

two parts: 1) muscari (M), and 2) platyphylla (P). But since these two parts dis-

play a continuous variation pattern as a whole, it seems advisable to treat both as varie-

ties of the same species, i. e., L. muscari (Decne.) Bailey var. muscari, and L. muscari

var. communis (Maxim.) Hsu et L. C. Li. (Ophiopogon spicatus Ker-Cawl. var. com-

munis Maxim.) As to the other two narrow-leaved forms, they can hardly be regarded

as sufficient for two distinct infraspecific units, for they are found to be inseparable

from each other as well as from muscari.

徐炳声, 李林初. 短葶山麦冬种群分类问题的探讨[J]. 中国科学院大学学报.

Hsu Ping-Sheng, Li Lin-Chu. Critical notes on the classification of the Liriope muscari complex[J]. .