论交让木科的系统位置

中国科学院大学学报

论交让木科的系统位置

张志耘, 路安民

(中国科学院植物研究所系统与进化植物学开放研究实验室)

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:1989-01-10 发布日期:1989-01-10
通讯作者: 张志耘

On the Systematic Position of Daphniphyllaceae

Zhang Zhi-Yun, Lu An-Ming

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:1989-01-10 Published:1989-01-10
Contact: Zhang Zhi-Yun

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文借助光学显微镜和扫描电镜，对国产交让术科10个种的气孔和花粉形态及金缕梅科和黄杨科一些代表种的花粉形态进行了观察，并据大戟科已有资料，较系统地从形态学、解剖学、孢粉学、胚胎学以及化学成分等方面讨论交让木科的系统位置。

关键词: 交让木科, 气孔, 花粉形态, 系统位置

Abstract:

The present paper deals with the systematic position of Daphniphyllaceae. The

genus Daphniphyllum was first described by Blume in 1826 as a member of Rhamnaceae. In

1858 Baillon removed it to the tribe Phyllantheae of Euphorbiaceae, while Müller (1869) raised

this genus to the rank of family, Daphniphyllaceae. Although Müller’s treatment has been ac-

cepted by most botanists, including the present authors, its systematic position has been debated.

The first aim in our studies on the cladistics of Hamamelidae is to answer the question

which families should be included in this monophyletic group. By observing their pollen gr-

ains and stoma types of some representative species of Daphniphyllaceae, Hamamelidaceae and

Buxaceae under light microscope (LM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM,) and analy-

sing morphological, anatomical, palynological, embryological characters and chemical compone-

nts in the three taxa and Euphorbiaceae, we find that Daphniphyllaceae is very similar to Ha-

mamelidaceae, but greatly different from Euphorbiaceae, in inflorescence racemose or spicate,

calyx nearly reduced, stamens numerous and sometimes synandry, connective usually exserted,

disc absent, carpels 2; vessel with scalariform perforation plates and often not spiral-thickened,

fiber bordered-pitted; stomata mostly paracytic; pollen 3-colpate; tapetum glandular, endosperm

development cellular, obturator and caruncle absent; iridoid compounds present; sieve-element

plastids S-type.

The present authors have noticed the fact that Daphniphyllaceae is also similar to Mag-

noliaceae in the stamens numerous, anthers larger and filaments very short, connectives obvi-

ously exserted and with several bundles; anther wall thicker, endosperm development cellular, em-

bryo small. It is considered that not only are Daphniphyllaceae and Hamamelidaceae phene-

tically close to each other but also much possibly derived from a common ancestor, the extinct

group of Magnoliales. However, Daphniphyllaceae appears to be remote from Euphorbiaceae

and Buxaceae in relationship and should be separated from Euphorbiales and Buxales. Mean-

while, since Daphniphyllaceae differs from the members of Hamamelidales in the incompletely

septate ovary, drupaceous fruit, indistinct sexine sculpture of pollen grains, small embryo, and

an unique alkaloid, daphniphylline, but lacking proanthacyanins, the establishment of an order,

Daphniphyllales, for the family, is considered reasonable. According to our opinion, the

order is related to Hamamelidales rather than to Euphorbiales as originally suggested by Huru-

sawa (1954).

Key words: Daphniphyllaceae, Stoma, Pollen morphology, Systematic position

张志耘, 路安民. 论交让木科的系统位置[J]. 中国科学院大学学报.

[1]	张宪春, 刘全儒, 徐静. 宽带蕨属（水龙骨科）的系统学研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2003, 41(5): 401-415.
[2]	王伟,赵南先. 中国天南星科花粉形态的研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2002, 40(6): 517-529.
[3]	孙坤,陈家宽,张志耘. 水鳖科9属15种植物花粉形态的研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2002, 40(6): 490-500.
[4]	刘家熙,张玉龙,宁建长,赵云云,李雅轩,张静梅,孙晓红. 中国紫草科紫草亚科琉璃草族花粉形态的研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2001, 39(6): 515-522.
[5]	张文蘅,陈之端,陈虎彪,汤彦承. 从叶绿体DNA trnL-F序列论双参属的归属问题[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2001, 39(4): 337-344.
[6]	李维林,贺善安,顾姻,舒璞,濮祖茂. 中国悬钩子属花粉形态观察[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2001, 39(3): 234-247.
[7]	. 《中国科学院研究生院学报》征稿简则[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2001, 18(1): 11-11.
[8]	周其兴,顾志建,岳中枢. 穗花杉属的核形态及其系统位置的探讨[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2000, 38(6): 522-527.
[9]	孙成仁. 五味子科植物花粉形态及其系统学意义[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2000, 38(5): 437-445.
[10]	杨亲二. 二倍体铁破锣的核型及四倍体细胞型的首次发现[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1999, 37(1): 1-9.
[11]	刘成刚,胡玉熹,林金星. 棕榈藤茎的表皮特征及其分类意义[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1998, 36(6): 503-510.
[12]	席以珍,郎楷永,胡玉熹. 中国兜被兰属植物的花粉形态及其分类意义[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1998, 36(6): 496-502.
[13]	俸宇星,汪小全,潘开玉,洪德元. rbc L基因序列分析对连香树科和交让木科系统位置的重新评价——兼论低等金缕梅类的关系[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1998, 36(5): 411-422.
[14]	王萍莉,溥发鼎,郑中华. 三棱栎属分类的孢粉学证据[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1998, 36(3): 238-241.
[15]	陈世龙, 何廷农, 洪德元. 翼萼蔓属系统位置的研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1998, 36(1): 58-68.