Elymus sibiricus, E. nutans 和 E. burchan-buddae 的形态学鉴定及其染色体组亲缘关系的研究

中国科学院大学学报

Elymus sibiricus, E. nutans 和 E. burchan-buddae 的形态学鉴定及其染色体组亲缘关系的研究

卢宝荣

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:1994-11-18 发布日期:1994-11-18
通讯作者: 卢宝荣

Morphological Identification of Elymus sibiricus, E. nutans, and E. burchan-buddae, and Their Genomic Relationships

Lu Bao-rong

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:1994-11-18 Published:1994-11-18
Contact: Lu Bao-rong

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了进一步研究Elymus sibiricus L.、E．nutans Griseb．和E．burchan-buddae(Neuski)Tzelev

[＝Roegneria nutans(Keng)Keng]的外部形态差异及其系统学关系，本文对这三种植物的6个穗部形

态性状进行了观测和比较，并对这三个Elymus种进行了种间杂交及杂种F1的减数分裂染色体配对行

为的分析研究。结果表明：这三个Elymus种的穗长及颖长等性状均变异很大，而内稃的长、宽则变异

不大并具有明显的种间差异。E. nutans×E．barchan-buddae及E.nutans×E．sibiricus的杂种F1均完

全不育，减数分裂不规则。E．nutans×E．burchan-buddae杂种F1的减数分裂构型为：7.70I+13.40

Ⅱ+0.06Ⅲ+O.08 Ⅳ，而E．sibiricus×E．nutans杂种F1的构型为11.98 Ⅰ+9.61Ⅱ+O.64Ⅲ+0.39

Ⅳ+0.01V。由本实验的形态学和细胞学的研究结果得出以下结论：1．利用内稃形态性状结合穗部

其它性状的差异能对这三个物种进行较准确的鉴定；2．E．nutans与E.burchan-buddae的亲缘关系较

近，而E．nutans与E．sibiricus的亲缘关系则较远；3. E，burchan-buddae×E．nutans的杂种Fl中存

在着染色体配对控制因子。

关键词: 小麦族, 披碱草属, 形态变异, 染色体组分析, 物种关系

Abstract:

In order to investigate morphological variations of Elymus sibiricus L., E. nutans

Griseb., and E. burchan-buddae (Nevski) Tzvelev ［=Roegneria nutans (Keng) Keng］,

and to explore their systematic relationships, six morphological characters were measured

and compared between the Elymus species. Interspecific hybridizations between E. nutans

and E. sibiricus, and E. burchan-buddae were carried out with the aid of embryo rescue.

Chromosome pairing behaviour was also analysed at metaphase- I of meiosis in pollen moth-

er cells of F₁ hybrids. Morphologic characters, such as length of spikes and length of glumes

varied considerably between different individuals of each species, whereas length and width

of paleas were quite stable and different between species. The interspecific hybrids were com-

pletely sterile and their meioses were irregular. Meiotic configuration of E. nutans × E. bur-

chan-buddae was 7.70I +13.40Ⅱ+0.06Ⅲ+0.08 IV, whereas that of E. sibircus×E.

nutans was 11.98I+9.61Ⅱ+0.64Ⅲ+0.39Ⅳ+0.01V. It is concluded from the mor-

phological and cytological study that (1) it is possible to identify the three Elymus species

using the palea character, in addition to other traditionally applied characters; (2) Elymus

nutans and E. burchan-buddae have a comparatively high genomie relationship, while E. nu-

tans and E. sibircus have a relatively low genomic affinity to one another; and (3) a certain

chromosome pairing regulator was presented in the hybrid between E. burchan-buddae and

E. nutans.

Key words: Triticeae, Elymus, morphological variation, genomic analysis, species relationship

卢宝荣. Elymus sibiricus, E. nutans 和 E. burchan-buddae 的形态学鉴定及其染色体组亲缘关系的研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报.

Lu Bao-rong. Morphological Identification of Elymus sibiricus, E. nutans, and E. burchan-buddae, and Their Genomic Relationships[J]. .

[1]	韩友吉; 陈桂琛; 周国英; 孙菁; 李锦萍. 青海湖地区高寒草原植物个体特征对放牧的响应[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2006, 23(1): 118-124.
[2]	卢宝荣. 披碱草属(Elymus L.)两个物种之订正[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2002, 40(6): 539-545.
[3]	周永红,郑有良,杨俊良,颜济,贾继增. 10种披碱草属植物的RAPD分析及其系统学意义[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1999, 37(5): 425-432.
[4]	张新全,杨俊良,颜济,郑有良,伍碧华. 青海仲彬草和黑药仲彬草的生物系统学研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1999, 37(2): 117-124.
[5]	张志耘, 卢宝荣, 温洁. 稻属叶表皮结构特征及其系统学意义[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1998, 36(1): 8-18.
[6]	卢宝荣. 披碱草属与大麦属系统关系的研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1997, 35(3): 193-207.
[7]	孙根楼, 杨俊良, 颜济. 华山新麦草和鹅观草属两个种间物种生物学研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1993, 31(5): 393-398.
[8]	汪劲武, 杨继, 李懋学. 野菊和甘菊的形态变异及其核型特征[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1993, 31(2): 140-146.
[9]	孙义凯,赵毓棠,董玉琛,周荣华,许树军. 东北地区小麦族11种植物的核型报道[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1992, 30(4): 342-345.
[10]	时英, 郭本兆, 李建华. 披碱草属6种植物的核型研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1989, 27(3): 215-221.
[11]	汪劲武, 杨继, 李懋学. 玉竹复合体的分类研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1988, 26(3): 165-172.
[12]	郭本兆, 王世金, 李健华. 我国小麦族的形态演化与分类、分布的研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1985, 23(3): 161-169.