茶树细胞分类学研究

中国科学院大学学报

茶树细胞分类学研究

梁国鲁, 林蒙嘉, 陈家玉, 刘君素

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:1992-11-10 发布日期:1992-11-10
通讯作者: 梁国鲁

Cytotaxonomical Studies of Tea Plants

Liang Guo-Lu, Lin Meng-Jia, Chen Jia-Yu, Liu Jun-Su

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:1992-11-10 Published:1992-11-10
Contact: Liang Guo-Lu

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文研究了黔、滇、川、闽茶树Camellia Sinensis(L)Kuntze 9个类型的核型。染色体数目均为2n=30。9个茶树类型可分为两类：第一类包括乔木大叶类的贵州大叶茶，云南大叶茶及云南腾冲大叶茶，其核型均为”2A”型。第二类属于灌木或小乔木类，以中小叶为主，少数为大叶的黔湄419，黔湄502雅安大叶茶，福鼎大白茶，川茶及黔湄101，核型属”2A”和”2B”，不对称性略高于第一类，为较进化的核型。从核型资料支持将茶C.sinensis分为两个亚种，同时也赞同以云贵高原为中心的茶树起源观点。

关键词: 茶树, 核型, 进化, 细胞学分类

Abstract:

Nine forms of Camellia sinensis (L) Kuntze from Guizhou, Yunnan,

Sichuan and Fujian Provinces were cytotaxonomically studied in this work. The

wall degradation hypotonic method was used for preparing chromosome samples

which were stained in Giemsa. The micrographs of their somatic metaphase

are shown in Plates 1-2, the ranges of chromosome relative lengths, arm ratios,

karyotype formulae and classification of karyotypes according to Li and

Chen (1985) are shown in Table 1 and the idiograms in Fig. l. The main points

are mentioned as follows:

(1) All these forms are found to be diploid with 2n = 30, and they are reported

for the first time except Yunnan(Fengqing)cultivated form.

(2) All the karyotypes of the forms examined are relatively uniform, which re-

veal the gradual decrease in size from the longest to the shortest chromosomes,

similar chromosomal relative length, smaller chromosome types varying between

2- 5μm. The karyotype mainly consists of metacentric (m) and submeta-

centric (sm) chromosomes. Sat-chromosomes are difficult to be discovered

on mid -metaphase chromosomes. The cytological information confirms the close

relationship among these tea forms.

(3) According to the asymmetry of karyotype, the nine tea forms are divided

into two types: one consists of the arbor with macrophyll, i.e. Guizhou and

Yunnan( Fengqing and Tengchong)cultivated forms, which have the”2A”

karyotype possessing metacentric(m) and submetacentric(sm) chromosomes. The

karyotypes might be of the most symmetrical or primitive type ;the other consists of

the bush or microarbor with mostly medium- and microphyll, less frequently

macrophyll, i.e. Qianmei 419, Qianmei 502, Yaan,Fuding, Sichuan and Qianmei

101 cultivated forms, which have the “2A” and “2B” karyotypes, consisting of

metacentric (m), submetacentric (sm) and a pair of subtelocentric (st)

chromosomes, and more asymmetrical than that of the first karyotype. They

might be more advanced.

(4) In recent years, two subspecies, i.e. ssp. “yunnan”and ssp. “bohea”,

including seven varieties, in C. sinensis were recognized but not formally published

by Zhuang et al. (1981). From the present work and the previous reports the au-

thors agree with Zhuang’s classification, because recognition of two subspecies is re-

markably consistent with the two kinds of karyotypes reported here. C.sinensis ssp.

“yunnan” with arbor and macrophyll characters has more symmetrical karyotype

than that of C. sinensis ssp. “bohea” with bush or microarbor and mostly medium-

and microphyll characters. That is to say, ssp.”yunnan” is more primitive than

ssp. “bohea”.

(5) Based on the karyotype analysis of arbor and macrophyll teas reported

before and here (see Table 3), the authors support the viewpoint that Yunnan-

Gui zhou Plateau is the original center of tea Plants, whereas Assam form in In-

dia is derived.

Key words: Tea, Karyotype, Evolutin, Cytotaxonomy

梁国鲁, 林蒙嘉, 陈家玉, 刘君素. 茶树细胞分类学研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报.

Liang Guo-Lu, Lin Meng-Jia, Chen Jia-Yu, Liu Jun-Su. Cytotaxonomical Studies of Tea Plants[J]. .

[1]	徐丽凡, 王雄. 一种基于差分算法的共形聚焦式微波热疗系统[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2020, 37(5): 708-713.
[2]	桑睿, 吴杰, 许华, 郭强. 基于改进的遗传算法的后非线性盲源分离[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2012, 29(5): 707-713.
[3]	谢珍玉, 郑成木. 中国海南岛13种菊科植物的细胞学研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2003, 41(6): 545-552.
[4]	刘爱华, 王建波, 朱英国. 芸薹属多倍体植物基因组进化的RAPD分析[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2003, 41(6): 520-530.
[5]	季祥彪, 叶能干. 双子叶植物幼苗类型及其可能的演化关系[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2003, 41(5): 447-464.
[6]	杨亲二. 国产毛茛科银莲花族十七种植物的细胞学研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2002, 40(5): 396-405.
[7]	李玉阁,郭卫红,吴伯骥. 国产七种和一变种兰属植物的核型研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2002, 40(5): 406-413.
[8]	杨亲二. 国产12种乌头属和18种翠雀属植物的细胞学研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2001, 39(6): 502-514.
[9]	杨亲二. 国产毛茛属11种及其4个近缘属5种植物的细胞学研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2001, 39(5): 405-422.
[10]	何兴金,许介眉. 中国葱属单生组4种植物的核型研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2001, 39(5): 423-432.
[11]	杨继. 植物多倍体基因组的形成与进化[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2001, 39(4): 357-372.
[12]	杨亲二. 云南西北部毛茛属一新种——文采毛茛及其核型[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2000, 38(6): 551-556.
[13]	王超,王建波,施苏华,钟扬. 山羊草属异源多倍体物种核rDNA ITS区的进化[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2000, 38(3): 211-217.
[14]	孔宏智,刘建全. 中国特有属——羽叶点地梅属的细胞学研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1999, 37(5): 445-450.
[15]	王彦红, 马金双, 刘全儒. 八种国产大戟属植物的核型报道[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1999, 37(4): 394-402.