欢迎访问中国科学院大学学报,今天是
简报

Huynen类型目标分解方法的比较与分析

  • 王春乐 ,
  • 禹卫东
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院电子学研究所, 北京 100190;
    2. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049

收稿日期: 2010-05-21

  修回日期: 2010-09-25

  网络出版日期: 2011-05-15

基金资助

中国科学院知识创新项目(0613120241)资助 

Comparative analyses of Huynen target decomposition methods

  • WANG Chun-Le ,
  • YU Wei-Dong
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
    2. Graduate University, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2010-05-21

  Revised date: 2010-09-25

  Online published: 2011-05-15

摘要

详细地分析了Huynen目标分解方法的基本理论.简要介绍Barnes-Holm目标分解与Yang目标分解的基本原理,强调这2种方法对Huynen目标分解的补充与改进.最后将3种目标分解方法应用于实际数据,分析其应用效果,提出方法的优点与不足.

本文引用格式

王春乐 , 禹卫东 . Huynen类型目标分解方法的比较与分析[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2011 , 28(3) : 402 -409 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2011.3.019

Abstract

We analyze the basic theory of Huynen target decomposition methods. We also analyze the basic concepts of Barnes-Holm decomposition and Yang decomposition and emphasize their complementarity and improvement to the original Huynen target decomposition. Finally, the practical polarimetric data sets are used to examine the three target decomposition methods and the advantages and disadvantages of the three methods are analyzed.

参考文献


[1] Huynen J R. Phenomenological theory of radar targets . Rotterdam: Drukkerij Bronder-offset N V, 1970.

[2] Huynen J R. The calculation and measurement of surface-torsion by radar: Report No 102, P Q Research . California: Los Altos Hills, 1988.

[3] Huynen J R. A revisitation of the phenomenological approach with applications to radar target decomposition: University of Illinois at Chicago, research report EMID-CL-82-05-08-01, Contractno . NAV-AIR-N00019-BO-C-0620, 1982.

[4] Huynen J R. The Stokes matrix parameters and their interpretation in terms of physical target properties //Journées Internationales de la Polarimétrie Radar–J I P R 90, IRESTE. Nantes, 1990.

[5] Pottier E. On Dr J R. Huynen’s main contributions in the development of polarimetric radar technique //Proceedings SPIE. 1992, 1748: 72-85.

[6] Huynen J R. Extraction of target significant parameters from polarimetric data . Los Altos Hills, California, 1989.

[7] Holm W A, Barnes R M. On radar polarization mixed state decomposition theorems //Proceedings 1988 USA National Radar Conference. 1988.

[8] Barnes R M. Roll-invariant decompositions for the polarization covariance matrix //Polarimetry Technology Workshop. Redstone Arsenal, AL, 1988.

[9] Yang J, Peng Y N, Yamaguchi Y, et al. On Huynen’s decomposition of a Kennaugh matrix
[J]. IEEE GRS Letters, 2006,3(3): 369-372.

[10] Touzi R, Deschamps A, Demers A M, et al. The Touzi decomposition for wetland classification using polarimetric C-band SAR //Proc POLInSAR. 2009: 26-30.

[11] Margarit G, Mallorqui J J. Scattering-based model of the SAR signatures of complex targets for classification applications
[J]. Int J Navig Observ, 2008, 426267:1-11.

[12] Lee J S. Eric pottier, polarimetric radar imaging-from basics to application
[M]. CRC Press, 2009.

[13] Cloude S R, Pottier E. A review of target decomposition theorems in radar polarimetry
[J]. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing, 1996, 34: 498-518.

[14] Bombrun L, Beaulieu J M. Fisher distribution for texture modeling of polarimetric SAR data
[J]. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett, 2008, 5(3): 512-516.

[15] Touzi R, Deschamps A, Rother G. Phase of target scattering for wetland characterization using polarimetric C-band SAR
[J]. IEEE Trans Geoscience Rem Sens, 2009,47(9):3241-3261.

文章导航

/