欢迎访问中国科学院大学学报,今天是
论文

基于主观逻辑扩展的实体行为动态可信模型

  • 杨晓晖 ,
  • 赵鹏远 ,
  • 石强 ,
  • 田俊峰
展开
  • 河北大学数学与计算机学院,河北保定 071002

收稿日期: 2010-06-23

  修回日期: 2010-09-06

  网络出版日期: 2011-11-15

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(60873203)、河北省自然科学基金(F2010000325,F2010000304)资助 

Dynamic trusted evaluation model of entity behavior based on extended subjective logic

  • YANG Xiao-Hui ,
  • ZHAO Peng-Yuan ,
  • SHI Qiang ,
  • TIAN Jun-Feng
Expand
  • College of Math and Computer Science, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China

Received date: 2010-06-23

  Revised date: 2010-09-06

  Online published: 2011-11-15

摘要

从实体行为可信性的主观角度出发,针对传统主观逻辑理论没有考虑主观评测结果随时间动态变化的问题,提出对主观逻辑理论进行动态化多维扩展的思想,将传统的二维观点空间扩展为多维动态观点空间.在综合考虑实体行为的声誉和风险的基础上构建起实体可信度评价体系,提出一个基于主观逻辑扩展的实体行为动态可信评测模型.实验结果表明,该模型对实体恶意行为的反应更加灵敏,检测更加准确,抑制更加有效.

本文引用格式

杨晓晖 , 赵鹏远 , 石强 , 田俊峰 . 基于主观逻辑扩展的实体行为动态可信模型[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2011 , 28(6) : 818 -825 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2011.6.017

Abstract

The traditional theory of subjective logic does not consider the fact that subjective evaluation results change with time. We present a new idea to extend traditional subjective logic theory. The traditional two-dimensional opinion space is extended to a multi-dimensional dynamic opinion space. A dynamic trusted evaluation model of entity behavior based on extended subjective logic is proposed and is implemented based on the reputation and risk evaluation mechanism. The experimental results show that the model can process malicious behavior with more sensitive reaction, more accurate detection, and more effective suppression.

参考文献


[1] Huang C L, Hu H P, Wang Z Y. Balancing risk and trust in trust-based decision making
[J]. Computer Engineering & Science, 2007, 29(4):31-35(in Chinese). 黄辰林,胡华平,王志英. 一种面向可信决策的风险信任平衡模型研究
[J]. 计算机工程与科学, 2007, 29(4):31-35.

[2] Liu B D. Uncertainty theory //Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2007,154: 205-234.

[3] Huang C L, Hu H P, Wang Z Y. Extension of subjective logic for time-related trust
[J]. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2005, 10(1): 56-60.

[4] Husserl E. Formal and transcendental logic
[M]. Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1969.

[5] Jsang A. Prospectives for modelling trust in information security //Proceedings of the 2nd Australasian Conference on information Security and Privacy. London, UK: Springer-Verlag, 1997:2-13.

[6] Jsang A. A subjective metric of authentication //Proceedings of the 5th European Symposium on Research in Computer Security. London, UK: Springer-Verlag, 1998:329-344.

[7] Shafer G. Perspectives on the theory and practice of belief functions
[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1990, 4(5/6): 323-362.

[8] Huberman B A, Wu F. The dynamics of reputations
[J]. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2004 (4): 6-22.

[9] Jesi G P. PeerSim: a peer-to-peer simulator . USA: Source Forge. (2009-03-10) . http://peersim.sourceforge.net/.

[10] KamvarS D, Schlosser M T, Molina H G. EigenRep: reputation management in P2P networks //Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference. Budapest, Hungary: ACM Press, 2003:123-134.

文章导航

/