欢迎访问中国科学院大学学报,今天是
计算机科学

不完美信息扩展博弈下的理性秘密共享协议

  • 孙富玲 ,
  • 周展飞 ,
  • 俞扬
展开
  • 中国科学院信息工程研究所信息安全国家重点实验室, 北京 100195

收稿日期: 2012-09-24

  修回日期: 2013-01-07

  网络出版日期: 2013-07-15

基金资助

国家重点实验室基金(Y1Z0081102)资助 

Rational secret sharing protocol in the context of extensive game with imperfect information

  • SUN Fu-Ling ,
  • ZHOU Zhan-Fei ,
  • YU Yang
Expand
  • State Key Laboratory of Information Security, Institute of Information Engineering, China Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100195, China

Received date: 2012-09-24

  Revised date: 2013-01-07

  Online published: 2013-07-15

摘要

主要研究理性秘密共享协议过程中,由于参与者的序贯行动所引起的不可置信威胁的问题. 给出一个更加通用的满足计算k-resilient纳什均衡的(m,n)理性秘密共享协议(k<m), 该协议可以消除不可置信威胁.与之前协议不同的是, 当有参与者背离时,其他人并不选择中断协议,而是对背离者进行连续足够轮数的惩罚. 在这个协议中,子秘密的更新并不需要在线分发者,而是通过参与者协商随机数来进行更新.

本文引用格式

孙富玲 , 周展飞 , 俞扬 . 不完美信息扩展博弈下的理性秘密共享协议[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2013 , 30(4) : 539 -546 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2013.04.016

Abstract

We investigate the incredible threat issue caused by players' sequential actions in a rational secret sharing protocol. We propose a general rational secret sharing protocol satisfying k-resilient (m,n) Nash equilibrium which eliminates incredible threat. In our protocol, when some player deviates from the equilibrium, other players do not choose to abort but instead they continuously punish the deviator in enough runs. We do not need online distributor in our protocol but instead we use the negotiated random numbers by participants to update shares.

参考文献

[1] Halpern J, Teague V. Rational secret sharing and multiparty computation[C]//Babai. Proceedings of the Thirty-sixth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. Chicago:ACM, 2004:623-632.

[2] Gordon S, Katz J. Rational secret sharing, revisited[C]//Roberto D P, Moti Y. Security and Cryptography for Networks. Maiori:Springer, 2006:229-241.

[3] Abraham I, Dolev D, Gonen R, et al. Distributed computing meets game theory: robust mechanisms for rational secret sharing and multiparty computation[C]//Ruppert. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing. Denver: ACM, 2006: 53-62.

[4] Lepinski M, Micali S, Peikert C, et al. Completely fair SFE and coalition-safe cheap talk[C]//Chaudhuri. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing. Newfoundland:ACM, 2004: 1-10.

[5] Izmalkov S, Micali S, Lepinski M. Rational secure computation and ideal mechanism design[C]//46th Annual IEEE Symposium on. Foundations of Computer Science. Pittsburgh: IEEE, 2005:585-594.

[6] Kol G, Naor M. Cryptography and game theory: Designing protocols for exchanging information[C]//Ran C. Theory of Cryptography.New York: Springer,2008:320-339.

[7] Kreps D M, Wilson R. Sequential equilibria[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,1982, 50: 863-894.

[8] Zhang Z, Liu M L. Rational secret sharing as extensive games[J]. Science China Information Sciences,2010: 1-13.

[9] Herzberg A, Jarecki S, Krawczyk H, et al. Proactive secret sharing or: How to cope with perpetual leakage[C]//Advances in Cryptology-CRYPT0'95. Berlin:Springer, 1995: 339-352.

[10] Shamir A. How to share a secret[J]. Communications of the ACM,1979, 22(11): 612-613.

[11] Osborne M J, Rubinstein A. A course in game theory[M]. Cambridge: the MIT Press, 1994.

[12] Pedersen T. Non-interactive and information-theoretic secure verifiable secret sharing[C]//Feigenbaum J. Advances in Cryptology-CRYPTO'91. Berlin: Springer, 1992:129-140.

[13] Hendon E, Jacobsen H J, Sloth B. The one-shot-deviation principle for sequential rationality[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 1996, 12(2): 274-282.

文章导航

/