欢迎访问中国科学院大学学报,今天是
综述

用皮尔逊检验分析年度地震趋势预测结果

  • 史勇军 ,
  • 吴忠良 ,
  • 白玲
展开
  • 1. 中国科学技术大学地球和空间科学学院, 合肥 230026;
    2. 中国科学院研究生院地球系统科学中心, 北京 100039;
    3. 中国地震局地球物理研究所, 北京 100081;
    4. 喀什地震台, 新疆 844000

收稿日期: 2003-06-06

  网络出版日期: 2004-03-19

Evaluation of Annual Prediction of Seismicity Tendency Using Pearson Test

  • SHI Yong-Jun ,
  • WU Zhong-Liang ,
  • BAI Ling
Expand
  • 1. College of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China;
    2. Center for Earth System Science, Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China;
    3. Institute of Geophysics, China Seismological Bureau, Beijing 100081, China;
    4. Kashi Standard Seismological Observatory, Xinjiang 844000, China

Received date: 2003-06-06

  Online published: 2004-03-19

摘要

使用皮尔逊检验方法,考虑不同地区的地震活动背景概率和地震及前兆监测能力的差异,除去监测能力很低的青藏高原地区,将中国大陆地区分成东部、西部、川滇等 3个区域,分别进行年度地震趋势预测效果的检验.所得结果具有不同的特点,其中东部地区的概率增益和皮尔逊检验的置信水平明显高于另外 2个地区,表明在现有的年度地震趋势预测中,对地震活动性的认识仍占有相当重要的地位.

本文引用格式

史勇军 , 吴忠良 , 白玲 . 用皮尔逊检验分析年度地震趋势预测结果[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2004 , 21(2) : 248 -253 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2004.2.015

Abstract

Pearson test is applied to the evaluation of the annual prediction of seismicity tendency carried out inChina from 1990 to 2002. Considering the regional difference of seismicity and level of seismological Pgeophysical monitoring, we divide the Chinese mainland into four sub regions : the east, the west, the Yunnan Sichuan region,and Tibetan plateau, in which Tibetan plateau is with extremely-low monitoring capability and is not considered inthe evaluation. It is observed that the three regions, the east, the west, and the Yunnan Sichuan region, have different characteristics. The average probability gain and confidence level for the east is significantly higher than thoseof the west and the Yunnan Sichuan region. The result also shows that in the annual prediction of seismicity tendency carried out at present, the statistics of seismic activity, such as the background probability of earthquakes, playsthe most important role.

参考文献

[1] 石耀霖,刘 杰,张国民.对中国90 年代年度地震预报的评估.中国科学院研究生院学报,2000,17 (1) :63-67

[2] 郑兆,刘 杰,李 罡,钱家栋,汪雪泉.中国年度地震重点危险区与地震相关性的统计模拟分析.地震学报,2000,22 (5) :538-546

[3] 张国民,刘 杰,石耀霖.年度地震预报能力的科学评价.地震学报,2002,24 (5) :525-532

[4] 章景德,高富荣,郑祖光.气象统计预报基础.北京:气象出版社,1995

[5] 张天中,王林英,刘庆芳,丁秋琴.条件概率法在地震预测指标判别中的应用.地震地磁观测与研究,1999,20 (1) :138-140

[6] 张天中,王林英,刘庆芳,丁秋琴.概率方法应用于地震短期预测的探索.地震,1999,19 (2) :135-141

[7] 张晓庭,陈汉峰.贝叶斯统计推断.北京:科学出版社,1994

[8] Vere2Jones D.Forecasting earthquakes and earthquake risk.International Journal of Forecasting,1995, 11 :503-538

[9] Kagan Y Y, Jackson D D.Probabilistic forecasting of earthquakes.Geophys.J.Int.,2000, 143 : 438-453

[10] Rong Y F,Jackson D D.Earthquake potential in and around China :estimated from past earthquakes.Geophys.Res.Lett.,2002, 29 (16) :10.1029P2002GL015297

文章导航

/