欢迎访问中国科学院大学学报,今天是
计算机科学

基于多模块贝叶斯网络的恐怖袭击威胁评估

  • 魏静 ,
  • 王菊韵 ,
  • 于华
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院大学工程管理与信息技术学院, 北京 100049;
    2. 中国传媒大学理学院, 北京 100024

收稿日期: 2014-03-31

  修回日期: 2014-05-07

  网络出版日期: 2015-03-15

基金资助

国家重点基础研究发展计划(2011CB706900)、国家自然科学基金(70971128)和北京市自然科学基金(9102022)资助

Terrorism threat assessment with multi-module Bayesian network

  • WEI Jing ,
  • WANG Juyun ,
  • YU Hua
Expand
  • 1. College of Engineering and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    2. College of Science, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, China

Received date: 2014-03-31

  Revised date: 2014-05-07

  Online published: 2015-03-15

摘要

通过考察恐怖袭击事件可能造成的后果, 针对恐怖袭击事件评估信息的多样性、不确定性及模糊性, 提出用贝叶斯网络方法对恐怖袭击威胁进行评估, 从而为反恐决策者提供决策支持, 以减少恐怖袭击所造成的影响.针对恐怖袭击事件的复杂性, 提出多模块贝叶斯网络的恐怖袭击威胁评估模型, 并对多模块贝叶斯网络的结构学习、参数学习和推理进行研究, 提出多模块贝叶斯网络的推理算法.最后, 给出恐怖袭击威胁度的计算方法, 并对多模块贝叶斯网络的威胁评估模型进行实例分析.实例表明, 基于多模块贝叶斯网络的恐怖袭击威胁评估模型, 能有效评估恐怖袭击事件的威胁程度.

本文引用格式

魏静 , 王菊韵 , 于华 . 基于多模块贝叶斯网络的恐怖袭击威胁评估[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2015 , 32(2) : 264 -272 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2015.02.017

Abstract

This study intends to provide decision support for counter-terrorism according to the threat of terrorist attacks. Because of the diversity, uncertainty, and ambiguity of assessment information about terrorist attacks, Bayesian network is proposed to assess threat from the consequence of attacks. This study presents a multi-module Bayesian network threat assessment model for the complexity of the terrorist attacks, and this model combines the qualitative and quantitative assessment. We study the multi-module Bayesian network structure learning, parameter learning, and inference. Finally we compute the terrorism threat degree and conduct instance analysis. Simulation results show that this model effectively assesses the real threat degree of terrorist attacks.

参考文献

[1] 李健和,王存奎,梅建明,等. 当代恐怖主义的特征与发展趋势[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报: 社会科学版, 2008(3):1-7.

[2] Geng R, Xu G. Application of AHP FSE method in the network course quality evaluation[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 15: 4 136-4 141.

[3] Li H, Chen Z, Chen S. The study of evaluation of the quality of the accounting information based on the fuzzy-AHP model[J]. Advances in Services Science and Services Information Technology (Set), 2014, 52: 185.

[4] Pradhan B. An assessment of the use of an advanced neural network model with five different training strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps[J]. Journal of Data Science, 2011, 9(1): 65-81.

[5] 沈阳武,彭晓涛,施通勤,等. 基于最优组合权重的电能质量灰色综合评价方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2012,36(10): 67-73.

[6] Baesens B, Verstraeten G, Van den Poel D, et al. Bayesian network classifiers for identifying the slope of the customer lifecycle of long-life customers[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 156(2): 508-523.

[7] Liu K F R, Lu C F, Chen C W, et al. Applying Bayesian belief networks to health risk assessment[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2012, 26(3): 451-465.

[8] Weber P, Medina-Oliva G, Simon C, et al. Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2012, 25(4): 671-682.

[9] Allanach J, Tu H, Singh S, et al. Detecting, tracking, and counteracting terrorist networks via hidden Markov models [C]//Aerospace Conference, 2004, Proceedings, IEEE. IEEE, 2004: 5.

[10] Singh S, Allanach J, Tu H, et al. Stochastic Modeling of a Terrorist Event via the ASAM system [C]//Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2004 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2004, 6: 5 673-5 678.

[11] Su X, Bai P, Du F, et al. Application of Bayesian networks in situation assessment [M]. Intelligent Computing and Information Science, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011: 643-648.

[12] Julia Flores M, Nicholson A E, Brunskill A, et al. Incorporating expert knowledge when learning Bayesian network structure: a medical case study[J]. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 2011, 53(3): 181-204.

[13] 叶跃祥,糜仲春,王宏宇,等. 基于贝叶斯网络的不确定环境下多属性决策方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2007(4):107-113.

[14] Laskey K B, Mahoney S M, Wright E. Hypothesis management in situation-specific network construction [C]//Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, 2001: 301-309.

[15] Mahoney S M, Laskey K B. Constructing situation specific belief networks [C]//Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, 1998: 370-378.

[16] Elzinga P, Poelmans J, Viaene S, et al. Terrorist threat assessment with formal concept analysis [C]//Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI), 2010 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2010: 77-82.

[17] Cooper G F, Herskovits E. A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data[J]. Machine Learning, 1992, 9(4): 309-347.

[18] Bouckaert R R. Optimizing causal orderings for generating DAGs from data [C]//Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, 1992: 9-16.

[19] 王双成. 贝叶斯网络学习、推理与应用[M].上海:立信会计出版社,2010.

[20] 赵晓风. 恐怖主义活动的社会心理危害及对策探讨[J]. 理论导刊,2009 (11):48-50.

[21] Pearl J. Fusin, propagation, and structuring in belief networks[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1986, 29: 241-288.

[22] de Campos C P, Cozman F G. Complexity of inferences in polytree-shaped semi-qualitative probabilistic networks [C]//AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2013: 217-223.

[23] Lauritzen S L, Spiegelhalter D J. Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems[J]. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 1988, 50(2):157-224.

[24] 鞠彦兵,王爱华. 基于贝叶斯网络的突发事件影响度研究[J]. 自然灾害学报,2011,20(5):40-46.

文章导航

/