收稿日期: 2014-06-04
修回日期: 2014-10-23
网络出版日期: 2015-05-15
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(41101460)、河南省教育厅人文社科研究项目(2015-ZD-038)、河南省教育厅科学技术重点研究项目(14A630002)和河南理工大学博士基金(SKB-2014-4)资助
Dynamic assessment of environmental risk for Yangtze River basin using objective weighting method
Received date: 2014-06-04
Revised date: 2014-10-23
Online published: 2015-05-15
为评估长江流域各省域单元环境风险状况,构建以风险源危险性、受体敏感性和恢复力3类指标组成的环境风险综合评价指标体系.引入"纵横向-拉开档次"法和"时序加权平均算子"法等客观赋权法,对流域各省级单元2000—2011年的环境风险进行动态综合评价.结果如下:时间上,2000—2011年长江流域环境风险呈先期有所下降,而后不断升高的特点;空间上,上海、江苏、河南为高风险区,安徽、湖南、湖北和浙江为较高风险区,四川、广西、重庆、云南等西部省份属中风险区,西藏和青海为低风险区.通过对流域各省级行政区环境风险时空动态综合评价和聚类分析,为流域的环境风险管理提供理论依据.
杨小林 , 李义玲 . 基于客观赋权法的长江流域环境风险时空动态综合评价[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2015 , 32(3) : 349 -355 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2015.03.009
An assessment index system is built and it is composed of the hazards of risk source and the sensitivity and resiliency of risk receptors. The dynamic assessment of environmental risk in the Yangtze River basin from 2000 to 2011 was evaluated by using the "vertical-and-horizontal scatter degree" method and the "time ordered weighted averaging operator" method. The results are given in the following. 1)Temporally, the environmental risk of the study area decreased slightly in the initial stage of the study period, followed by an obvious increase consequently. 2)Spatially, great variations in risk value indicate that the Yangtze River basin can be divided into the high, relatively high, medium, and low risk regions with assistance of cluster analysis. The high risk zone includes Shanghai, Jiangsu, and Henan; the relatively high risk zone includes Anhui, Hunan, Hubei, and Zhejiang; the provinces in the central area of the Yangtze River basin, such as Sichuan, Guangxi, Chongqing, Yunnan, and so on, are in the medium risk zone; and the Tibet and Qinghai occupy the low risk zone. The temporal and spatial patterns of environmental risk for the Yangtze River basin provides important scientific basis for the environmental risk management.
[1] 谢元博,李巍,郝芳华.基于区域环境风险评价的产业布局规划优化研究[J].中国环境科学,2013,33(3):560-568.
[2] 卢静,孙宁,夏建新,等.中国环境风险现状和发展趋势分析[J].环境科学与管理,2012,37(1):10-16.
[3] 陈郁,杨凤林,宋国宝,等.化工企业突发大气环境风险评价标准的探讨[J].环境科学学报,2012,32(9):2 310-2 318.
[4] 邢辉,周尊山,吕安勤,等.基于模糊综合评判方法的沉船风险预警[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(4):115-120.
[5] 巩杰,赵彩霞,王合领,等.基于地质灾害的陇南山区生态风险评价:以陇南市武都区为例[J].山地学报,2012,30(5):570-577.
[6] 曾小红,毕海普,司鹄.化工园区泄漏事故安全风险评估模式研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(2):165-170.
[7] Xu L Y, Liu G Y. The study of a method of regional environmental risk assessment [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90:3 290-3 296.
[8] 曲常胜,毕军,黄蕾,等.我国区域环境风险动态综合评价研究[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2010,46(3):477-482.
[9] 董军,国方媛.多层次系统的动态评价研究[J].运筹与管理,2011,20(5):176-184.
[10] 王银彩,马智利.长江流域各地区环境保护水平分析[J].云南地理环境研究,2006,18(1):87-92.
[11] 高丽娜,张仁健,韩志伟,等.2011年冬季长江三角洲气态污染物的模拟分析[J].中国科学院大学学报,2014,31(3):380-388.
[12] 张蕾,陈雯,陈晓,等.长江三角洲地区环境污染与经济增长的脱钩时空分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(3):275-279.
[13] 郭亚军,潘建民,曹仲秋.由时序立体数据表支持的动态综合评价方法[J].东北大学学报:自然科学版,2001,22(4):464-467.
[14] 郭亚军, 姚远, 易平涛. 一种动态综合评价方法及应用 [J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2007, 10:154-158.
[15] Yager R R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making [J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man,and Cybernetics, 1988, 18(1): 183-190.
[16] 曾维华, 宋永会, 姚新, 等. 多尺度突发环境污染事故风险区划 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社,2013.
[17] 孙晓蓉,邵超峰.基于DPSIR模型的天津滨海新区环境风险变化趋势分析[J].环境科学研究,2010,23(1):68-73.
[18] 朱华桂.论风险社会中的社区抗逆力问题[J].南京大学学报:哲学·人文科学·社会科学,2012,5:47-53.
[19] 李博,韩增林,孙才志,等.环渤海地区人海资源环境系统脆弱性的时空分析[J].资源科学,2012,34(11):2 214-2 221.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
