收稿日期: 2014-10-13
修回日期: 2015-04-03
网络出版日期: 2015-09-15
基金资助
中国科学院、国家外国专家局创新团队国际合作伙伴计划(KZZD-EW-TZ-19) 资助
Estimation of slip distribution for the Mw7.8 Kunlunshan earthquake by coseismic displacements
Received date: 2014-10-13
Revised date: 2015-04-03
Online published: 2015-09-15
2001年MW7.8昆仑山口西地震形成约400 km的地震破裂带,主震断层为一长度350 km、呈东西走向且近直立的走滑断层.主震断层附近的同震滑动位错为研究断层内部的力学性质及几何形态提供了重要参考.本文根据Freund的III-型位错模型,以实地测量和卫星测量的地表错动数据为约束条件,求取沿主震断层走向断层内部各点的滑动位移分布以及破裂面沿断层深度方向的扩展宽度.计算结果表明:III-型位错模拟结果所得断层面滑动位移分布特征和由有限断层模型体波反演得到的结果有较高的吻合程度,且在深度方向上呈现强烈的不均匀性.由III-型位错模型给出的断层内部的破裂宽度小于20 km,其平均值为8.4 km.进一步的对比分析表明:地表同震位移量的大小同断层的破裂宽度在尺度上存在明确的比例关系,沿断层走滑方向各点的滑动位移随深度的变化特征具有自相似性的分形特征.结合III-型位错模拟和体波反演结果,基于Andrews方法计算断层面上静态应力变化的分布,其分布特征同样具有很高的吻合度.
米琦 , 李彦恒 , 申文豪 , 史保平 . 由Mw7.8昆仑山地震地表位错推断滑动位移[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2015 , 32(5) : 652 -660 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2015.05.011
The Mw7.8 Kunlunshan earthquake of November 14,2001, which ruptured over a total distance of about 400 km, was characterized by a 350-km-long main fault with an east-ward-propagating pulse of left-lateral slip. The field observations of coseismic displacement along the main fault provide us a good opportunity to study the earthquake source mechanism and fault geometry inside the earth. In this paper, based on Freund's III-dislocation model and constrained by two groups of surface rupture data from field investigation and geodetic measurement, we invert the slip distribution, the variation of static stress drop on the fault surface, and the fault width extending at depth along the fault strike-slip direction. The pattern of slip distribution on the fault surface deduced from the III-dislocation model is very similar to the result of the finite-fault solution based on the teleseismic body-wave inversion, showing that both slip distributions appear intensively heterogeneous in the special domain. The fault rupture width is much less than 20 km. These results also imply that the coseismic displacement along the fault strike direction on the earth surface is proportional to the fault width. In addition we also calculate the static stress change on the fault based on the III-dislocation model and slip distribution by teleseismic inversion. The analytical and numerical results show that they have high-level consistency.
[1] Xu X, Chen W, Ma W, et al. Surface rupture of the Kunlunshan earthquake (Ms 8.1), northern Tibetan plateau, China [J]. Seismology Research Letter, 2002, 73:884-892.
[2] P J, Schwartz D P, Dawson T E, et al. Surface rupture of the 2002 Denali Fault, Alaska, earthquake and comparison with other strike-slip ruptures[J]. Earthquake Spectral, 2004, 20: 565-578.
[3] Ozaxar A A, Beck S L. The 2002 Denali fault and 2001 Kunlun fault earthquakes: complex rupture processes of two large strike-slip events[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2004, 94:S278-S292.
[4] Antolik M, Abercrombie R E, Ekstrom E. The 14 November 2001 Kokoxili (Kunlunshan), Tibet, earthquake: rupture transfer through a large extensional step-over[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2004,94: 1173-1194.
[5] Xu L S, Chen Y T. Temporal and spatial rupture process of the great Kunlun Mountain Pass earthquake of Nov.14, 2001, from GDSN long period waveform data [J]. Science in China, 2004,34 (3):256-264.
[6] 周仕勇,许忠淮,陈晓非.伽师强震群震源特征及震源机制力学成因分析[J].地球物理学报, 2001, 44(5):654-662.
[7] Scholz C. The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting[M]. New York: Cambridge U Press, 1990.
[8] Kanamori H, Anderson D L. Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1975, 65:1073-1095.
[9] Scholz C. Scaling laws for large earthquakes: consequences for physical models[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1982, 72:1-14.
[10] Romanowicz B. Strike-slip earthquakes on quasi-vertical transcurrent faults: inferences for general scaling relations[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 1992, 19:481-484.
[11] Bodin P, Brune J N. On the scaling of slip with rupture length for shallow strike-slip earthquakes: quasi-static models and dynamic rupture propagation[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1996, 86:1292-1299.
[12] Shaw B E, Scholz C H. Slip-length scaling in large earthquakes: observations and theory and implications for earthquake physics[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2001, 28:2991-2994.
[13] Zeng L Z, Heaton T, Christopher D. The effect of slip variability on earthquake slip-length scaling[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2005, 162(3): 841-849.
[14] King C P G, Wensnosky S G. Scaling of fault parameters for continental strike-slip earthquakes[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2007, 97:1833-1840.
[15] Barnett D M, Freund L B. An estimate of strike-slip fault friction stress and fault depth from surface displacement data[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1975, 65:1259-1266.
[16] 陈杰,陈宇坤,丁国瑜,等.2001年昆仑山口西8.1级地震地表破裂带[J].第四纪研究,2003, 23(6):629-639.
[17] Klinger Y, Xu X W, Tapponnier P, et al. High-resolution satellite imagery mapping of the surface rupture and slip distribution of the Ms7.8, 14 Novermber 2001 Kokoxili Earthquake, Kunlun Fault, Northern Tibet, China[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2005, 95(5):1970.
[18] Hirth J P, Lothe J. Theory of dislocations[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill,1968.
[19] Weertman J. Relationship between displacements on a free surface and the stress on a fault[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1965, 55: 945-953.
[20] Das S. The need to study speed[J]. Science, 2007, 317(17): 905.
[21] Cotton F, Archuleta R, Causse M. What is sigma of the stress drop?[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 2013,84(1):42-48.
[22] Toda S, Stein R S, Beroza G C, et al. Aftershocks halted by static stress shadows[J]. Nature, 2012,5:410-413.
[23] Andrew D J. A stochastic fault model: 1. Static case[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1980, 85:3867-3877.
[24] Paul S. Earthquake and volcano deformation[M]. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford. 2010.
[25] Okada Y. Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1992,82:1018-1040.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
