欢迎访问中国科学院大学学报,今天是
中国工程热物理学会2014年多相流年会专栏

喉嘴距对喷射器性能影响的实验研究

  • 陈伟雄 ,
  • 陈会强 ,
  • 石朝胤 ,
  • 王迎春 ,
  • 种道彤 ,
  • 严俊杰
展开
  • 西安交通大学动力工程多相流国家重点实验室, 西安 710049

收稿日期: 2015-03-13

  修回日期: 2015-07-07

  网络出版日期: 2016-03-15

基金资助

中国博士后科学基金(2014M552441)、国家自然科学基金(51125027) 和陕西省科技统筹创新工程计划 (2013KTCG01-06)资助

Experimental investigation of influences of primary nozzle exit position on ejector performance

  • CHEN Weixiong ,
  • CHEN Huiqiang ,
  • SHI Chaoyin ,
  • WANG Yingchun ,
  • CHONG Daotong ,
  • YAN Junjie
Expand
  • State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China

Received date: 2015-03-13

  Revised date: 2015-07-07

  Online published: 2016-03-15

摘要

喉嘴距是影响喷射器性能的重要结构参数,研究其对喷射器性能的影响对提升喷射器性能有重要意义.本文对喷射器性能进行实验研究,获得不同喉嘴距和运行工况参数下,喷射器性能的变化规律.研究发现:在本实验范围内,喉嘴距对喷射器的临界背压值影响较小,对喷射器引射比影响较大,引射比随喉嘴距的增大先增大后减小.喷射器单相运行时和两相运行时均存在一个最优喉嘴距,最优喉嘴距随低压流体含液量的增大而增大.当喷射器单相运行时,最优喉嘴距为2.8 mm,当低压流体含水量达到0.07 kg/min时,最优喉嘴距为3.6 mm.

本文引用格式

陈伟雄 , 陈会强 , 石朝胤 , 王迎春 , 种道彤 , 严俊杰 . 喉嘴距对喷射器性能影响的实验研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2016 , 33(2) : 253 -257 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2016.02.017

Abstract

The primary nozzle exit position (NXP) is one of the important geometrical factors affecting the ejector performance. In the present study, the ejector performance was investigated experimentally for getting the changing rules of the ejector performance with different NXPs and working conditions. The results show that the NXP has little influence on the critical pressure, but has obvious influence on entrainment ratio. The entrainment ratio first increases and then decreases with NXP. Both the two-phase and single-phase ejectors have their respective optimum NXPs. The optimum NXP increases with the water mass flowrate of the low-pressure fluent. The optimum NXP is 2.8 mm in single-phase operation while it becomes 3.6 mm when the water mass flowrate of the low-pressure fluent is 0.07 kg/min.

参考文献

[1] Sun D W, Eames I W. Recent developments in the design theories and applications of ejectors:a review[J]. J Inst Energy, 1995, 68(475):65-79.
[2] Chunnanond K, Aphornratana S. Ejectors: applications in refrigeration technology[J]. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 2004, 8(2):129-155.
[3] Keenan J, Neumann E. A simple air ejector[J]. J Appld Mech, 1942, 9(2):A75-A81.
[4] Keenan J H, Neumann E P, Lustwerk F. An investigation of ejector design by analysis and experiment[J]. J Appl Mech-Trans ASME, 1950, 17(3):299-309.
[5] Huang M C, Chen S L. An experimental investigation of ejector performance characteristics in a jet refrigeration system[J]. J Chin Inst Chem Eng, 1996, 27(2):91-100.
[6] Aphornratana S, Eames I W. A small capacity steam-ejector refrigerator: experimental investigation of a system using ejector with movable primary nozzle[J]. Int J Refrig-Rev Int Froid, 1997, 20(5):352-358.
[7] Zhu Y H, Cai W J, Wen C Y, et al. Numerical investigation of geometry parameters for design of high performance ejectors[J]. Appl Therm Eng, 2009, 29(5/6):898-905.
[8] Chen W X, Chong D T, Yan J J, et al. The numerical analysis of the effect of geometrical factors on natural gas ejector performance[J]. Appl Therm Eng, 2013, 59(1/2):21-29.
[9] 杨燕勤, 安志强, 经树栋. 喉嘴距、面积比和引射压力对喷射器性能影响的研究[J]. 化工装备技术, 2006, 27(1):68-72.
[10] 龙新平, 程茜, 韩宁,等. 射流泵最佳喉嘴距的数值模拟[J]. 核动力工程, 2008, 29(1):35-38.
[11] 王秀会, 赵军友, 左鹏,等. 喉嘴距对喷射引流器性能影响试验研究[J]. 石油矿场机械, 2014, (10):35-38.

文章导航

/