收稿日期: 2015-10-26
修回日期: 2016-03-04
网络出版日期: 2016-07-15
基金资助
中国科学院重点部署项目(KZZD-EW-10-04-2)、中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所135重点项目(NIGLAS2012135006)和国家自然科学基金重点项目(41130750)资助
Calculation and validation of industrial pollution discharge coefficients in Chun'an county
Received date: 2015-10-26
Revised date: 2016-03-04
Online published: 2016-07-15
根据2007年第1次全国污染源普查结果,利用淳安县205家企业的产值、废水排放、化学需氧量(chemical oxygen demand,COD)和氨氮排放量(NH3-N),核算不同行业万元产值排污系数;并采用33家重点企业2012年的排污数据进行验证。结果表明,在33类细分行业中,豆制品制造业万元产值废水(257.090 8 t)、COD(473.548 4 kg)和NH3-N (6.1719 kg)排放均最大;棉、化纤纺织加工业万元产值废水(0.000 6 t)、COD(0.003 2 kg) 和NH3-N(0.000 0 kg)排放均最低。丝绢纺织及精加工、碳酸饮料制造和食用植物油加工业的万元产值NH3-N排放量也为0.000 0 kg。排污系数验证显示,啤酒制造、果菜汁及果菜汁饮料制造和豆制品制造业的万元产值排污系数误差较大,预测值均高于实测值;其他行业万元产值排污系数误差较小,多为预测值略低于实测值。
张姗姗 , 张落成 , 杨永可 , 李恒鹏 , 吴志旭 . 淳安县工业源排污系数核算与检验[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2016 , 33(4) : 489 -496 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2016.04.009
Based on the output values and pollution discharge data (wastewater, chemical oxygen demand,and NH3-N) of 205 enterprises in Chun'an county in China obtained from the first national pollution source census of 2007, the discharge coefficients of pollutant over products of 10 000 yuan for different industrial categories in Chun'an county were calculated.Moreover, output values and pollution discharge data of 33 enterprises in 2012 were used to validate calculation results.The results showed that the soy products manufacturing was the highest pollution discharge industry and the draining wastewater, COD,and NH3-N were up to 257.090 8 t, 473.548 4 kg, and 6.171 9 kg,respectively, whereas the discharge coefficients were the lowest for the cotton and chemical fiber textile industry (0.000 6 t, 0.003 2 kg, and 0.000 0 kg, respectively).Additionally, the discharge coefficient of NH3-N over products of 10 000 yuan was 0.000 0 kg for the silk spinning and finishing, carbonated beverage manufacturing,and edible vegetable oil processing.Validation results showed that the prediction errors in the discharge coefficients were marked in beer manufacturing, fruit juice beverage manufacturing,and soy products manufacturing, and the predicted values were larger than the measured values.However, the predicted values well matched the measured values in the other industries, and the predicted values were all slightly smaller than the measured values.
[1] 段宁, 郭庭政, 孙启宏,等.国内外产排污系数开发现状及其启示 [J].环境科学研究, 2009,22(5) :622-626.
[2] 谢红彬, 陈雯.太湖流域制造业结构变化对水环境演变的影响分析:以苏锡常地区为例 [J].湖泊科学, 2002,14(1):53-59.
[3] 中国环境科学研究院.第一次全国污染源普查工业污染源产排污系数核算项目技术报告 .北京, 2008.
[4] 蔡佑振.第一次全国污染源普查的一些思考 [J].环境科学导刊, 2009,28(3):98-101.
[5] 曹群, 郭正, 潘琼,等.工业源产排污系数在污染源普查中的应用分析 [J].环境与可持续发展, 2009(2):14-15.
[6] 金瑜.浅谈工业源产排污系数的应用[J].污染防治技术, 2009,22(5):88-90.
[7] 董广霞, 周冏, 王军霞,等.工业污染源核算方法探讨[J].环境保护, 2013(12):57-59.
[8] 杨龙元, 范成新, 张路.太湖典型地区工矿企业废水中主要污染物排放特征研究:以江苏溧阳市为例 [J].湖泊科学, 2003,15(2):139-146.
[9] 韩晓霞, 朱广伟, 吴志旭,等.新安江水库(千岛湖)水质时空变化特征及保护策略 [J].湖泊科学, 2013,25(6):836-845.
[10] 余员龙, 任丽萍, 刘其根,等.2007—2008年千岛湖营养盐时空分布及其影响因素 [J].湖泊科学, 2010,22(5):684-692.
[11] 韩伟明, 胡水景, 金卫,等.千岛湖水环境质量调查与保护对策研究 [J].环境科学研究, 1997,10(06):23-29.
[12] 吕唤春.千岛湖流域农业非点源污染及其生态郊应的研究 .杭州:浙江大学, 2002.
[13] 张红举, 彭树恒, 周娅,等.千岛湖现状污染负荷分析与限制排污总量研究[J].水资源保护, 2014(4):53-56, 96.
[14] 程曦.湖泊水质与经济发展关系研究:来自中国48个典型湖泊横截面数据的证据 [J].党政干部学刊, 2012(9):46-55.
[15] 严力蛟, 俞新华, 方志发.影响千岛湖水质的主要环境问题与富营养化防治对策 [J].当代生态农业, 2001(Z2):94-96.
[16] 淳安县统计局.淳安统计年鉴2007[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2008.
[17] 淳安县统计局.淳安统计年鉴2012[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2013.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |