欢迎访问中国科学院大学学报,今天是
地球科学

西南印度洋洋中脊(SWIR)热液A区的超慢速区岩浆活动的热模拟

  • 卞龙 ,
  • 张健 ,
  • 阮爱国
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院计算地球动力学重点实验室, 北京 100049;
    2. 中国科学院大学地球科学学院, 北京 100049;
    3. 国家海洋局第二海洋研究所, 杭州 310012;
    4. 国家海洋局海底科学重点实验室, 杭州 310012

收稿日期: 2016-03-10

  网络出版日期: 2016-11-15

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(41574074,41430319,41174085)、中国科学院战略先导项目(XDA1103010102)和中国科学院创新团队项目(KZZD-EW-TZ-19)资助

Numerical thermal modeling of the magmatism at ultraslow spreading zone of hydrothermal area A of Southwest Indian Ridge (SWIR)

  • BIAN Long ,
  • ZHANG Jian ,
  • RUAN Aiguo
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Computational Geodynamics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    2. College of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. Second Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou 310012, China;
    4. Key Laboratory of Submarine Geosciences, State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou 310012, China

Received date: 2016-03-10

  Online published: 2016-11-15

摘要

中国大洋环球21航次第6航段在西南印度洋洋中脊(SWIR)热液A区获取了OBS地震数据,发现了位于该区第27洋脊段的低速区.基于该低速区地震P波速度模型,用有限单元法开展热模拟计算,研究低速区可能存在的岩浆活动及其热效应.结果表明:1)现今海底热液活动特点支持岩浆房存在底部供热热源的情况.热点供热使岩浆在沿断裂移动过程中产生热异常,形成新的岩浆房,为现今热液活动提供热源.2)随温度变化的热导率对模拟计算结果影响较大.通过反演拟合热导率模型系数,并利用实验室统计结果校正热导率模型,计算出研究区莫霍面温度约为910℃,热点热流约为190 mW·m-2.

本文引用格式

卞龙 , 张健 , 阮爱国 . 西南印度洋洋中脊(SWIR)热液A区的超慢速区岩浆活动的热模拟[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2016 , 33(6) : 792 -801 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2016.06.011

Abstract

The Chinese DY115-21 cruse acquired valuable OBS seismic data at hydrothermal area A of SWIR and discovered a low-velocity zone which located on the 27th segment of SWIR. Based on velocity section of P wave, we use the finite element method to model the heating process, aiming to discover the possible magmatism and heat effect of the low-velocity zone. The results are given as follows. 1) The current seafloor hydrothermal activity indicates the existence of bottom heating power in the magma chamber. Hotspot causes thermal abnormality in the process of magma moving along the fracture and creates a new magma chamber to provide heat resource for current hydrothermal activities. 2)Temperature-dependent thermal conductivity greatly influenced the results of the thermal modeling. The modeling results show that the moho temperature of the research area is about 910℃ and the heat flux at the hotspot is about 190 mW·m-2.

参考文献

[1] Bach W, Banerjee N R, Dick H J B, et al. Discovery of ancient and active hydrothermal deposits along the ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge 10°~16°E[J]. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 2002, 3(7):1-44.
[2] Meyzen C M, Toplis M J, Humler E. A discontinuity in mantle composition beneath the Southwest Indian Ridge[J]. Nature, 2003, 421:731-733.
[3] Dick H J B, Lin J, Schouten H. An ultraslow-spreading class of ocean ridge[J]. Nature, 2003, 426(27):405-412.
[4] 陶春辉, 李怀明, 杨耀民, 等. 我国在南大西洋中脊发现两个热液活动区[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2011, 41(7):887-889.
[5] 陶春辉, 李怀明, 黄威, 等. 西南印度洋脊49°39'E热液区硫化物烟囱体的矿物学和地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 科学通报, 2011, 56(28):2413-2423.
[6] Zhao M H, Qiu X L, Li J B, et al. Three-dimensional seismic structure of the Dragon Flag oceanic core complex at the ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge (49°39'E)[J]. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 2013, 14:4544-4563.
[7] 阮爱国, 李家彪, 陈永顺, 等. 国产I-4C型OBS在西南印度洋中脊的试验[J]. 地球物理学报, 2010, 53(4):1015-1018.
[8] 牛雄伟, 阮爱国, 李家彪, 等. 洋中脊构造及地震调查现状[J]. 华南地震, 2009, 29(4):72-84.
[9] 牛雄伟. 西南印度洋中脊广角地震层析成像. 杭州:浙江大学, 2014.
[10] Niu X, Ruan A, Li J. Along-axis variation in crustal thickness at the ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge (50°E) from a wide-angle seismic experiment[J]. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 2015, 16:468-485.
[11] Sauter D, Carton H, Mendel V, et al. Ridge segmentation and the magnetic structure of the Southwest Indian Ridge (at 50°30'E, 55°30'E and 66°20'E) Implications for magmatic processes at ultraslow-spreading centers[J]. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 2004, 5(5):doi:10.1029/2003GC000581.
[12] Buck W R, Lavier L L, Poliakov A N B. Modes of faulting at mid-ocean ridges[J]. Nature, 2005, 434:719-723.
[13] 黄少鹏, 汪集旸. 中国大陆地区大地热流与Pn波速度的变化[J].地震学报, 1992, 14(1):42-50.
[14] 张健, 石耀霖. 沉积盆地岩浆侵入的热模拟[J]. 地球物理学进展, 1997, 12(3):55-64.
[15] 石耀霖, 王其允. 圣安德烈斯断层门多西诺三联点迁移的构造热效应[J]. 地球物理学报, 1997, 40(2):231-238.
[16] 孟林, 张健. 南海西南海盆残余洋脊岩浆活动机制的热模拟研究[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2014, 44(2):239-249.
[17] 曹红, 曹志敏. 西南印度洋中脊热液活动[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2011, 31(1):67-76.
[18] Patriat P, Segoufin J. Reconstruction of the central Indian Ocean[J]. Tectonophysics, 1998, 155:211-234.
[19] 张涛, Lin J, 高金耀. 西南印度洋中脊热液区的岩浆活动与构造特征[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2013, 43(11):1834-1846.
[20] 张涛, 高金耀. 西南印度洋中脊超慢速扩展的构造和岩浆活动特征[J]. 海洋科学进展, 2011, 29(3):314-322.
[21] 张涛, 林间, 高金耀. 90Ma以来热点与西南印度洋中脊的交互作用:海台与板内海山形成[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2011, 41(6):760-772.
[22] Cannat M, Sauter D, Escartin J, et al. A-volcanic seafloor generation at a melt-poor ultraslow-spreading ridge:Southwest Indian Ridge 61°~67°E[J]. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 2005, 7:09159.
[23] 赵明辉, 丘学林, 李家彪, 等. 慢速、超慢速扩张洋中脊三维地震结构研究进展与展望[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2010, 29(6):1-7.
[24] Li J B, Jian H C, Chen Y S, et al. Seismic observation of an extremely magmatic accretion at the ultraslow spreading southwest Indian Ridge[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 43:2656-2663.
[25] Gemmer L, Nielsen S B, Huuse M, et al. Post-mid-Cretaceous eastern North Sea evolution inferred from 3D thermo-mechanical modelling[J]. Tectonophysics, 2002, 350(4):315-342.
[26] 张健, 宋海斌, 李家彪. 南海西南海盆构造演化的热模拟研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2005, 48(6):1357-1365.
[27] 张健, 李家彪. 南海西南海盆壳幔结构重力反演与热模拟分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2011, 54(12):3026-3037.
[28] He L J. Numerical modeling of convective erosion and peridotite-melt interaction in big mantle wedge:Implications for the destruction of the North China Craton[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth, 2014, 119(4):3662-3677.
[29] 孙天亮. 不同凝固潜热处理方法对计算铸坯温度场影响的评估[J]. 冶金自动化, 2004, 28(z1):79-82.
[30] Toulowkian Y S, Judd W R, Roy R F. Physical properties of rocks and minerals[M]. New York:Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1981:528-575.
[31] 吴时国, 张健. 海底构造与地球物理学[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2014:306-317.
[32] Zoth G, Haenel R. Thermal conductivity of terrestrial heat-Flow density Determination[M]. Massachusetts:Kluwer Acad, 1988:449-453.
[33] Sass J, Lachenbruch A H, Moses T. Heat flow from a scientific research well at Cajon Pass, California[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth (1978-2012), 1992, 97(B4):5017-5030.
[34] Seipold U. Temperature dependence of thermal transport properties of crystalline rocks:a general law[J]. Tectonophysics, 1998, 291(1):161-171.
[35] Vosteen H-D, Schellschmidt R. Influence of temperature on thermal conductivity, thermal capacity and thermal diffusivity for different types of rock[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2003, 28(9):499-509.

文章导航

/