欢迎访问中国科学院大学学报,今天是
研究论文

空气质量响应曲面模型在杭州市的应用

  • 戴志翔 ,
  • 胡诗玮 ,
  • 罗坤 ,
  • 高翔 ,
  • 樊建人 ,
  • 岑可法
展开
  • 浙江大学能源清洁利用国家重点实验室, 杭州 310027

收稿日期: 2016-04-21

  修回日期: 2016-07-03

  网络出版日期: 2017-03-15

基金资助

环保部公益项目(201409008-4)和浙江省社会发展重大专项(2014C03025)资助

Application of air quality response surface model (RSM) in Hangzhou

  • DAI Zhixiang ,
  • HU Shiwei ,
  • LUO Kun ,
  • GAO Xiang ,
  • FAN Jianren ,
  • CEN Kefa
Expand
  • State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

Received date: 2016-04-21

  Revised date: 2016-07-03

  Online published: 2017-03-15

摘要

基于CMAQ模拟结果,统计、归纳出各种污染物排放控制因子与污染物浓度之间的函数关系,建立空气质量响应曲面模型RSM,通过留一法交叉验证和外部验证对模型进行可靠性验证。使用RSM,研究不同污染物的PM2.5响应值,评估现有政策不变(Ⅰ)和政策收紧(Ⅱ)两种减排情景,发现NOX、SO2、NH3和VOC对PM2.5浓度体现明显的非线性响应特征,情景Ⅱ的减排效果明显好于情景Ⅰ,夏季的减排效果好于冬季。

本文引用格式

戴志翔 , 胡诗玮 , 罗坤 , 高翔 , 樊建人 , 岑可法 . 空气质量响应曲面模型在杭州市的应用[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2017 , 34(2) : 179 -185 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2017.02.009

Abstract

Based on the CMAQ simulation results, we summarize the function relationships between various pollutant emission control factors and the concentrations of pollutants to establish air quality response surface model (RSM). The cross validation and external validation are used to evaluate the model reliability. In the study of the PM2.5 response of different pollutants and the future emission control scenarios (Ⅰ and Ⅱ) in Hangzhou, we find that NOX, SO2, NH3, and VOC have obvious nonlinear response characteristics to PM2.5 emissions and that the effect of scenario Ⅱ is stronger than that of scenario Ⅰ and the effect in summer is stronger than in winter.

参考文献

[1] Sheehan P, Cheng E, English A, et al. China's response to the air pollution shock[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4(5):306-309.
[2] Chen R, Zhao Z, Kan H. Heavy smog and hospital visits in Beijing, China[J]. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2013, 188(9):1170-1171.
[3] Pope Ⅲ C A, Burnett R T, Thun M J, et al. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution[J]. Jama, 2002, 287(9):1132-1141.
[4] Byun D, Schere K L. Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 community multiscale air quality (CMAQ) modeling system[J]. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2006, 59(2):51-77.
[5] Wang L T, Wei Z, Yang J, et al. The 2013 severe haze over southern Hebei, China:model evaluation, source apportionment, and policy implications[J]. Atmos Chem Phys, 2014, 14(6):3151-3173.
[6] Zhang Y, Liu X H, Olsen K M, et al. Responses of future air quality to emission controls over North Carolina. Part Ⅱ:Analyses of future-year predictions and their policy implications[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2010, 44(23):2767-2779.
[7] Khayet M, Seman M N A, Hilal N. Response surface modeling and optimization of composite nanofiltration modified membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 349(1):113-122.
[8] 严茹莎, 李莉, 安静宇, 等. 夏季长三角地区臭氧非线性响应曲面模型的建立及应用[J]. 环境科学学报, 2016, 36(4):1383-1392.
[9] 劳苑雯,朱云,Jang C,等. 基于响应面模型的区域大气污染控制辅助决策工具研发[J]. 环境科学学报,2012,32(8):1913-1922.
[10] Ba? D, Boyac? i H. Modeling and optimization I:Usability of response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2007, 78(3):836-845.
[11] Hanna S R, Chang J C, Fernau M E. Monte Carlo estimates of uncertainties in predictions by a photochemical grid model (UAM-IV) due to uncertainties in input variables[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1998, 32(21):3619-3628.
[12] Moore G E, Londergan R J. Sampled Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis for photochemical grid models[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2001, 35(28):4863-4876.
[13] 吴小芳. 基于区域多尺度空气质量模型对杭州市大气污染的模式研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2014.
[14] Iman R L. Latin hypercube sampling. Encyclopedia of quantitative risk analysis and assessment[M]. New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons, 2008:408-411.
[15] 邢佳. 大气污染排放与环境效应的非线性响应关系研究[D].北京:清华大学,2011.
[16] 魏巍. 中国人为源挥发性有机化合物的排放现状及未来趋势[D].北京:清华大学,2009.
文章导航

/