欢迎访问中国科学院大学学报,今天是
地球科学

马里亚纳海沟Challenger Deep的岩石圈流变结构与动力学分析

  • 高玲举 ,
  • 张健 ,
  • 吴时国
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院计算地球动力学重点实验室, 北京 100049;
    2. 中国科学院大学地球科学学院, 北京 100049;
    3. 中国科学院深海科学与工程研究所, 海南 三亚 572000

收稿日期: 2016-05-30

  修回日期: 2016-10-31

  网络出版日期: 2017-05-15

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(41574047,41430319,41174085,91228205)、中国科学院战略先导项目(XDA1103010102、XDB06030400)和中国科学院创新团队项目(KZZD-EW-TZ-19)资助

Analysis of lithospheric rheological structure and dynamics of the Challenger Deep in Mariana trench

  • GAO Lingju ,
  • ZHANG Jian ,
  • WU Shiguo
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Computational Geodynamics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    2. College of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sanya 572000, Hainan, China

Received date: 2016-05-30

  Revised date: 2016-10-31

  Online published: 2017-05-15

摘要

马里亚纳海沟是西太平洋板块边缘沟-弧-盆体系构造演化的关键地区,其南端的Challenger Deep不仅是地球表面最深点,也是马里亚纳海沟、马里亚纳岛弧、马里亚纳海槽、西马里亚纳洋脊和帕里西维拉海盆的构造汇聚点。开展岩石流变结构与动力学过程研究对于认识Challenger Deep的形成演化具有重要的科学意义。利用综合地球物理资料,通过对重、磁数据的计算分析,研究马里亚纳沟-弧-槽-盆系统的等效黏滞系数和岩石圈强度等流变学特征。利用地震资料,勾绘海沟之下贝尼奥夫带随深度变化的特征以及陡变形态。计算结果表明:对应马里亚纳海沟-岛弧-海槽系统,自由空气重力异常向东凸出,形成弧型异常区;区内异常表现为串珠状线性特征,异常值中间高,两侧低。不同深度岩石圈累积强度比值表明,海沟南北两侧地壳上硬下软,海沟中部地壳上软下硬。在给定应变速率条件下计算的等效黏滞系数东高西低,说明西侧构造体地壳比东侧构造体地壳更容易变形。Challenger Deep岩石圈强度较大,等效黏滞系数较高,具有上硬下软的流变学特征,为板块俯冲在该区的弯曲、撕裂与快速翻转提供了重要条件。地震与重力剖面分析表明,Challenger Deep处的岩石圈累积应力强度和有效粘滞系数条件,可以使马里亚纳海沟俯冲带在重力作用下弯曲、开裂,或部分向南翻转、变陡。

本文引用格式

高玲举 , 张健 , 吴时国 . 马里亚纳海沟Challenger Deep的岩石圈流变结构与动力学分析[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2017 , 34(3) : 380 -388 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2017.03.012

Abstract

Mariana trench is the key area of tectonic evolution in the western Pacific ocean plate edge trench-arc-basin system. The Challenger Deep in the southernmost Mariana trench is the deepest point on the Earth's surface, and the structural convergence point of Mariana trench, Mariana arc, Mariana trough, west Mariana ridge, and Parece Vela basin. It is important for understanding Challenger Deep formation evolution to study Challenger Deep lithospheric rheological structure and dynamics. In this work, based on the analysis of gravity and magnetic data, we obtained the rheological characteristics of the equivalent viscous coefficient and the lithosphere strength of the Mariana trench-arc-trough-basin system. We drew the characteristics changing with depth and the abrupt form of Wadati-Benioff zone under the trench through the calculation of the seismic data. The calculation results are showed as follows. 1) Corresponding to Mariana trench-arc-trough system, the free air gravity anomaly formed an eastward protruding arc anomaly zone, which showed beaded linear characteristics. The abnormal value was high in the middle and low at both sides. 2) The lithosphere integrated intensity ratios at different depths reflected that on the north and south sides of the trench the upper crust was hard and the lower was soft, and on the middle trench the upper crust was soft and the lower was hard. We calculated the equivalent viscosity coefficients using a given strain rate, and found that the value in the east was high and the value in the west was low, which illustrated that the deformation of the west side of the crust is more easily than that of the east side of the crust. With large lithosphere strength, high equivalent viscous coefficient, and hard upper crust and soft lower crust rheological characteristics, Challenger Deep provided important conditions for bending, tearing, and rapid reversal of the plate subduction area. The analysis of seismicity and gravity profile showed that the lithosphere cumulative stress intensity and effective viscosity coefficient at the Challenger Deep would make the Mariana trench subduction zone bending and cracking or partially turning toward the south and steeping under the action of gravity.

参考文献

[1] Taylor B. Rifting and the volcanic-tectonic evolution of the Izu-Bonin-Mariana arc[J]. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, 1992, 126: 627-651.
[2] Sherman H B, Taylor B, Christopher J M, et al. Early arc volcanism and the ophiolite problem: a perspective from drilling the western Pacific[J]. Geophysical Monograph Series in Active Margins and Marginal Basins of the Western Pacific, 1995, 88: 1-30.
[3] Cosca M A, Arculus R J, Pearce J A, et al. 40Ar/39Ar and K-Ar age constraints for the inception and early evolution of the Izu-Bonin-Mariana arc system[J]. The Island Arc, 1998, 7(3): 579-595.
[4] Fryer P, Becker N, Appelgate B, et al. Why is the Challenger Deep so deep?[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2003, 211(3): 259-269.
[5] 刘方兰, 曲佳. 马里亚纳海沟水深探测及"挑战者深渊"海底地形特征[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2003, 29(4): 7-11.
[6] Seno T, Stein S, Gripp A E. A model for the motion of the Philippine Sea Plate consistent with NUVEL-1 and geological data[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Part B: Solid Earth, 1993, 98(B10): 17 941-17 948.
[7] Stern R J, Fouch M J, Klemperer S. An overview of the Izu-Bonin-Mariana subduction factory[J]. Inside the Subduction Factory Geophysical Monograph Series, 2003, 138: 175-222.
[8] Oakley A J, Taylor B, Moore G F. Sedimentary, volcanic, and tectonic processes of the central Mariana Arc: Mariana Trough back-arc basin formation and the West Mariana Ridge[J]. G-Cubed: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 2009, 10(8): 1-29.
[9] 林长松, 王冠荣. 马里亚纳岛弧系的垂向旋转运动与海槽的形成[J]. 海洋学报, 1992, 14(5): 86-94.
[10] Karig D E. Structural history of the Mariana island arc system[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1971, 82(2): 323-344.
[11] Sinton J B, Hussong D M. Crustal structure of a short length transform fault in the central Mariana Trough[J]. Geophysical Monograph Series in the Tectonic and Geologic Evolution of the Southeast Asian Seas and Islands: Part 2, 1983, 27: 236-254.
[12] Stuben D, Neumann T, Taibi N E, et al. Segmentation of the southern Mariana back-arc spreading center[J]. The Island Arc, 1998, 7(3): 513-524.
[13] Kato T, Beavan J, Matsushima T, et al. Geodetic evidence of back-arc spreading in the Mariana Trough[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2003, 30(12): 1 625.
[14] Bibee L D, Shor G G, Lu R S. Inter-arc spreading in the Mariana Trough[J]. Marine Geology, 1980, 35(1-3): 183-197.
[15] Hussong D M, Uyeda S. Tectonic processes and the history of the Mariana Arc: a synthesis of the results of Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg-60[J]. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, 1982, 60(3): 909-929.
[16] Honsho C, Tamaki K, Fujimoto H. Bathymetric and geomagnetic survey of the Mariana Trough 16°N[J]. Jamstec Journal of Deep Sea Research, 1997, 13(2): 21-29.
[17] Karig D E, Anderson R N, Bibee L D. Characteristics of back arc spreading in the Mariana Trough[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Part B: Solid Earth, 1978, 83(B3): 1 213-1 226.
[18] Martinez F, Fryer P, Becker N. Geophysical characteristics of the Southern Mariana Trough, 11°50'N-13°40'N[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Part B: Solid Earth, 2000, 105(B7): 16 591-16 608.
[19] Fryer P, Sujimoto H, Sekine M, et al. Volcanoes of the southwestern extension of the active Mariana Island Arc: new swath-mapping and geochemical studies[J]. The Island Arc, 1998, 7(3): 596-607.
[20] Fryer P, Martinez F, Becker N, et al. A subduction factory laboratory: tectonics of the southern Mariana convergent margin[J]. EOS, 2001, 82: 1 187.
[21] 高玲举, 张健, 董淼,等. 川西高原重磁异常特征与构造背景分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2015, 58(8): 2 996-3 008.
[22] 孙玉军, 董树文, 范桃园,等. 中国大陆及邻区岩石圈三维流变结构[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(9): 2 936-2 946.
[23] 邢健. 重力2.5维多界面反演方法及其在俯冲带研究中的应用:以日本-IBM 俯冲带为例[D]. 北京: 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所, 2016.
[24] Gvirtzman Z, Stern R J. Bathymetry of Mariana trench-arc system and formation of the Challenger Deep as a consequence of weak plate coupling[J]. Tectonics, 2004, 23(2):1-15.
[25] Gudmundsson O, Sambridge M. A regionalized upper mantle (RUM) seismic model[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 1998, 103(B4): 7 121-7 136.
[26] Karig D E, Ranken B. Marine geology of the forearc region, southern Mariana Island arc[J]. Geophysical Monograph Series in the Tectonic and Geologic Evolution of Southeast Asian Seas and Islands: Part 2, 1983, 27: 266-280.
[27] Takahashi N, Kodaira S, Tatsumi Y, et al. Structure and growth of the Izu-Bonin-Mariana arc crust: 1. Seismic constraint on crust and mantle structure of the Mariana arc-back-arc system[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2008, 113(B1): B1104.
[28] Hilst R V D, Engdahl R, Spakman W, et al. Tomographic imaging of subducted lithosphere below northwest Pacific island arcs[J]. Nature, 1991, 353(6339): 37-43.
[29] Dvorkin J, Nur A, Mavko G, et al. Narrow subducting slabs and the origin of backarc basins[J]. Tectonophysics, 1993, 227(1-4): 63-79.
[30] Nur A, Dvorkin J, Mavko G, et al. Speculations on the origin and fate of backarc basins[J]. Annals of Geophysics, 1991, 36(2): 155-163.
[31] Gvirtzman Z, Nur A. Plate detachment, asthenosphere upwelling, and topography across subduction zones[J]. Geology, 1999, 27(6): 563-566.
文章导航

/