东北西部农牧交错带社会生态系统脆弱性

王林峰; 张平宇; 李鹤; 刘世薇

doi:10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2018.03.009

中国科学院大学学报 >

2018 , Vol. 35 >Issue 3: 345 - 352

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2018.03.009

环境科学与地理学

东北西部农牧交错带社会生态系统脆弱性

王林峰 ,
张平宇 ,
李鹤 ,
刘世薇

展开

1 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所, 长春 130102;
2 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期: 2017-08-31

修回日期: 2017-11-06

网络出版日期: 2018-05-15

基金资助

中国科学院重点部署项目（ZDBS-SSW-SQC）、中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院重大咨询项目（Y02015005）、国家自然科学基金青年基金（41601124）和中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所"一三五"规划与特色所服务项目（Y6H2091001，IGA-135-04）资助

收起

Vulnerability of social-ecosystem in agro-pastoral ecotone in western Northeast China

WANG Linfeng ,
ZHANG Pingyu ,
LI He ,
LIU Shiwei

Expand

1 Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China;
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2017-08-31

Revised date: 2017-11-06

Online published: 2018-05-15

Fold

摘要

脆弱性理论与方法已成为研究复杂社会生态系统可持续发展的有力工具。通过构建脆弱性评价指标体系，研究振兴东北战略实施以来东北西部农牧交错带社会生态系统脆弱性时空演变特征。结果如下。1）东北西部农牧交错带社会生态系统脆弱性总体呈下降趋势，平均脆弱性得分由2005年的1.343下降到2015年的1.197；适应能力的提高是地区脆弱性降低的主要原因。2）脆弱性水平呈"西南高、东北低"、"北部稳定、中南部下降"的时空分异特征。3）低应对能力是地区脆弱性的主要特征，而各脆弱类型呈差异化分布态势。在当前东北地区粮食结构调整背景下，针对不同地区的脆弱性特征，实施差异化的应对策略是保证地区可持续发展的有效途径。

关键词： 脆弱性; 社会生态系统; 农牧交错带; 时空演变; 东北西部

本文引用格式

王林峰 , 张平宇 , 李鹤 , 刘世薇 . 东北西部农牧交错带社会生态系统脆弱性[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2018 , 35(3) : 345 -352 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2018.03.009

Abstract

The vulnerability study has become a powerful tool for the comprehensive analysis of the social-ecosystem. This paper analyses the spatio-temporal characteristics of vulnerability of the social-ecosystem in the agro-pastoral ecotone in western Northeast China by constructing a vulnerability evaluation index system. The results are given as follows. 1) The vulnerability level in the agro-pastoral ecotone in western Northeast China totally demonstrated a downward trend from 2005 to 2015, and it evolved from 1.343 in 2005 to 1.197 in 2015. 2) The vulnerability in the southwest of the study area is at high level while in the northeast it is relatively low. Additionally, it stays stable in the north while declines in the south and in the central region. 3) The low response ability is the main characteristic in the agro-pastoral ecotone and the various vulnerable types demonstrate differential distributions. Under the background of the current grain structure adjustment in Northeast China, it is an effective way to ensure the sustainable development of the region to implement different strategies according to the different characteristics.

Key words： vulnerability; social-ecosystem; agro-pastoral ecotone; spatio-temporal characteristic; the western Northeast China

参考文献

[1] Giupponi C,Biscaro C. Vulnerabilities:bibliometric analysis and literature review of evolving concepts[J]. Environmental Research Letters,2015,10(12):1-12.
[2] Adger W N. Vulnerability[J]. Global Environmental Change,2006,16(3):268-281.
[3] Turner B L,Kasperson R E,Matson P A,et al. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2003,100(14):8074-8079.
[4] 李鹤,张平宇,程叶青. 脆弱性的概念及其评价方法[J]. 地理科学进展,2008,27(2):18-25.
[5] 刘爱华,谢正观,王家卓. GIS技术在山地城市生态敏感性分析中的应用[J]. 中国科学院研究生院学报,2012,29(4):455-460.
[6] Aleksandrova M,Lamers J P A,Martius C,et al. Rural vulnerability to environmental change in the irrigated lowlands of Central Asia and options for policy-makers:a review[J]. Environmental Science & Policy,2014,41:77-88.
[7] Dercon S,Krishnan P. Vulnerability,seasonality and poverty in Ethiopia[J]. Journal of Development Studies,2000,36(6):25-53.
[8] 李鹤,张平宇. 东北地区矿业城市经济系统脆弱性分析[J]. 煤炭学报,2008,33(1):116-120.
[9] Urruty N,Tailliez-Lefebvre D,Huyghe C. Stability,robustness,vulnerability and resilience of agricultural systems:a review[J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development,2016,36(1):1-15.
[10] Paschen J A,Beilin R. How a risk focus in emergency management can restrict community resilience:a case study from Victoria,Australia[J]. International Journal of Wildland Fire,2017,26(1):1-9.
[11] Gallopín G C. Linkages between vulnerability,resilience and adaptive capacity[J]. Global Environmental Change,2006,16(3):293-303.
[12] 何艳冰,黄晓军,翟令鑫,等. 西安快速城市化边缘区社会脆弱性评价与影响因素[J]. 地理学报,2016,71(8):1315-1328.
[13] Bennett N J,Blythe J,Tyler S,et al. Communities and change in the anthropocene:understanding social-ecological vulnerability and planning adaptations to multiple interacting exposures[J]. Regional Environmental Change,2016,16(4):907-926.
[14] O'Brien K,Leichenko R,Kelkar U,et al. Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors:climate change and globalization in India[J]. Global Environmental Change,2004,14(4):303-313.
[15] Belliveau S,Smit B,Bradshaw B. Multiple exposures and dynamic vulnerability:evidence from the grape industry in the Okanagan Valley,Canada[J].Global Environmental Change,2006,16(4):364-378.
[16] Nazari S,Rad G P,Sedighi H,et al. Vulnerability of wheat farmers:toward a conceptual framework[J]. Ecological Indicators,2015,52:517-532.
[17] 杨新军,张慧,王子侨. 基于情景分析的西北农村社会-生态系统脆弱性研究:以榆中县中连川乡为例[J]. 地理科学,2015,35(8):952-959.
[18] 赵雪雁,赵海莉,刘春芳. 石羊河下游农户的生计风险及应对策略:以民勤绿洲区为例[J]. 地理研究,2015,34(5):922-932.
[19] 方修琦,殷培红. 弹性、脆弱性和适应:IHDP三个核心概念综述[J]. 地理科学进展,2007,26(5):11-22.
[20] 陈佳,杨新军,尹莎,等. 基于VSD框架的半干旱地区社会-生态系统脆弱性演化与模拟[J]. 地理学报,2016,71(7):1172-1188.
[21] Cumming G S,Barnes G,Perz S,et al. An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience:surrogates for resilience of social-ecological systems[J].Ecosystems,2005,8(8):975-987.
[22] 余中元,李波,张新时. 社会生态系统及脆弱性驱动机制分析[J]. 生态学报,2014,34(7):1870-1879.
[23] Speranza C I,Wiesmann U,Rist S. An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social-ecological dynamics[J]. Global Environmental Change,2014,28(1):109-119.
[24] 张殿发,卞建民. 中国北方农牧交错区土地荒漠化的环境脆弱性机制分析[J]. 干旱区地理,2000,23(2):133-137.
[25] 刘洪来,王艺萌,窦潇,等. 农牧交错带研究进展[J]. 生态学报,2009,29(8):4420-4425.
[26] 孙武,侯玉,张勃. 生态脆弱带波动性、人口压力、脆弱度之间的关系[J]. 生态学报,2000,20(3):369-373.
[27] 赵哈林,赵学勇,张铜会. 北方农牧交错带的地理界定及其生态问题[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(5):739-747.
[28] 蔡博峰,张力小,宋豫秦. 我国北方农牧交错带人地系统脆弱性刍议[J]. 环境保护,2002,7(11):22-23.
[29] 高晓容. 东北地区玉米主要气象灾害风险评估研究[D]. 南京:南京信息工程大学,2012.
[30] 廉毅,王雅君,Lian Y等.中国东北地区土地荒漠化与气候变化研究进展[J]. 地理科学,2007,27(z1):97-102.
[31] 程叶青,张平宇. 中国粮食生产的区域格局变化及东北商品粮基地的响应[J]. 地理科学,2005,25(5):513-520.
[32] 樊琦,祁迪,李霜. 玉米临时收储制度的改革与转型研究[J]. 农业经济问题,2016,37(8):74-81.
[33] 陈玉洁,张平宇,刘世薇,等. 东北西部粮食生产时空格局变化及优化布局研究[J]. 地理科学,2016,36(9):1397-1407.
[34] Roberts M G,杨国安. 可持续发展研究方法国际进展:脆弱性分析方法与可持续生计方法比较[J]. 地理科学进展,2003,22(1):11-21.
[35] Gallopín G C. A systemic synthesis of the relations between vulnerability, hazard, exposure and impact, aimed at policy identification[C]//Economic Commission for Latin American and the Caribbean(ECLAC).Handbook for estimating the socio-economic and environmental effects of disasters:Mexico:ECLAC, 2003:2-5.
[36] 张平宇,李鹤,佟连军,等. 矿业城市人地系统脆弱性[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2011.
[37] 曹宁,曲东,陈新平,等. 东北地区农田土壤氮、磷平衡及其对面源污染的贡献分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2006,34(7):127-133.

Options

文章导航

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献

访问统计

联系我们

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献

访问统计

联系我们