对处理量为50 kg/h的中试尺度喷动流化床反应器内加压煤快速热解过程进行数值模拟。研究反应器高度、煤进料口位置等结构参数以及不同压力（0.1、0.3和0.5 MPa）、射流风与流化风比值（0.2、0.3和0.4）和粒径（0~3和0~6 mm）等操作参数的影响规律。结果表明：升高压力，煤与半焦混合程度降低，煤气产率提高；流化风量Qf不变，随射流风量Qs增加，气固流动更剧烈，颗粒温度分布更加均匀，顶部出口颗量增加；增大粒径虽可降低挥发分出口的颗粒量，但不利于煤与半焦混合。
Numerical simulation of pressurized fast pyrolysis process of coal in a pilot-scale reactor with the capacity of 50 kg/h was carried out. Characteristics of structural parameters, such as reactor height, coal feeding inlet position, pyrolysis pressures (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 MPa), ratios of spouted gas to fluidized gas (0.2, 0.3,and 0.4), and particle size (0-3 and 0-6 mm), were investigated. The results are shown as follows. With the increase of pressure, the mixing of coal and semi-coke became worse while the gas yield increased. Keeping the fluidized gas Qf unchanged, with the increase of spouted gas Qs, the gas-solid flow became more intense, the particle temperature distribution became more uniform, and the particle outflow at the volatile outlet increased. Although increasing particle size reduced the particle outflow at the volatile outlet, it might weaken the mixing of coal and semi-coke.
[1] 甘建平, 马宝岐, 尚建选, 等. 煤炭分质转化理念与路线的形成和发展[J]. 煤化工, 2013,41(1):3-6.
[2] 甘建平, 马晓迅, 尚建选, 等. 煤炭分质转化利用的节能减排分析[J]. 煤化工, 2011, 39(4):1-4.
[3] 虞育杰, 姜红丽, 龚德鸿, 等. 低阶煤分级利用技术研究综述[J]. 广东电力, 2018, 31(3):9-14.
[4] 岑建孟, 方梦祥, 王勤辉, 等. 煤分级利用多联产技术及其发展前景[J]. 化工进展, 2011, 30(1):88-94.
[5] 吕清刚, 刘琦, 那永洁, 等. 双流化床中煤的热解特性试验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2010, 30(8):15-19.
[6] 邓中乙, 肖睿, 金保升, 等. 加压喷动流化床煤气化数值模拟[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2009, 15(4):332-338.
[7] Snider D, Banerjee S. Heterogeneous gas chemistry in the CPFD Eulerian-Lagrangian numerical scheme (ozone decomposition)[J]. Powder Technology, 2010, 199(1):100-106.
[8] O Rourke P J, Snider D M. An improved collision damping time for MP-PIC calculations of dense particle flows with applications to polydisperse sedimenting beds and colliding particle jets[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65(22):6014-6028.
[9] Xie J, Zhong W Q, Jin B S, et al. Eulerian-Lagrangian method for three-dimensional simulation of fluidized bed coal gasification[J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2013,24(1):382-392.
[10] Zhong W Q, Yu A B, Zhou G W, et al. CFD simulation of dense particulate reaction system:approaches, recent advances and applications[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2016, 140(50):16-43.
[11] Xie J, Zhong W Q, Jin B S, et al. Eulerian-Lagrangian method for three-dimensional simulation of fluidized bed coal gasification[J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2013,24(1):382-392.
[12] O'Rourke P J, Snider D M. Inclusion of collisional return-to-isotropy in the MP-PIC method[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2012,80(10):39-54.
[13] Loha C, Chattopadhyay H, Chatterjee P K. Three dimensional kinetic modeling of fluidized bed biomass gasification[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2014,109(16):53-64.
[14] Shao Y J, Liu X J, Zhong W Q, et al. Recent advances of spout-fluid bed:a review of fundamentals and applications[J]. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 2013,11(1):243-258.
[15] Tia S, Bhattacharya S C, Wibulswas P. Combustion behaviour of coal and carbon in spouted and spout-fluid beds[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 1991, 15(3):249-255.
[16] 刘雪娇, 钟文琪, Yu Aibing. 过热蒸汽/热载体/生物质三相混合数值模拟[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2016,37(5):1021-1026.
[17] Liu X J, Zhong W Q, Yu A B, et al. Mixing behaviors in an industrial-scale spout-fluid mixer by 3D CFD-TFM[J]. Powder Technology, 2017, 314:455-465.
[18] 窦元元, 钟文琪, 周冠文, 等. 煤加压低温热解制取焦油和煤气特性[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,48(1):85-91.
