随着数字商业的快速发展，数字创新已成为企业获得竞争优势的关键来源。虽然先前的研究考察了IT-业务联盟对企业绩效的影响，但少有研究探讨其对数字创新的影响。基于资源基础理论，考察不同类型的IT-业务联盟（即知识联盟和社会联盟）如何独立和交互地影响数字创新，并进一步探讨数字业务强度的调节作用。通过对143份中国企业配对问卷的调查研究发现，知识联盟和社会联盟与数字创新之间存在显著的正相关关系，知识联盟和社会联盟之间的交互能够产生协同效应，促进数字创新。此外，数字业务强度正向调节知识联盟与数字创新之间的关系，负向调节社会联盟与数字创新之间的关系。
With the rapid development of digital business, digital innovation has become a critical source for firms to gain competitive advantage. Whilst previous studies have examined the impact of IT-business alignment on firm performance, few studies have explored its impact on digital innovation. Drawing on resource-based view, our study investigates how different types of IT-business alignment (i.e. intellectual and social alignment) affect digital innovation independently and interactively and explores the moderating role of digital business intensity (DBI) further. Using 143 match-paired questionnaires collected from Chinese firms, our results show that intellectual and social alignments are positively associated with digital innovation, and their interactions generate synergistic effects to promote digital innovation. Furthermore, DBI positively and negatively moderates the relationship between intellectual alignment and digital innovation and between social alignment and digital innovation, respectively. Our study also discusses the theoretical and practical implications of the research.
[1] Fichman R G, Dos Santos B L, Zheng Z Q. Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2014, 38(2):329-343.
[2] Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, et al. Digital innovation management:reinventing innovation management research in a digital world[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1):223-238.
[3] Svahn F, Mathiassen L, Lindgren R. Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms:how Volvo cars managed competing concerns[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1):239-253.
[4] Huang R, Zmud R W, Price R L. Influencing the effectiveness of IT governance practices through steering committees and communication policies[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2010, 19(3):288-302.
[5] Yayla A A, Hu Q. The impact of IT-business strategic alignment on firm performance in a developing country setting:exploring moderating roles of environmental uncertainty and strategic orientation[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2012, 21(4):373-387.
[6] Liang H G, Wang N X, Xue Y J, et al. Unraveling the alignment paradox:how does business-IT alignment shape organizational agility?[J]. Information Systems Research, 2017, 28(4):863-879.
[7] Palmer J W, Markus M L. The performance impacts of quick response and strategic alignment in specialty retailing[J]. Information Systems Research, 2000, 11(3):241-259.
[8] Tallon P P, Pinsonneault A. Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility:insights from a mediation model[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2011, 35(2):463-486.
[9] Reich B H, Benbasat I. Measuring the linkage between business and information technology objectives[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1996, 20(1):55-81.
[10] Rajiv S, Sanjiv S, Taha H, et al. How does strategic alignment affect firm performance? The roles of information technology investment and environmental uncertainty[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2019, 43(2):453-474.
[11] Nwankpa J K, Datta P. Balancing exploration and exploitation of IT resources:the influence of Digital Business Intensity on perceived organizational performance[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2017, 26(5):469-488.
[12] Wu S P J, Straub D W, Liang T P. How information technology governance mechanisms and strategic alignment influence organizational performance:insights from a matched survey of business and IT managers[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2015, 39(2):497-518.
[13] Bharadwaj A, El Sawy O A, Pavlou P A, et al. Digital business strategy:toward a next generation of insights[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2013, 37(2):471-482.
[14] Bradley R V, Pratt R M E, Byrd T A, et al. Enterprise architecture, IT effectiveness and the mediating role of IT alignment in US hospitals[J]. Information Systems Journal, 2012, 22(2):97-127.
[15] He Z L, Wong P K. Exploration vs. exploitation:an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(4):481-494.
[16] Oh W, Pinsonneault A. On the assessment of the strategic value of information technologies:conceptual and analytical approaches[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2007, 31(2):239-265.
[17] Preston D S, Karahanna E. Antecedents of IS strategic alignment:a nomological network[J]. Information Systems Research, 2009, 20(2):159-179.
[18] Chan Y E, Reich B H. IT alignment:what have we learned?[J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2007, 22(4):297-315.
[19] Zhou K Z, Li C B. How knowledge affects radical innovation:knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012, 33(9):1090-1102.
[20] Yam R C M, Chan C. Knowledge sharing, commitment and opportunism in new product development[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2015, 35(7):1056-1074.
[21] Li F. The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries:a holistic framework and emerging trends[J]. Technovation, 2020, 92/93:102012.
[22] Li Y, Sun Y, Chen W. Construction of space of information flows and assessment of network resilience from reflexive perspective:a case study of Baidu index in Yangtze River Delta[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 38(1):62-72. "in Chinese".
[23] Armstrong J S, Overton T S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1977, 14(3):396-402.
[24] Podsakoff P M, MacKenzie S B, Lee J Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research:a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(5):879-903.
[25] Lance C E, Butts M M, Michels L C. The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2006, 9(2):202-220.
