欢迎访问中国科学院大学学报,今天是
电子信息与计算机科学

基于视觉感知模型的指纹图像质量评价算法

  • 冯起良 ,
  • 韩丛英 ,
  • 赵彤
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院大学数学科学学院, 北京 100049;
    2. 中国科学院大数据挖掘与知识管理重点实验室, 北京 100190

收稿日期: 2021-12-06

  修回日期: 2022-02-28

  网络出版日期: 2022-02-28

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(U19B2040,11991022,11731013)、中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA27000000)和中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助

Fingerprint image quality evaluation algorithm based on visual perception model

  • FENG Qiliang ,
  • HAN Congying ,
  • ZHAO Tong
Expand
  • 1. School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Big Data Mining and Knowledge Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received date: 2021-12-06

  Revised date: 2022-02-28

  Online published: 2022-02-28

摘要

指纹在刑事侦查和法庭科学领域被称为物证之首,在打击犯罪、维护社会稳定中发挥着十分重要的作用。指纹鉴定的结论是有效证据形成和刑事案件侦破的关键,而指纹图像质量直接影响指纹鉴定结论的准确性和可靠性,因此精准客观的指纹图像质量评价算法是辅助指纹专家进行指纹鉴定必不可少的工具。目前,美国国家标准与技术研究院研发的NFIQ2.0指纹图像质量评价算法得到国内外专家学者的广泛关注,但该算法质量评价结果与指纹专家的质量评价结果存在较大偏差,且缺乏对指纹图像局部区域的质量评价,所以无法满足刑事侦查和法庭科学领域指纹鉴定任务的需要。基于此,将指纹图像质量评价问题拓展到质量空间上,学习指纹专家对纹线局部区域的质量感知策略,提出基于专家感知的质量评价算法。实验结果表明本文算法对指纹图像整体质量评价的结果能够与指纹专家的质量评价结果保持一致,并且符合刑事侦查和法庭科学的应用场景。此外,进一步在国际公开指纹数据集上与NFIQ2.0算法进行对比实验,结果表明本文算法的质量评价分数更为合理,能够有效降低指纹匹配算法的拒识率。

本文引用格式

冯起良 , 韩丛英 , 赵彤 . 基于视觉感知模型的指纹图像质量评价算法[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2023 , 40(6) : 821 -833 . DOI: 10.7523/j.ucas.2022.020

Abstract

Fingerprint is known as the first material evidence in the field of criminal investigation and forensic science, and plays a very important role in combating crime and maintaining social stability. The conclusion of fingerprint identification is the key to the formation of effective evidence and the detection of criminal cases, and the quality of fingerprint image directly affects the accuracy and reliability of fingerprint identification conclusions, so accurate and objective fingerprint image quality evaluation algorithm is an indispensable tool to assist fingerprint experts in fingerprint identification. At present, the NFIQ2.0 fingerprint image quality evaluation algorithm developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has attracted extensive attention from experts and scholars at home and abroad. However, the quality evaluation results of this algorithm deviate greatly from the quality evaluation results of fingerprint experts, and lack of quality evaluation for local areas of fingerprint images. Therefore, it can not meet the needs of criminal investigation and forensic science fingerprint identification tasks. In this paper, the problem of fingerprint image quality evaluation is extended to the quality space, and the quality evaluation algorithm based on expert perception is proposed by learning the quality perception strategy of fingerprint experts for the local area of ridges. The experimental results show that the overall quality evaluation results of the proposed algorithm are consistent with the quality evaluation results of fingerprint experts, and accord with the application scenarios of criminal investigation and forensic science. In addition, this paper further compared with the NFIQ2.0 algorithm on several international public fingerprint data sets, and the results show that the quality evaluation score of the proposed algorithm is more reasonable, and can effectively reduce false non-match rate (FNMR) of the fingerprint matching algorithm.

参考文献

[1] Maltoni D, Maio D, Jain A K, et al. Handbook of fingerprint recognition[M]. London:Springer London, 2009. DOI:10.1007/978-1-84882-254-2.
[2] Jain A K, Ross A, Prabhakar S. An introduction to biometric recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2004, 14(1):4-20. DOI:10.1109/TCSVT.2003.818349.
[3] Bolle R M, Pankanti S U, Yao Y S. System and method for determining the quality of fingerprint images:US5963656[P]. 1999-10-05.
[4] Shen L L, Kot A, Koo W M. Quality measures of fingerprint images[C]//International Conference on Audio-and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001:266-271. DOI:10.1007/3-540-45344-X_39.
[5] Tabassi E, Wilson C L, Watson C I. Fingerprint image quality[R]. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2004. DOI:10.6028/nist.ir.7151.
[6] ANSI. ISO/IEC 29794-1:2009:Information technology-Biometric sample quality-Part 1:Framework[EB/OL].(2009-08)[2022-01-22]. https://www.iso.org/standard/43583.html.
[7] ANSI. ISO/IEC TR 29794-4:2010:Information technology-Biometric sample quality-Part 4:Finger image data[EB/OL]. (2010-04)[2022-01-22]. https://www.iso.org/standard/50911.html.
[8] ANSI. ISO/IEC 29794-4:2017:Information technology-Biometric sample quality-Part 4:Finger image data[EB/OL]. (2017-09)[2022-01-22]. https://www.iso.org/standard/62791.html.
[9] NIST. Development of NFIQ 2.0[EB/OL]. (2014-04)[2022-01-22]. http://www.nist.gov/itl/iad/ig/development_nfiq_2.cfm.
[10] Li X, Wang R X, Li M Q, et al. A hybrid quality estimation algorithm for fingerprint images[C]//Biometric Recognition, 2016:214-223. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-46654-5_24.
[11] Richter R, Gottschlich C, Mentch L, et al. Smudge noise for quality estimation of fingerprints and its validation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2019, 14(8):1963-1974. DOI:10.1109/TIFS.2018.2889258.
[12] Chen C H, An C S, Chen C Y. Fingerprint quality assessment based on texture and geometric features[J]. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, 2020, 64(4):40403-1-40403-7. DOI:10.2352/j.imagingsci.technol.2020.64.4.040403.
[13] Agarwal D, Bansal A. Assessment of latent fingerprint image quality based on level 1, level 2, and texture features[C]//International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications, 2021:489-501. DOI:10.1007/978-981-15-5113-0_38.
[14] Hendre M, Patil S, Abhyankar A. Utility of quality metrics in partial fingerprint recognition[J]. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, 2021, 10(1):839-849. DOI:10.12785/ijcds/100177.
[15] 中华人民共和国公安部. 指纹特征规范第5部分:指纹细节特征点标志方法:GA 774.5-2008[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2008.
[16] 中华人民共和国公安部. 十指指纹图像数据复现动态链接库接口:GA 785-2008[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2008.
[17] 中华人民共和国公安部. 居民身份证指纹采集和比对技术规范:GA/T 1012-2019[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2012.
[18] 江璐, 赵彤, 吴敏. 基于深度卷积神经网络的指纹纹型分类算法[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2016, 33(6):808-814. DOI:10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2016.06.013.
[19] Qin J, Han C Y, Bai C C, et al. Multi-scaling detection of singular points basedon fully convolutional networks in fingerprint images[C]//Biometric Recognition, 2017:221-230. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-69923-3_24.
[20] Li J, Feng J J, Kuo C C J. Deep convolutional neural network for latent fingerprint enhancement[J]. Signal Processing:Image Communication, 2018, 60:52-63. DOI:10.1016/j.image.2017.08.010.
[21] Liu Y H, Zhou B C, Han C Y, et al. A method for singular points detection based on faster-RCNN[J]. Applied Sciences, 2018, 8(10):1853. DOI:10.3390/app8101853.
[22] Zhou B C, Han C Y, Liu Y H, et al. Fast minutiae extractor using neural network[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2020, 103:107273. DOI:10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107273.
[23] Liu Y H, Zhou B C, Han C Y, et al. A novel method based on deep learning for aligned fingerprints matching[J]. Applied Intelligence, 2020, 50(2):397-416. DOI:10.1007/s10489-019-01530-4.
[24] He K M, Zhang X Y, Ren S Q, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]//2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. June 27-30, 2016, Las Vegas, NV, USA. IEEE, 2016:770-778. DOI:10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.
[25] Huang G, Liu Z, van der Maaten L, et al. Densely connected convolutional networks[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. July 21-26, 2017, Honolulu, HI, USA. IEEE, 2017:2261-2269. DOI:10.1109/CVPR.2017.243.
[26] Kingma D P, Ba J. Adam:a method for stochastic optimization[EB/OL]. arXiv:1412.6980v9[cs.LG]. (2017-01-30)[2022-01-22]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980.
[27] Gonzalez R C, Woods R E. Digital image processing[M]. 2nd ed. New Jersey:Prentice Hall, 2002.
[28] Kass M, Witkin A. Analyzing oriented patterns[J]. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 1987, 37(3):362-385. DOI:10.1016/0734-189X(87)90043-0.
[29] Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1979, 9(1):62-66. DOI:10.1109/tsmc.1979.4310076.
[30] Suzuki S, be K. Topological structural analysis of digitized binary images by border following[J]. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 1985, 30(1):32-46. DOI:10.1016/0734-189X(85)90016-7.
[31] Maio D, Maltoni D, Cappelli R, et al. FVC2000:fingerprint verification competition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2002, 24(3):402-412. DOI:10.1109/34.990140.
[32] Maio D, Maltoni D, Cappelli R, et al. FVC2002:second fingerprint verification competition[C]//2002 International Conference on Pattern Recognition. August 11-15, 2002, Quebec City, QC, Canada. IEEE, 2002:811-814. DOI:10.1109/ICPR.2002.1048144.
[33] Watson C I, Garris M D, Tabassi E, et al. User's guide to NIST biometric image software (NBIS)[R]. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2007. DOI:10.6028/nist.ir.7392.
[34] Watson C I, Wilson C L. NIST special database 4:fingerprint database[R/OL]. National Institute of Standards and Technology (1992-03-17)[2022-01-22]. http://www.informatik.uni-ulm.de/ni/Lehre/SS03/ENIPRAKT/nist_sd4.pdf.
文章导航

/