欢迎访问中国科学院大学学报，今天是
RSS English

中国科学院大学学报 >

2025 , Vol. 42 >Issue 4: 460 - 471

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7523/j.ucas.2023.087

环境科学与地理学

从生态系统服务到决策的过程链——基于671篇中文文献的分析

  • 陈沛媛 ,
  • 黄庆旭 ,
  • 何春阳 ,
  • 张金茜 ,
  • 周昱辰 ,
  • 白岩松
展开
  • 1. 北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100875;
    2. 北京师范大学地理科学学部自然资源学院, 北京 100875;
    3. 北京师范大学环境演变与自然灾害教育部重点实验室, 北京 100875;
    4. 北京师范大学应急管理部-教育部减灾与应急管理研究院, 北京 100875;
    5. 北京师范大学地理科学学部, 北京 100875

收稿日期: 2023-06-27

  修回日期: 2023-11-02

  网络出版日期: 2023-11-02

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(41971225)和唐仲英基金会资助

收起

Process chain from ecosystem services to decision making： an analysis based on 671 Chinese literatures

  • CHEN Peiyuan ,
  • HUANG Qingxu ,
  • HE Chunyang ,
  • ZHANG Jinxi ,
  • ZHOU Yuchen ,
  • BAI Yansong
Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Process and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875, China;
    2. College of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster(Ministry of Education), Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875, China;
    4. Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Ministry of Emergency Management & Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875, China;
    5. Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875, China

Received date: 2023-06-27

  Revised date: 2023-11-02

  Online published: 2023-11-02

Fold

摘要

利用荟萃分析方法，以1997—2021年间发表的生态系统服务主题的671篇中文论文为例，根据生态系统服务到决策的4要素过程链，定量和定性分析现有研究关注的主要过程链类型，并讨论未来的研究挑战。结果发现，生态系统服务虽受追捧，但完整纳入决策链过程的研究尚少。超过2/3的论文关注了过程链中1~2个要素，有2%的论文包含将生态系统服务应用于决策的完整过程链。生态系统服务在国家尺度的研究较少，对利益相关者的关注较薄弱。在生态调节要素上，粮食产量、生物量和植被净初级生产力是高频考虑因素。在社会经济调节因素上，粮食价格、GDP和人口是高频考虑因素。未来在将生态系统服务应用于决策的过程中，需要在生态系统服务评估方法的标准化、局地优化、时空尺度选择、利益相关者和公众参与以及情景分析上进一步加强，为指导实践和政策制定提供有力支撑。

关键词： 生态系统服务; 规划; 决策支撑; 生态和社会经济; 可持续发展

本文引用格式

陈沛媛 , 黄庆旭 , 何春阳 , 张金茜 , 周昱辰 , 白岩松 . 从生态系统服务到决策的过程链——基于671篇中文文献的分析[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2025 , 42(4) : 460 -471 . DOI: 10.7523/j.ucas.2023.087

Abstract

Ecosystem services (ES) are the bridge connecting ecosystems and social systems, and have gradually become an important basis for decision-making. To this end, this paper reviews the progresses of applying ecosystem service in decision-making by randomly selecting 1 000 Chinese papers on the topic of ecosystem service from 1997 to 2021. According to the four-element process chain from ecosystem service to decision making, this paper quantitatively and qualitatively analyzes the main types of process chains that the existing research focuses on, analyzes the content of process chains from two aspects of salience and legitimacy of ES information, and discusses the future research challenges. We found that although ecosystem services are highly sought after, there are few studies that fully integrate them into the process chain of decision-making. More than two thirds of the papers focused on one or two elements of the process chain, and 2% of the papers included a complete process chain for applying ecosystem services to decision-making. Regarding the salience of ES information, there are few studies at the national scale. In terms of legitimacy, the focus on stakeholders is weak. In terms of ecological regulatory factors, grain yield, biomass, and net primary productivity of vegetation are high-frequency considerations. In terms of socio-economic regulatory factors, food prices, GDP, and population are high-frequency considerations. In the future, in the process of applying ecosystem services to decision-making, it is necessary to further strengthen the standardization and local optimization of ecosystem service assessment methods, spatial and temporal scale selection, enhance stakeholder and public participation, and adopt scenario analysis to provide strong support for guiding practice and policy formulation.

Key words： ecosystem service; planning; decision support; ecology and socio-economics; sustainable development

参考文献

[1] Daily G C. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M]. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1997.
[2] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis[M]. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005.
[3] 傅伯杰, 周国逸, 白永飞, 等. 中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(6): 571-576. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn: 1001-8166.2009.06.001.
[4] de Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(3): 393-408. DOI: 10.1016/ S0921-8009(02)00089-7.
[5] Helliwell D R. Valuation of wildlife resources[J]. Regional Studies, 1969, 3(1): 41-47. DOI: 10.1080/ 09595236900185051.
[6] Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260. DOI: 10.1038/ 387253a0.
[7] 欧阳志云, 王如松, 赵景柱. 生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 1999, 10(5): 635-640. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.1999.0166.
[8] 陈仲新, 张新时. 中国生态系统效益的价值[J]. 科学通报, 2000, 45(1): 17-22, 113. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn: 0023-074X.2000.01.004.
[9] 谢高地, 肖玉, 鲁春霞. 生态系统服务研究: 进展、局限和基本范式[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(2): 191-199. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0028.
[10] 赵景柱, 肖寒, 吴刚. 生态系统服务的物质量与价值量评价方法的比较分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2000, 11(2): 290-292. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332. 2000.0076.
[11] 李晶, 李红艳, 张良. 关中—天水经济区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(10): 3053-3062. DOI: 10.5846 / stxb201408261688.
[12] 傅伯杰, 于丹丹, 吕楠. 中国生物多样性与生态系统服务评估指标体系[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(2): 341-348. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201611092273.
[13] 李双成, 谢爱丽, 吕春艳, 等. 土地生态系统服务研究进展及趋势展望[J]. 中国土地科学, 2018, 32(12): 82-89. DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20181123.103632.
[14] 张潆文, 苏腾, 张富刚, 等. 新时期我国国土空间生态修复理念与模式探讨[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1573-1580. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202105.016.
[15] 欧阳志云, 郑华, 谢高地, 等. 生态资产、生态补偿及生态文明科技贡献核算理论与技术[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(22): 7136-7139. DOI: 10.5846/ stxb201611142310.
[16] 刘紫玟, 尹丹, 黄庆旭, 等. 生态系统服务在土地利用规划研究和应用中的进展: 基于文献计量和文本分析法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(2): 236-247. DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.02.007.
[17] 陈春谛. 基于文献计量分析的生态系统服务研究：从理论研究到实践应用[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(14): 6030-6039. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202108222340.
[18] Mandle L, Shields-Estrada A, Chaplin-Kramer R, et al. Increasing decision relevance of ecosystem service science[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4(2): 161-169. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-00625-y.
[19] Liu L M, Wu J G. Scenario analysis in urban ecosystem services research: progress, prospects, and implications for urban planning and management[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2022, 224: 104433. DOI: 10.1016/ j.landurbplan.2022.104433.
[20] Wu J G. Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2013, 28(6): 999-1023. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9.
[21] Cash D W, Clark W C, Alcock F, et al. Knowledge systems for sustainable development[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003, 100(14): 8086-8091. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1231332100.
[22] Posner S M, McKenzie E, Ricketts T H. Policy impacts of ecosystem services knowledge[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113(7): 1760-1765. DOI: 10.1073/ pnas.1502452113.
[23] Wright W C C, Eppink F V, Greenhalgh S. Are ecosystem service studies presenting the right information for decision making?[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 25: 128-139. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser. 2017.03.002.
[24] Potschin-Young M, Haines-Young R, Görg C, et al. Understanding the role of conceptual frameworks: reading the ecosystem service cascade[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 29: 428-440. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser. 2017.05.015.
[25] Haines-Young R, Potschin-Young M. Revision of the common international classification for ecosystem services (CICES V5.1): a policy brief[J]. One Ecosystem, 2018, 3: e27108. DOI: 10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108.
[26] 李双成, 王珏, 朱文博, 等. 基于空间与区域视角的生态系统服务地理学框架[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(11): 1628-1639. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201411004.
[27] 马桥, 刘康, 高艳, 等. 基于SolVES模型的西安浐灞国家湿地公园生态系统服务社会价值评估 [J]. 湿地科学, 2018, 16(1): 51-58. DOI:10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2018.01.009.
[28] 张锐, 刘焱序, 赵嵩, 等. 中国城市居民对青藏高原生态资产的支付意愿: 以中国27市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 563-575. DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb. 20200305.
[29] 陈晓舒, 赵同谦, 李聪, 等. 基于不同利益相关者的水电能源基地建设经济损益研究: 以澜沧江干流为例[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(13): 4495-4504. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201504100725.
[30] 李梦桃, 周忠学. 西安市城市景观的正负生态系统服务测算及空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(7): 1215-1230. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201607010.
[31] 殷莎, 赵永华, 韩磊, 等. 秦岭森林生态系统服务价值的时空演变[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(12): 3777-3786. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201612.023.
[32] Vogl A L, Bryant B P, Hunink J E, et al. Valuing investments in sustainable land management in the Upper Tana River Basin, Kenya[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 195: 78-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.013.
[33] 熊鹰, 孙维筠, 魏晓, 等. 南方丘陵山地生态系统服务与农村社区协同发展模式研究: 以广东乐昌市8个乡村为例[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(18): 6505-6521. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201911142420.
[34] Ouyang Z Y, Song C S, Zheng H, et al. Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020, 117(25): 14593-14601. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1911439117.
[35] Olander L P, Johnston R J, Tallis H, et al. Benefit relevant indicators: ecosystem services measures that link ecological and social outcomes[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 85: 1262-1272. DOI: 10.1016/ j.ecolind.2017.12.001.
[36] Dawson N, Martin A. Assessing the contribution of ecosystem services to human wellbeing: a disaggregated study in western Rwanda[J]. Ecological Economics, 2015, 117: 62-72. DOI: 10.1016/ j.ecolecon.2015.06.018.
[37] 任婷婷, 周忠学. 农业结构转型对生态系统服务与人类福祉的影响: 以西安都市圈两种农业类型为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(7): 2353-2365. DOI: 10.5846/ stxb201803050434.
[38] 傅伯杰.地理学：从知识、科学到决策[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(11)：1923-1932. DOI: 10.11821/ dlxb201711001.
[39] 陈利顶, 吕一河, 赵文武, 等. 区域生态学的特点、学科定位及其与相邻学科的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(13): 4593-4601. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201901040037.
[40] 吕永龙, 王一超, 苑晶晶, 等. 关于中国推进实施可持续发展目标的若干思考[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境，2018, 28(1): 1-9. DOI: 10.12062/cpre.20171225.
[41] 殷楠, 王帅, 刘焱序. 生态系统服务价值评估: 研究进展与展望[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(1): 233-244. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202101.025.
[42] Jiang W, Wu T, Fu B J. The value of ecosystem services in China: a systematic review for twenty years[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2021, 52: 101365. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101365.
[43] 孙宝娣, 于德湖, 崔东旭. 流域生态系统服务和水土资源匹配研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(10): 4308-4318. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202205171398.
[44] 郑华, 欧阳志云, 赵同谦, 等. 人类活动对生态系统服务功能的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(1): 118-126. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn: 1000-3037.2003.01.018.
[45] 傅伯杰, 张立伟. 土地利用变化与生态系统服务: 概念、方法与进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4): 441-446. DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001.
[46] Media release: IPBES values assessment: decisions based on narrow set of market values of nature underpin the global biodiversity crisis[EB/OL]. [2022-07-11]. https://ipbes.net/media_release/Values_Assessment_Published.
[47] 王培家, 章锦河, 徐冬, 等. 国外土地生态系统服务研究进展及其对国内的启示[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2023, 39(4): 77-85. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0504.2023.04.011.
[48] Peng J, Hu X X, Wang X Y, et al. Simulating the impact of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services trade-offs in Northwestern Yunnan, China[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2019, 39: 100998. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100998.
[49] Wu J G. Landscape sustainability science (II): core questions and key approaches[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36(8): 2453-2485. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-021-01245-3.
[50] 彭建, 杨旸, 谢盼, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需的广东省绿地生态网络建设分区[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(13): 4562-4572. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201601020007.
[51] 孟凡迪, 周智, 张贵军, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需与生态恢复力的国土空间生态修复分区: 以京津冀为例[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2023, 31(9): 1496-1510. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20230010.
[52] Grunewald K, Bastian O, Louda J, et al. Lessons learned from implementing the ecosystem services concept in urban planning[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2021, 49: 101273. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101273.
[53] Zhang Y M, Li J, Zhou Z X. Exploring expedient protected area for ecosystem services: decision-making method with a new algorithm[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(20): 5599. DOI: 10.3390/su11205599.
[54] Ruckelshaus M, McKenzie E, Tallis H, et al. Notes from the field: lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions[J]. Ecological Economics, 2015, 115: 11-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009.
[55] 张宇硕, 刘博宇, 毕旭, 等. 基于利益相关者感知视角的生态系统服务研究进展[J]. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(5): 1300-1317. DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20230512.
[56] Turner W R, Brandon K, Brooks T M, et al. Global biodiversity conservation and the alleviation of poverty[J]. BioScience, 2012, 62(1): 85-92. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.13.
[57] Peng J, Xia P, Liu Y X, et al. Ecosystem services research: from golden era to next crossing[J]. Transactions in Earth, Environment, and Sustainability, 2023, 1(1): 9-19. DOI: 10.1177/2754124x231165935.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

首页 | 期刊介绍 | 编委会 | 投稿指南 | 期刊浏览 | 期刊订阅 | 联系我们

版权所有 © 《中国科学院大学学报》编辑部

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发

技术支持：support@magtech.com.cn

访问统计

总访问量： 今日访问： 当前在线：

联系我们

通讯地址：北京玉泉路19号（甲）中国科学院大学科研楼410

联系电话:（010）88256013