欢迎访问中国科学院大学学报,今天是
环境科学与地理学

地理环境对先秦时期海岱地区人居聚落选址营建的影响

  • 韩卫然 ,
  • 严少飞 ,
  • 蒋苑 ,
  • 陈旭 ,
  • 刘欣然
展开
  • 1.西安建筑科技大学建筑学院,西安 710055
    2.西安建筑科技大学中国城乡建设与文化传承研究院,西安 710055
    3.西安建筑科技大学交叉创新研究院,西安 710055

收稿日期: 2023-11-16

  修回日期: 2024-06-03

  网络出版日期: 2024-06-11

基金资助

“十四五”国家重点研发计划课题(2022YFC3803503);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(21YJC760026)

Influence of geographical environment on site selection and construction of residential settlements of Haidai Region in Pre-Qin Period

  • Weiran HAN ,
  • Shaofei YAN ,
  • Yuan JIANG ,
  • Xu CHEN ,
  • Xinran LIU
Expand
  • 1.School of Architecture,Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology,Xi’an 710055,China
    2.China Urban Rural Construction and Cultural Heritage Research Institute,Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology,Xi’an 710055,China
    3.Cross Innovation Research Institute,Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology,Xi’an 710055,China

Received date: 2023-11-16

  Revised date: 2024-06-03

  Online published: 2024-06-11

摘要

以海岱地区为研究区域,广泛收集区域内先秦时期的人居聚落遗址点并建立数据库,结合SRTM DEM数据,利用ArcGIS 10.7软件对先秦时期(600~2.1 ka BP)9448处人居聚落遗址的高程、坡度、坡向、河流水系等地理因素进行分析,探索该区域内遗址点时空分布与地理环境的关系。结果表明:1)先秦时期海岱地区的人居聚落发展经历了一个高程上由高到低、地形上由山地至平地、空间分布上由少到多短期回落后再次增长的历史过程。2)各时期遗址点空间分布特征基本一致,主要分布于海拔0~150 m的高程区间,以0~50 m区间最为集中,并且均倾向于2°~15°的起伏坡度,以15°以内的平地至斜坡最为集中,且遗址点集中分布于平地(-1°)和东南至西南(112.5°~247.5°)的坡向区间。3)先秦时期海岱地区日常人居活动半径约为3~4 km,人居聚落选址与河流紧密相连。综合来看,地理环境对各时期遗址点的分布变化影响密切,也反映出先秦时期海岱先民对地理环境的空间认知与利用已具有较高水平。

本文引用格式

韩卫然 , 严少飞 , 蒋苑 , 陈旭 , 刘欣然 . 地理环境对先秦时期海岱地区人居聚落选址营建的影响[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2026 , 43(4) : 496 -506 . DOI: 10.7523/j.ucas.2024.060

Abstract

Taking Haidai region as the study area, this paper analyzes the elevation, slope, slope direction, river system, and other geographical factors of 9 448 residential settlement sites in Pre-Qin Period (600-2.1 ka BP), and explores the relationship between the spatial-temporal distribution of the sites and geographical environment, by collecting the residential settlement sites of Pre-Qin Period extensively and establishing a database of the region, combining with SRTM DEM data, and using ArcGIS 10.7. Results show that: 1) The development of human settlements in the Haidai Region during the Pre-Qin Period went through a historical process of elevation from high to low, terrain from mountainous to flat, spatial distribution from small to large, then decreasing and continuing to increase. 2) The spatial distribution characteristics of archaeological sites in different periods are basically consistent. Archaeological sites mainly distributed in the elevation range of 0-150 m above sea level, with the range of 0-50 m being the most concentrated and inclined towards undulating slopes of 2°-15°. The range from flat land to slopes within 15° is the most concentrated, and archaeological sites are concentrated in the slope direction range of flat land (-1°) and southeast to southwest (112.5°-247.5°). 3)The daily human activity radius of Haidai Region in Pre-Qin Period is about 3-4 km, and the residential settlement sites are closely connected with the river. Overall, the geographical environment has a close influence on the distribution and changes of site locations across different periods, also reflecting that the spatial cognition and utilization of the geographical environment by the predecessors in the Haidai Region during the Pre-Qin Period were already at a relatively high level.

参考文献

[1] 栾丰实.简论大汶口和龙山文化之间的过渡期遗存[J].江汉考古2021(6):52-61.
[2] 刘文强.史前东方地区联盟活动的考古学观察[J]. 中原文物2020(6):74-83.
[3] 毕经纬,杨欢.随葬品摆放规则初步研究:以海岱地区东周墓葬为例[J].华夏考古2016(2):53-60. DOI:10.16143/j.cnki.1001-9928.2016.02.007 .
[4] 王震中.夷夏互化融合说[J].中国社会科学2022(1):132-157,207.
[5] 江林昌,李笑笑.黄河改道与中华早期文明的形成[J].民俗研究2021(6):14-24,158. DOI:10.13370/j.cnki.fs.2021.06.003 .
[6] 崔宗亮.裴李岗文化对海岱地区的影响[J].南方文物2021(2):188-193. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-6275.2021.02.026 .
[7] Underhill A P, Cunnar G E, Luan F S, et al. Urbanization in the eastern seaboard (Haidai) area of Northern China: perspectives from the late Neolithic site of Liangchengzhen[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology202162: 101288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaa.2021.101288 .
[8] 郭荣臻.岳石文化城邑的考古学观察[J].四川文物2021(5):28-39.
[9] 郭荣臻,曹凌子.海岱地区史前城防体系的考古学观察[J].临沂大学学报201739(3):17-33. DOI:10.13950/j.cnki.jlu.2017.03.003 .
[10] 孙瑞祺,骆磊,王心源,等.汉长城烽燧选址的地理因子探究:以玉门市为例[J].中国科学院大学学报202340(1):50-58.DOI:10.7523/j.ucas.2021.0030 .
[11] 公雪霜,于丽君,聂跃平,等.辽宁西部地区先秦时期聚落遗址空间格局分析[J].中国科学院大学学报201633(3):373-379.DOI:10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2016.03.014 .
[12] 刘帅,邹春辉,毛龙江,等.山东省旧石器—商周时期古遗址时空分布及其与水文地貌的关系[J].第四纪研究202141(5):1394-1407.
[13] Li K F, Zhu C, Jiang F Q,et al. Archaeological sites distribution and its physical environmental settings between ca 260-2.2 ka BP in Guizhou, Southwest China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences201424(3):526-538. DOI:10.1007/s11442-014-1104-4 .
[14] 尤联元,杨景春.中国地貌[M].北京:科学出版社,2013.
[15] 景高了,揭毅,景才瑞.中国地学通鉴:地貌卷[M].西安:陕西师范大学出版总社,2018.
[16] 郭永盛.历史上山东湖泊的变迁[J].海洋湖沼通报1990(3):15-22.DOI:10.13984/j.cnki.cn37-1141.1990.03.003 .
[17] 吕遵谔,黄蕴平,李平生,等.山东沂源猿人化石[J].人类学学报19898(4):301-313,390-392.DOI:10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.1989.04.002 .
[18] 国家文物局.中国文物地图集:山东分册[M].北京:中国地图出版社,2007.
[19] 国家文物局 主编.中国文物地图集:江苏分册[M].北京:中国地图出版社,2008.
[20] 国家文物局.中国文物地图集:河南分册[M].北京:中国地图出版社, 1991.
[21] 国家文物局.中国文物地图集:安徽分册[M].北京:中国地图出版社,2014.
[22] 靳桂云,王传明.海岱地区新石器时代气候与环境[J].古地理学报201012(3):355-363.DOI:10.7605/gdlxb.2010.03.011 .
[23] 吴文祥,刘东生.4000aB.P.前后东亚季风变迁与中原周围地区新石器文化的衰落[J].第四纪研究200424(3):278-284.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-7410.2004.03.006 .
[24] 张祖陆,聂晓红,卞学昌.山东小清河流域湖泊的环境变迁[J].古地理学报2004.6(2):226-233.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1505.2004.02.011 .
[25] 郭佳馨.全新世气候变化对海岱地区新石器时代文化的影响[J]. 中国民族博览2020(22): 227-229. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4198.2020.22.076 .
[26] 杨林,裴安平,郭宁宁,等.洛阳地区史前聚落遗址空间形态研究[J].地理科学201232(8):993-999.DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2012.08.010 .
[27] Kohler T A, Parker S C. Predictive models for archaeological resource location[M]//Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1986: 397-452. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-003109-2.50011-8 .
[28] 管仲.管子[M]. 吴文涛,张善良,编.北京:燕山出版社,1995.
[29] 丁敏,彭淑贞,庞奖励,等.山东中部全新世环境演变与人类文化发展[J].土壤通报201142(6):1281-1287. DOI:10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2011.06.001 .
文章导航

/