二氧化铀热导率的实验及数值模拟研究评价

doi:10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2009.3.017

中国科学院大学学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 415-418.DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2009.3.017

二氧化铀热导率的实验及数值模拟研究评价

王增辉, 黄潇凤

中国科学院研究生院物理科学学院, 北京100049

收稿日期:2008-05-08 修回日期:2008-11-05 发布日期:2009-05-15
基金资助:
中国科学院研究生院院长基金资助

Experiment and numerical simulation of thermal conductivity of uranium dioxide

WANG Zeng-Hui, HUANG Xiao-Feng

College of Physical Sciences, Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2008-05-08 Revised:2008-11-05 Published:2009-05-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

二氧化铀是一种稳定的陶瓷燃料,它具有熔点高和物理化学性质稳定的特性,作为核燃料二氧化铀的导热性能将直接影响核燃料芯块内的温度分布和芯块中心的最高温度,分析比较了二氧化铀热导率的实验研究结果和关联式,发现已有实验结果间的差异已经缩小.通过开展非平衡分子动力学模拟分析表明,二氧化铀热导率在中温区模拟较为准确可靠.在低温区时,需对能量输运粒子的动能计算进行量子修正;在高温区,需建立声子能量输运模型、电子气能量输运模型和光子辐射部分的能量输运模型,进一步建立二氧化铀的热导率计算程序.

关键词: 二氧化铀, 热导率, 分子动力学

Abstract:

Uranium dioxide is a kind of steady nuclear fuel that has the characteristic of high melting point and steady property. The thermal conductivity of uranium dioxide can directly influence the temperature distribution of nuclear fuel and the max temperature of the center of nuclear fuel. The experimental results and expression of thermal conductivity have been compared in the paper. The deviation between the experiment results has decreased. The non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulation results are in good agreement with the experiment results in medium temperature region. In low temperature region, it is necessary to add the quantum correction to the kinetic energy computation of phonon. In high temperature region, it is needed to use the accurate potential model and build up the electron gas energy transport model and photon radiation energy transport to study the thermal conductivity well and truly for the nuclear reactor safety design and uranium dioxide engineering application.

Key words: uranium dioxide, thermal conductivity, molecular dynamics

中图分类号:

TK121

王增辉, 黄潇凤. 二氧化铀热导率的实验及数值模拟研究评价[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2009, 26(3): 415-418.

WANG Zeng-Hui, HUANG Xiao-Feng. Experiment and numerical simulation of thermal conductivity of uranium dioxide[J]. , 2009, 26(3): 415-418.

参考文献

[1] Harding JH, Martin DG, Potter PE. Thermophysical and thermochemical properties of fast reactor materials. Commission of European Communities Report EUR 12402.1989

[2] Lucuta PG, Matzke HJ. Hastigns IJ. A pragmatic approach to modeling thermal conductivity of irradiated UO2 fuel: review and recommendations. J Nucl Mater, 1996,232:166~180

[3] Lucuta PG, et al. Thermal conductivity of SIMFUEL. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 1992,188:198~204

[4] Wiesenack W. Assessment of UO2 conductivity degradation based on in-pile temperature data.In:Proc International Topical Meeting on Light Water Reactor Fuel Performance. Portland, Oregon, 1997,3:2~6

[5] Ronchi C, Sheindlin M, Musella M, et al. Thermal conductivity of uranium dioxide up to 2900 K from simultaneous measurement of heat capacity and thermal diffusivity. Journal of Applied Physics, 1999,85(2):776~789

[6] Fink JK.Thermophysical properties of uranium dioxide. Journal of Nuclear Materials,2000,279:1~18

[7] Watanabe T, Sinnott SB, Tulenko JS, et al. Thermal transport properties of uranium dioxide by molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Nuclear Materials,2008,375:388~396

[8] Jean-Paul Crocombette, Dominique Ghaleb. Molecular dynamics modeling of irradiation damage in pure and uranium-doped zircon. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2001,295:167~178

[9] Chandra Bhanu Basak. Classical molecular dynamics simulation of uranium monocarbide UC. Computational Materials Science, 2007,40:562~568

[10] Higuchi S. Proc of fall meeting of the atomic energy society of Japan. Okinawa, Published by Atomic Energy Society of Japan, 1997,697: 14~17

[11] Kazuhiro Yamada, Ken Kurosaki, Msayoshi Uno, et al. Evaluation of thermal properties of uranium dioxide by molecular dynamics. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2000,307:10~16

[12] Terentyev D. Molecular dynamics study of oxygen transport and thermal properties of mixed oxide fuels. Computational Materials Science,2007,40:319~326

[13] Wang ZH, Li ZX. Lattice dynamics analysis of thermal conductivity in silicon nanoscale film. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2006,26(17-18):2063~2066

[14] Kawamura K. Molecular dynamics simulations. Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, 1992,103:88

[15] Hobson IC, Taylor R, Ainscough JB. Effect of porosity and stoichiometry on the thermal conductivity of uranium dioxide. J Phys D: Appl Phys,1974,7:1003~1015

二氧化铀热导率的实验及数值模拟研究评价

Experiment and numerical simulation of thermal conductivity of uranium dioxide

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

访问统计

联系我们

[1]	高金爱, 崔巍. 细胞穿膜肽S4(13)与质膜相互作用的分子动力学模拟[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2021, 38(6): 758-771.
[2]	张玉杰, 李晓毅. 细胞色素c与富勒烯衍生物的吸附相互作用[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2019, 36(4): 567-569.
[3]	黄须啟, 李晓毅. DNA与B-PDEAEA自组装过程的分子动力学模拟[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2018, 35(4): 487-491.
[4]	潘俊, 胡中波. 吸附在Au(100)、Au(110)和Au(111)表面的CTAB双分子层的结构和动力学性质的分子模拟[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2017, 34(1): 38-49.
[5]	王凤圣. 骨形态发生蛋白2在带电自组装单层膜上的吸附[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2017, 34(1): 55-63.
[6]	张超, 王跃社, 李晨沛. 离子诱导水蒸气核化过程的分子动力学模拟[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2016, 33(2): 228-233.
[7]	张驰, 黄须啟, 李晓毅. 细胞色素c与氧化石墨烯的吸附研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2016, 33(1): 70-74.
[8]	刘在荣, 张志刚. 地幔条件下碳酸钙熔体的密度与压缩性[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2015, 32(3): 356-362.
[9]	张龙艳, 王增辉. 液态金属热输运过程的分子动力学模拟[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2015, 32(1): 25-30.
[10]	徐先锋, 唐大伟. 薄膜材料热物性测量的FDTR信号敏感度比较[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2014, 31(1): 32-37.
[11]	葛振朋, 李晓毅. 管径和氮掺杂对纳米管中氧气分子传输的影响[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2014, 31(1): 135-138.
[12]	王增辉, 赵凯璇, 倪明玖. 固体材料导热系数的分子动力学模拟[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2012, 29(5): 599-604.
[13]	刘广, 李良, 赵润宁, 陈杭, 李丹, 韩聚广. MCL-1及其BH3 螺旋结合自由能计算研究蛋白-蛋白相互作用原理[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2012, 29(5): 605-613.
[14]	杜怀亮, 李晓毅. 钻孔石墨烯用于氢气和氮气分离的分子动力学模拟[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2012, (3): 312-315.
[15]	许叶春, 蒋华良. 老年痴呆相关蛋白靶标结构与功能关系的分子动力学模拟[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2009, 26(2): 280-287.