欢迎访问中国科学院大学学报,今天是

中国科学院大学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 633-641.DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2019.05.009

• 环境科学与地理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

黑龙江省西部垦区与农区耕地利用效益比较分析

潘晓卉1,2, 张平宇1, 刘世薇1, 初楠臣1,2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所, 长春 130102;
    2. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-23 修回日期:2018-06-26 发布日期:2019-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 张平宇
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(41601124,41571152,41771179),中国科学院重点部署项目(ZDBS-SSW-SQC,KFZD-SW-314,KSZD-EW-Z-021-03)和中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所“一三五”规划与特色所服务项目(Y6H2091001,IGA-135-04)资助

Comparative analysis on the benefits of cultivated land use between the reclamation areas and rural areas in western part of Heilongjiang Province

PAN Xiaohui1,2, ZHANG Pingyu1, LIU Shiwei1, CHU Nanchen1,2   

  1. 1. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China;
    2. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2018-04-23 Revised:2018-06-26 Published:2019-09-15

摘要: 耕地利用效益与土地经营模式有密切关系。基于2006—2015年黑龙江省西部垦区与农区耕地利用有关数据,从经济、社会和生态效益入手构建耕地利用效益评价指标体系,采用熵值法测算耕地利用效益,运用耦合协调度模型划分耕地利用经济-社会-生态效益耦合协调度等级,比较垦区与农区耕地利用效益差异。结果如下。1)研究期间,垦区耕地利用效益缓慢增加,农区耕地利用效益波动下滑。垦区及农区耕地利用经济和社会效益均高于生态效益。2)2015年,垦区耕地利用的经济、社会和综合效益均高于农区,生态效益低于农区。垦区及农区耕地利用经济-社会-生态效益间均处于拮抗耦合阶段。垦区耕地利用效益间基本协调,农区轻度失调。3)土地经营模式不同是两类地区耕地利用效益差异的重要原因。在耕地利用过程中,应探索土地经营模式并重视经济、社会和生态效益的协调发展。

关键词: 耕地利用效益, 土地经营, 垦区, 农区

Abstract: The benefit of cultivated land use is closely connected with the land management models. Based on the data on the cultivated land use of the reclamation area and rural area in western Heilongjiang Province from 2006 to 2015, the evaluation index system of the cultivated land use was constructed to measure the economic-social-ecological benefits of cultivated land use by the entropy method. Based on the coupling coordination degree model, the coupling phases and coordination types were divided to make the comparative analysis on the benefit differences in cultivated land use between the reclamation areas and rural areas in western Heilongjiang Province. The results are given as follows. 1) The benefits of cultivated land use in the reclamation areas slowly increased from 2006 to 2015, while the benefits fluctuated and declined in the rural areas. The economic and social benefits were higher than the ecological benefits in both the reclamation areas and rural areas. 2) In 2015, the economic, social, and comprehensive benefits of cultivated land use in the reclamation areas were higher than in the rural areas, while the ecological benefits in the reclamation areas were lower than in the rural areas. The coupling degrees among the economic, social, and ecological benefits in both the reclamation and rural areas showed rivalries. The coordination degrees in the reclamation areas were relatively coordinate, while in the slight disorder in the rural areas. 3) Different land management models led to differences in the benefit of cultivated land use between these two types of areas. In the process of utilizing the cultivated land, it is suggested to explore land management models and to emphasize the coordinated development among the economic, social, and ecological benefits.

Key words: benefit of cultivated land use, land management, reclamation area, rural area

中图分类号: