欢迎访问中国科学院大学学报,今天是

中国科学院大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 240-251.DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2021.02.010

• 环境科学与地理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

水足迹视角下的农业生产空间布局——以天山北麓农产品主产区为例

陈洪星1,2, 李江月1,2, 杨德刚1, 李啸虎3, 蔡天毅1,2, 夏富强1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所 荒漠与绿洲生态国家重点实验室, 乌鲁木齐 830011;
    2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
    3. 新疆财经大学旅游学院, 乌鲁木齐 830012
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-29 修回日期:2019-09-19 发布日期:2021-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 杨德刚
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区自然基金青年项目(2013211B27)和中国科学院“西部之光”人才培养计划(RCPY201003)资助

Spatial distribution of agricultural production from perspective of water footprint: a case study of north-piedmont major agriculture production regions of Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang

CHEN Hongxing1,2, LI Jiangyue1,2, YANG Degang1, LI Xiaohu3, CAI Tianyi1,2, XIA Fuqiang1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. Tourism College, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, China
  • Received:2019-05-29 Revised:2019-09-19 Published:2021-03-15

摘要: 农业生产水足迹这一视角为研究区域农业空间资源要素匹配提供了新思路。以天山北麓农产品主产区15个县市为例,运用定量分析模型和GIS可视化技术,测算差异指数和不平衡指数,并进行水足迹与农业生产各要素的时空匹配分析。结果显示:2000—2017年区域内部水足迹指数不平衡且具有波动性,呈现出中部高、东西部偏低的空间格局。区域农业生产优势度整体上呈现出“中部高,东西低”的宏观态势,东中西地区分异趋于弱化,且2017年普遍下降。农业布局现状可分为过密型、合理型和过疏型3种类型。就水足迹指数与资源、环境、经济等各要素的匹配关系而言,发现沙湾县、乌苏市的水足迹-资源环境经济要素外部不公平性最为突出。具体而言:沙湾县和乌鲁木齐市水足迹-灌溉用水量不匹配问题较为突出;昌吉市、乌苏市、博乐市、克拉玛依市农产品水足迹与耕地资源匹配度较低;克拉玛依市区域水足迹-经济不平衡性较高;沙湾和奇台县农产品水足迹和农业面源污染的匹配状况较差;乌苏和奇台县水足迹-农业技术不平衡性较为显著。在此基础上,针对各县市水足迹与各要素之间的不平衡关系给出相应建议与对策。

关键词: 水足迹, 农业生产优势度, 差异指数, 不平衡指数, 天山北麓农产品主产区

Abstract: For the arid regions, it is necessary to implement a water-saving strategy. Water footprint strategy has been viewed as a vital countermeasure to solve the issues of grain and water security. In our research, first, the agricultural water footprint was calculated from 2000 to 2017, which presents the current actual level of agricultural development. Second, we established the regional agricultural production advantage model to explore the potential of agricultural development. Then we established the WF-APA (water footprint-agricultural production advantage) gap index to illustrate agricultural types of each county. Additionally, in order to more directly explore the matching relationship between water footprint and economy, technology, environment and resources, taking 2017 as an example, we computed the imbalance index of water footprint versus above mentioned factors. Specifically, agricultural irrigation water, cultivated land area, agricultural labor productivity, consumption of chemical fertilizers, and total power of cultivated land agricultural machinery were included. Results indicated that:1) The index of water footprint showed a large instability from 2000 to 2017, showing a spatial distribution that the total water footprint of middle counties is higher than those of eastern and western counties. 2) Regional agricultural production advantage can be divided into five types:high, relatively high, middle, low, relatively low, and general decrease in 2017. 3) Regional agricultural production can be divided into three types, which are reasonable, over-dense and over-sparse. 4) The outside fairness of the water footprint for agricultural products was found to be relatively low, suggesting that Shawan and Wusu counties were the most prominent areas. In any case, the findings of research would assist policy makers in formulating reasonable agricultural policies to guarantee food-water security and at the same time to answer for regional sustainability.

Key words: water footprint, agriculture production advantage, gap index, imbalanced index, north-piedmont major agriculture production regions of Tianshan mountains

中图分类号: