常见的恒星质量和恒星形成率计算方法之间的对比

doi:10.7523/j.ucas.2022.052

中国科学院大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 312-320.DOI: 10.7523/j.ucas.2022.052

• 数学与物理学 • 上一篇

常见的恒星质量和恒星形成率计算方法之间的对比

李翠环^1,2,3, 李国栋^3,4, 蔡肇伟^4,5, 单增罗布¹

1. 西藏大学理学院物理系, 拉萨 850000;
2. 西藏大学宇宙线教育部重点实验室, 拉萨 850000;
3. 中国科学院国家天文台, 北京 100101;
4. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
5. 中国科学院国家天文台中国科学院FAST重点实验室, 北京 100101

收稿日期:2022-03-07 修回日期:2022-05-06 发布日期:2022-05-12
通讯作者: 蔡肇伟,E-mail:cwtsai@nao.ac.cn;单增罗布,E-mail:dzlb@uTibet.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(12041302，11973051)资助

Comparisons among common methods of calculating stellar masses and star formation rates for normal galaxies

LI Cuihuan^1,2,3, LI Guodong^3,4, TSAI Chao-Wei^4,5, DANZENG Luobu¹

1. Department of physics, College of Science, Tibet University, Lhasa 850000, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Cosmic Rays of Ministry of Education, Tibet University, Lhasa 850000, China;
3. National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
5. CAS Key Laboratory of FAST, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2022-03-07 Revised:2022-05-06 Published:2022-05-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对斯隆数字巡天计划中有测光及光谱认证的正常星系的样本，利用天文多波段巡天数据，分别使用恒星质量和恒星形成率(SFR)的数种不同计算方法，从原理到结果进行相互对比。研究发现，不同的恒星质量估算方法的结果相互差异并不显著，然而SFR的不同方法之间存在不同程度且重要的误差。因此，在对星系间SFR进行相互比较，或是研究星系演化时的SFR分析时，应使用相类似的观测数据资料，以及同一种SFR估算方式，避免不同估算方式的偏差造成的错误解读。

关键词: 星系, 恒星质量, 恒星形成率, 星系演化

Abstract: Stellar mass and star formation rate are essential properties of galaxies. They are also an important basis for understanding the evolution of baryonic matter distribution on the cosmic time scale. Astronomers have developed many methods to estimate the stellar mass and star formation rate of a single galaxy using multi-waveband data. This paper evaluates the variations of the results from different stellar mass and star formation rate estimation methods using multi-wavelength sky survey data of a sample of normal galaxies from the Salon Digital Sky Survey. Our study shows that the results of various stellar mass estimation methods are not significantly different. However, the degree of deviation between the estimated star formation rates from different methods is significant and critical. Therefore, to avoid inaccurate interpretation caused by the discrepancy of different estimation methods, a similar observation data set and the same star formation rate estimation method should be used for each galaxy when comparing star formation rates between galaxies or analyzing star formation rates of a large galaxy sample.

Key words: galaxies, stellar mass, star formation rate, galaxy evolution

中图分类号:

P157.9

李翠环, 李国栋, 蔡肇伟, 单增罗布. 常见的恒星质量和恒星形成率计算方法之间的对比[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2024, 41(3): 312-320.

LI Cuihuan, LI Guodong, TSAI Chao-Wei, DANZENG Luobu. Comparisons among common methods of calculating stellar masses and star formation rates for normal galaxies[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2024, 41(3): 312-320.

参考文献

[1] Brinchmann J, Charlot S, White S D M, et al. The physical properties of star-forming galaxies in the low-redshift Universe[J]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2004, 351(4): 1151-1179. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07881.x.
[2] Bruzual G, Charlot S. Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003[J]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2003, 344(4):1000-1028. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x.
[3] Papovich C, Dickinson M, Ferguson H C. The stellar populations and evolution of lyman break galaxies[EB/OL]. 2001: arXiv: astro-ph/0105087. (2001-05-04)[2022-04-27]https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0105087.
[4] Kennicutt Jr R C, Evans II N J. Star formation in the milky way and nearby galaxies[J]. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2012, 50(1): 531-608. DOI:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610.
[5] Mancone C L, Gonzalez A H. EzGal: a flexible interface for stellar population synthesis models[J]. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2012, 124(916): 606-615. DOI:10.1086/666502.
[6] Boquien M, Burgarella D, Roehlly Y, et al. CIGALE: a python code investigating GALaxy emission[EB/OL].2019:arXiv:1811.03094.(2018-11-07)[2022-04-27]https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.03094.
[7] Yang G, Boquien M, Buat V, et al. X-cigale: fitting AGN/galaxy SEDs from X-ray to infrared[J]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2019, 491(1): 740-757. DOI:10.1093/mnras/stz3001.
[8] Alam S, Albareti F D, Prieto C A, et al. The eleventh and twelfth data releases of the Sloan digital sky survey: final data from sdss-iii[J]. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 2015, 219(1):12. DOI:10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/12.
[9] Bianchi L, Shiao B, Thilker D. Revised catalog of GALEX ultraviolet sources. I. The all-sky survey: GUVcat_AIS[EB/OL].2017:arXiv:1704.05903(2017-04-19) [2022-04-27]https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.05903.
[10] Chambers K C, Magnier E A, Metcalfe N, et al. The pan-STARRS1 surveys[EB/OL]. 2016: arXiv: 1612.05560[astro-ph.IM].(2016-12-16)[2022-04-27]https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05560.
[11] Lawrence A, Warren S J, Almaini O, et al. The UKIRT infrared deep sky survey (UKIDSS)[J]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2007,379(4):1599-1617.DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x.
[12] Marocco F, Eisenhardt P R M, Fowler J W, et al. The CatWISE2020 catalog[EB/OL]. 2020: arXiv:2012.13084(2020-12-24)[2022-04-27]https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.13084.
[13] Wright E L, Eisenhardt P R M, Mainzer A K, et al. The wide-field infrared survey explorer (wise): mission description and initial on-orbit performance[J]. The Astronomical Journal, 2010, 140(6):1868-1881.DOI:10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868.
[14] Kauffmann G, Heckman T M, White S D M, et al. Stellar masses and star formation histories for 10⁵ galaxies from the Sloan digital sky survey[J]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2003,341(1):33-53.DOI:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x.
[15] Bell E F, McIntosh D H, Katz N, et al. The optical and near-infrared properties of galaxies. I. Luminosity and stellar mass functions[J]. The Astrophysical Journal Letters Supplement Series, 2003, 149(2): 289-312. DOI:10.1086/378847.
[16] Yang G, Boquien M, Brandt W N, et al. Fitting AGN/galaxy X-ray-to-radio SEDs with CIGALE and improvement of the code[J]. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2022, 927(2): 192. DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4971.
[17] Maraston C. Evolutionary population synthesis: models, analysis of the ingredients and application to high-z galaxies[J]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2005, 362(3):799-825. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09270.x.
[18] Charlot S, Longhetti M. Nebular emission from star-forming galaxies[J]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2001, 323(4):887-903. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04260.x.
[19] Hao C N, Kennicutt R C, Johnson B D, et al. Dust-corrected star formation rates of galaxies. II. Combinations of ultraviolet and infrared tracers[J]. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2011, 741(2):124. DOI:10.1088/0004-637x/741/2/124.
[20] Murphy E J, Condon J J, Schinnerer E, et al. Calibrating extinction-free star formation rate diagnostics with 33 GHz free-free emission in NGC6946[J]. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2011, 737(2):67. DOI:10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/67.
[21] Fitzpatrick E L, Massa D. An analysis of the shapes of interstellar extinction curves. V. The IR-through-UV curve morphology[J]. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2007, 663(1): 320-341. DOI:10.1086/518158.
[22] Ciesla L, Elbaz D, Fensch J. The SFR-M_* main sequence archetypal star-formation history and analytical models[J]. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2017, 608: A41. DOI:10.1051/0004-6361/201731036.
[23] Kennicutt R C Jr. Star formation in galaxies along the Hubble sequence[J]. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1998, 36: 189-231. DOI:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189.
[24] Brown M J I, Moustakas J, Smith J D T, et al. An atlas of galaxy spectral energy distributions from the ultraviolet to the mid-infrared[J]. The Astrophysical Journal Letters Supplement Series, 2014, 212(2): 18. DOI:10.1088/0067-0049/212/2/18.

常见的恒星质量和恒星形成率计算方法之间的对比

Comparisons among common methods of calculating stellar masses and star formation rates for normal galaxies

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

访问统计

联系我们

[1]	沃佳怡, 蔡肇伟, 左沛, 陈天禄. 星暴矮星系NGC 5253周围的中性氢气体分布[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2024, 41(2): 188-194.
[2]	邓乐乐, 周方明, 赵璐璐, 梁广, 余金培. 基于奇异值分解的压缩感知GNSS信号捕获算法[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2023, 40(1): 128-134.
[3]	左文波, 杜翠花. 基于SCUSS和SDSS数据的银河系晕金属丰度分布[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2018, 35(4): 468-472.
[4]	杨小虎, 褚耀泉. 暗物质晕中星系的配置[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2008, 25(5): 712-720.