GEDI L2A不同算法对地面高程和森林冠层高度精度的影响分析

doi:10.7523/j.ucas.2021.0076

中国科学院大学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 502-511.DOI: 10.7523/j.ucas.2021.0076

• 电子信息与计算机科学 • 上一篇下一篇

GEDI L2A不同算法对地面高程和森林冠层高度精度的影响分析

刘丽娟¹, 王成^1,2, 聂胜², 朱笑笑², 习晓环², 王金亮¹

1. 云南师范大学地理学部云南省高校资源与环境遥感重点实验室云南省地理空间信息技术工程技术研究中心, 昆明 650500;
2. 中国科学院空天信息创新研究院中国科学院数字地球重点实验室, 北京 100094

收稿日期:2021-09-06 修回日期:2021-11-25 发布日期:2021-12-16
通讯作者: 王成
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(42071405)、中国科学院青年创新促进会(2019130)和国家重点研发计划政府间国际科技创新合作重点专项(2018YFE0184300)资助

Analysis of the influence of different algorithms of GEDI L2A on the accuracy of ground elevation and forest canopy height

LIU Lijuan¹, WANG Cheng^1,2, NIE Sheng², ZHU Xiaoxiao², XI Xiaohuan², WANG Jinliang¹

1. Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing for Universities in Yunnan, Center for Geospatial Information Engineering and Technology of Yunnan Province, Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China;
2. CAS Key Laboratory of Digital Earth, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China

Received:2021-09-06 Revised:2021-11-25 Published:2021-12-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 全球生态系统动力学调查(global ecosystem dynamics investigation,GEDI)雷达是美国2018年12月发射的全波形激光雷达系统,可以为全球地面高程及森林冠层高度提供数据支持。为适应不同地表环境,GEDI L2A产品提供了6种不同算法来估算地面高程及森林冠层高度,这些算法的选择会影响地表参数的提取精度。以机载LiDAR得到的数字地形模型和冠层高度模型为参考数据,评估第2版GEDI L2A数据在不同植被覆盖度下不同算法的适应性以及对地面高程和森林冠层高度精度的影响。结果表明,在覆盖度小于0.2时,算法4的结果最优,在覆盖度大于等于0.8时算法2的结果最优,其余覆盖度下算法1的结果最优。将本文根据植被覆盖度选择的最优算法与GEDI L2A默认最优算法进行比较,整体看来本文的结果优于GEDI L2A默认最优算法的结果,特别是在覆盖度小于0.8,坡度大于等于10°时,本文选择的最优算法能有效提高GEDI L2A产品对地面高程和森林冠层高度估算的精度。

关键词: GEDI, 全波形激光雷达, 地面高程, 森林冠层高度

Abstract: The global ecosystem dynamics investigation(GEDI) is a full-waveform LiDAR system launched by United States in December 2018, which can provide data support for global ground elevation and forest canopy height. In order to adapt to different surface environments, GEDI L2A products provide 6 different algorithms to estimate ground elevation and forest canopy height. The choice of these algorithms will affect the extraction accuracy of surface parameters. In this paper, the digital terrain model and canopy height model obtained by airborne laser scanning data are used as reference data to evaluate the adaptability of different algorithms of the second version of GEDI L2A data under different vegetation coverage values and the impact on the accuracy of ground elevation and forest canopy height. The results show that when the vegetation coverage is less than 0. 2, the result of algorithm 4 is the best, when the coverage is greater than or equal to 0. 8, the result of algorithm 2 is the best, and the result of algorithm 1 is the best under the remaining coverage values. Comparing the optimal algorithm selected in this paper according to the vegetation coverage with the GEDI L2A default optimal algorithm, the results of this paper are generally better than those of the GEDI L2A default optimal algorithm, especially when the coverage value is less than 0. 8 and the slope is greater than or equal to 10°. The optimal algorithm selected in this paper can effectively improve the accuracy of GEDI L2A products for estimating ground elevation and forest canopy height.

Key words: GEDI, full waveform LiDAR, ground elevation, forest canopy height

中图分类号:

P228.3

刘丽娟, 王成, 聂胜, 朱笑笑, 习晓环, 王金亮. GEDI L2A不同算法对地面高程和森林冠层高度精度的影响分析[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2022, 39(4): 502-511.

LIU Lijuan, WANG Cheng, NIE Sheng, ZHU Xiaoxiao, XI Xiaohuan, WANG Jinliang. Analysis of the influence of different algorithms of GEDI L2A on the accuracy of ground elevation and forest canopy height[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 39(4): 502-511.

参考文献

[1] Boucher P, Hancock S, Orwig D, et al. Detecting change in forest structure with simulated GEDI LiDAR waveforms:a case study of the hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA; adelges tsugae) infestation[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(8):1304. DOI:10.3390/rs12081304.
[2] Dubayah R, Blair J B, Goetz S, et al. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation:high-resolution laser ranging of the Earth's forests and topography[J]. Science of Remote Sensing, 2020, 1:100002. DOI:10.1016/j.srs.2020.100002.
[3] Schneider F D, Ferraz A, Hancock S, et al. Towards mapping the diversity of canopy structure from space with GEDI[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2020, 15(11):115006. DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/ab9e99.
[4] 谢栋平,李国元,赵严铭,等.美国GEDI天基激光测高系统及其应用[J].国际太空, 2018(12):39-44. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-2366.2018.12.008.
[5] Spracklen B, Spracklen D V. Determination of structural characteristics of old-growth forest in Ukraine using spaceborne LiDAR[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(7):1233. DOI:10.3390/rs13071233.
[6] Lin X J, Xu M, Cao C X, et al. Estimates of forest canopy height using a combination of ICESat-2/ATLAS data and stereo-photogrammetry[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(21):3649. DOI:10.3390/rs12213649.
[7] Fayad I, Baghdadi N, Bailly J S, et al. Analysis of GEDI elevation data accuracy for inland waterbodies altimetry[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(17), 2714. DOI:10.3390/rs12172714.
[8] Marselis S M, Abernethy K, Alonso A, et al. Evaluating the potential of full-waveform LiDAR for mapping pan-tropical tree species richness[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2020, 29(10):1799-1816. DOI:10.1111/geb.13158.
[9] Rishmawi K, Huang C Q, Zhan X W. Monitoring key forest structure attributes across the conterminous United States by integrating GEDI LiDAR measurements and VIIRS data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(3):442. DOI:10.3390/rs13030442.
[10] Adam M, Urbazaev M, Dubois C, et al. Accuracy assessment of GEDI terrain elevation and canopy height estimates in European temperate forests:influence of environmental and acquisition parameters[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(23):3948. DOI:10.3390/rs12233948.
[11] Beck J, Bradford W, Armston J, et al. GLOBAL ecosystem dynamics investigation (GEDI) level 2 user guide. South Dakota, USA:EROS Center, 2020.(2021-05-07). https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/documents/998/GEDI02_UserGuide_V21.pdf.
[12] Potapov P, Li X Y, Hernandez-Serna A, et al. Mapping global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2021, 253:112165. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2020.112165.
[13] Healey S P, Yang Z Q, Gorelick N, et al. Highly local model calibration with a new GEDI LiDAR asset on google earth engine reduces landsat forest height signal saturation[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(17):2840. DOI:10.3390/rs12172840.
[14] Guerra-Hernández J, Pascual A. Using GEDI LiDAR data and airborne laser scanning to assess height growth dynamics in fast-growing species:a showcase in Spain[J]. Forest Ecosystems, 2021, 8:14. DOI:10.1186/s40663-021-00291-2.
[15] Hofton M, Blair J B, Story S, et al. Algorithm theoretical basis document (ATBD) for GEDI transmit and receive waveform processing for L1 and L2 products. Goddard Space Flight Centre, 2019.(2019-12-04). https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/documents/581/GEDI_WF_ATBD_v1.0.pdf.
[16] White J C, Coops N C, Wulder M A, et al. Remote sensing technologies for enhancing forest inventories:a review[J]. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 2016, 42(5):619-641. DOI:10.1080/07038992.2016.1207484.
[17] Scholl V, Cattau M, Joseph M, et al. Integrating national ecological observatory network (NEON) airborne remote sensing and in-situ data for optimal tree species classification[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(9):1414. DOI:10.3390/rs12091414.
[18] Liu A B, Cheng X, Chen Z Q. Performance evaluation of GEDI and ICESat-2 laser altimeter data for terrain and canopy height retrievals[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2021, 264:112571. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2021.112571.
[19] Goulden T, Scholl V. NEON algorithm theoretical basis document (ATBD):ecosystem structure. NEON, 2019.(2019-07-01). https://data.neonscience.org/api/v0/documents/NEON.DOC.002387vA.

GEDI L2A不同算法对地面高程和森林冠层高度精度的影响分析

Analysis of the influence of different algorithms of GEDI L2A on the accuracy of ground elevation and forest canopy height

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

访问统计

联系我们