胡桃目的分化、进化和系统关系

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文所讨论的胡桃目的概念包括胡桃科和马尾树科。作者详细地对该类群植物性的分化，果实

传播方式及分化，生态及地理的分化等方面进行了较系统的分析，最后探讨了该目的系统位置，认为胡桃目与杨梅目和山毛榉目有密切的联系，是金缕梅类植物演化最高级的一个类群。

关键词: 胡桃目, 胡桃科, 马尾树科, 分化, 进化, 系统关系

Abstract:

The present paper discusses the differentiation, evolution and systematic rela-

tionship of the order Juglandales, which contains Juglandaceae and Rhoipteleaceae.

1. The differentiation of sex

At the early stage of differentiation of Juglandales, the sexual differentiation played a

great role and its trend is: bisexual flowers→polygamous flowers→inflorescences androgynous→

inflorescences unisexual. As a result, flowers in the more advanced taxa are more reduced, i.e.

their perianthes gradually reduced, or even disappeared, while their stigmas become more speci-

alized. This fact indicates that Juglandales is one of the most advanced wind-pollinated taxa.

2. The dispersal and differentiation of fruits

The fruit of Juglandales is spread by the wind or animals. The fruits for animal dispersal

are of the edible parts for animals. They evolved along the two pathways: (1) the wings develo-

ped from trilobed bracts (fused from 1 bract and 2 bracteoles), such as those of Engelhardia

and Oreomunnea, evolved towards reduction, and as a result, their fruits have enlarged into

wingless drupe-nuts (as in Alfaroa). (2) the fruits with two wings (as in Pterocarya)→the fruits

with ring wings (as in Cyclocarya)→typical drupe-nuts (as in Juglans, Carya, Annamocarya).

Therefore, we suggest that the fruits of Juglandales have evolved from wind-dispersed to anim-

al-dispersed.

3. The differentiation of the habit

The types of winter buds indicate the states of habit in differentiation and evolution in Ju-

glandales. In the author's opinion, Juglandaceae is of forest origin in tropical mountains with

seasonal drought. Their primitive groups usually have naked buds (as in Rhoipteleaceae, Engel-

hardia, Oreomunnea, Alfaroa), while their more advanced groups have buds enclosed by scales,

adapted to temperate and relatively dry circumstances and expanding their distributional areas.

In the primitive section Sinocarya of Carya, plants have naked buds, however in the living plants

of section Carya and section Apocarya, which are distributed in North America, all have bud

scales. This evidence shows that the differentiation of habit in Juglandales is from the one ada-

pted to rather moist tropical and subtropical circumstances to the one adapted to rather dry te-

mperate ones.

4. The geographical differentiation

One of the present authors (Lu, 1982) has made a detailed study on the geographical dist-

ribution of Juglandaceae and considers that the forest in tropical mountains with seasonal dro-

ught of central and South-western China and Northern Indo-China may be the birthplace of Ju-

glandaceae. The family Rhoipteleaceae is distributed in Western Guizhou and Guangxi, East-

southern Yunnan and Northern Viet-nam, where the primitive section Psilocarpeae of Engelha-

rdia are also distributed. Therefore it is considered that the above-mentioned speculation is also

applicable to Juglandales. The authors are of the opinion that Juglandaceae and Rhoipteleaceae

may have a common ancestor, or at least, they might have together originated from the preju-

glandales in the Late Cretaceous. Now this opinion still has been debated. Manchester (1987)

holds that “Asia…has served as a refugium rather than as a cradle for juglandaceous taxa...,

An Asian origin also seems unlikely because Asia lies outside of the Normapolles province from

which the family probably evolved. The earliest centre of juglandaceous generic diversity ap-

pears to have been North America.” According to this view, however, it is difficult to explain:

(1) The fossil genera discovered in North America, especially the fossils of Engelhardia compl-

ex, are more advanced than the living Engelhardia distributed in Eastern Asia; (2) Juglanda-

ceae and Rhoipteleaceae might have originated from a common ancestor, and the fossil records

of Rhoipteleaceae have so far not been discovered in North America. These two facts seem to in-

dicate that Juglandaceae have originated from Asia rather than from North America. Unfortu-

nately the fossil records of Juglandales in Asia are inadequate for solving the problem.

5. The systematic relationship of Juglandales

There are three different points of view in the four published systems of anigosperms in

1980's, i.e. (1) Including Juglandales in subclass Hamamelidae (Takhtajan, 1980; 1987; Cronqu-

ist, 1981); (2) Considering Juglandales and the most other orders (except Urticales) of Hama-

melidae as the members of Rosiiflorae (Dahlgren, 1983); (3) Grouping Juglandaceae and Rh-

oipteleaceae into the suborder Juglandineae, which is placed in the order Rutales and considered

closely related to Anacardiaceae (Thorne, 1983), The present authors, on the basis of the data

from modern and fossil palynology, wood anatomy and serology etc., consider that Juglandales

is closely related to Myricales and Fagales, rather than to Anacardiaceae, and is one of the most

advanced taxa in Hamamelidae.

Key words: Juglandales, Juglandaceae, Rhoipteleaceae, Differentiation, Evolution, Systematic relationship

路安民, 张志耘. 胡桃目的分化、进化和系统关系[J]. 中国科学院大学学报.

Lu An-Ming, Zhang Zhi-Yun. The Differentiation, Evolution and Systematic Relationship of Juglandales[J]. .

[1]	徐丽凡, 王雄. 一种基于差分算法的共形聚焦式微波热疗系统[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2020, 37(5): 708-713.
[2]	桑睿, 吴杰, 许华, 郭强. 基于改进的遗传算法的后非线性盲源分离[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2012, 29(5): 707-713.
[3]	郑家强, 杨建虹. 细胞外钙离子对人成骨样细胞 MG-63分化的影响[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2011, 28(1): 57-64.
[4]	刘爱华, 王建波, 朱英国. 芸薹属多倍体植物基因组进化的RAPD分析[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2003, 41(6): 520-530.
[5]	季祥彪, 叶能干. 双子叶植物幼苗类型及其可能的演化关系[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2003, 41(5): 447-464.
[6]	杨亲二. 国产12种乌头属和18种翠雀属植物的细胞学研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2001, 39(6): 502-514.
[7]	何兴金,许介眉. 中国葱属单生组4种植物的核型研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2001, 39(5): 423-432.
[8]	杨继. 植物多倍体基因组的形成与进化[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2001, 39(4): 357-372.
[9]	王超,王建波,施苏华,钟扬. 山羊草属异源多倍体物种核rDNA ITS区的进化[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2000, 38(3): 211-217.
[10]	王建波,张文驹,陈家宽. 核rDNA的ITS序列在被子植物系统与进化研究中的应用[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1999, 37(4): 407-416.
[11]	朱世梅,许介眉. 葱属薤白的核型分化[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1999, 37(3): 269-278.
[12]	景望春,许介眉,杨蕾. 葱属宽叶组植物细胞分类学研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1999, 37(1): 20-34.
[13]	葛颂,洪德元. 泡沙参复合体(桔梗科)的物种生物学研究 Ⅳ. 等位酶水平的变异和分化[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1998, 36(6): 481-489.
[14]	李秀兰,宋文芹,安祝平,陈瑞阳. 木兰科属间核型比较[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1998, 36(3): 232-237.
[15]	王印政, 顾志建, 洪德元. 异叶苣苔属(苦苣苔科)的核型研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 1998, 36(1): 28-35.

胡桃目的分化、进化和系统关系

The Differentiation, Evolution and Systematic Relationship of Juglandales

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

访问统计

联系我们