Changes and coupling characteristics of industrial production space and industrial structure during the economic transformation period in Pearl River Delta

doi:10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2017.05.007

Abstract

Abstract: By using the integrated variation coefficients of industrial production space and the industrial structure adjustment index,we analyzed the changes in industrial production space and industrial structure during the transformation period in Pearl River Delta (PRD) and evaluated their coupling coordination degree by using the coupling model.The main results obtained in this study are given as follows.1) The industrial production space has an expanding trend from core area to periphery in PRD,and the change degree in periphery is larger than in core area.2) The industrial structure of PRD has been constantly optimized during the transformation period,but cities which are in different stages of industrialization development have different adjustment directions.The cities at higher industrialization level tend to evolve toward higher industrial structures and pay much attention to the development quality and environmental protection.However,the cities at lower industrialization level mainly develop the resource-based industry and high pollution industry.3) The coupling coordination degree between industrial production space change and industrial structure adjustment in periphery of PRD is higher than in core area,but the coupling coordination level and development quality in the periphery of PRD are very low.During the economic transformation period,we should not only show concern for the increase of the "quantity",but also pay more attention to the promotion of the "quality" of the industrial production space and industrial structure.

Key words: industrial production space, industrial structure, coupling degree, Pearl River Delta

CLC Number:

K902

DING Jun, WANG Kaiyong. Changes and coupling characteristics of industrial production space and industrial structure during the economic transformation period in Pearl River Delta[J]. , 2017, 34(5): 573-581.

References

[1] 李燕, 贺灿飞. 1998-2009年珠江三角洲制造业空间转移特征及其机制[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(5):777-787.
[2] Sit V F S. Hong Kong's "transferred" industrialization and industrial geography[J]. Asian Survey, 1998, 38(9):880-904.
[3] Smart A, Hsu J Y. The Chinese diaspora, foreign investment and economic development in China[J]. The Review of International Affairs, 2004, 3(4):544-566.
[4] Yang C. Overseas Chinese investments in transition:the case of Dongguan[J]. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2006, 47(5):604-621.
[5] 许学强, 李郇. 改革开放30年珠江三角洲城镇化的回顾与展望[J]. 经济地理, 2009, 29(1):13-18.
[6] 闫小培, 林耿, 普军, 等. 大珠江三角洲的产业升级与国际竞争力[J]. 经济地理, 2007, 27(6):972-976.
[7] 叶玉瑶, 李小彬, 张虹鸥. 珠江三角洲建设用地开发利用极限研究[J]. 资源科学, 2008, 30(5):683-687.
[8] 王树功, 周永章. 大城市群(圈)资源环境一体化与区域可持续发展研究:以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J]. 中国人口.资源与环境, 2002, 12(3):54-59.
[9] 叶玉瑶, 张虹鸥, 吴旗韬, 等. 珠江三角洲村镇产业用地整合的策略、模式与案例分析[J]. 人文地理, 2014, 136(2):96-100,75.
[10] 马丽, 金凤君, 刘毅. 中国经济与环境污染耦合度格局及工业结构解析[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(10):1299-1307.
[11] 张明斗, 莫冬燕. 城市土地利用效益与城市化的耦合协调性分析:以东北三省34个地级市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(1):8-16.
[12] 刘耀彬, 李仁东, 宋学锋. 中国区域城市化与生态环境耦合的关联分析[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(2):237-247.
[13] 周艳, 黄贤金, 徐国良, 等. 长三角城市土地扩张与人口增长耦合态势及其驱动机制[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(2):313-324.
[14] 张文忠, 王传胜, 吕昕, 等. 珠江三角洲土地利用变化与工业化和城市化的耦合关系[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(5):677-685.
[15] 郭付友, 陈才, 刘继生. 1990年以来长春市工业空间扩展的驱动力分析[J]. 人文地理, 2014, 129(6):88-94.
[16] 申庆喜, 李诚固, 周国磊. 基于工业空间视角的长春市1995~2011年城市功能空间耦合特征与机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(7):882-889.
[17] 夏丽丽, 闫小培. 2009. 基于重化工业发展的珠江三角洲工业空间结构演变研究[J]. 人文地理, 24(6):68-72.
[18] Drucker J, Feser E. Regional industrial structure and agglomeration economies:an analysis of productivity in three manufacturing industries[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2012, 42(1/2):1-14.
[19] Fan C C, Scott A J. Industrial agglomeration and development:a survey of spatial economic issues in East Asia and statistical analysis of Chinese regions[J]. Economic Geography, 2003, 79(3):295-319.
[20] Lydia G. Industrial structure and innovation evidence from European regions[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2004, 14(5):563-592.
[21] Gian P Z. Shift-share analysis with spatial structure:an application to Italian industrial districts[J]. Transition Studies Review, 2006, 13(1):213-227.
[22] Chen H X, Li G P. Empirical study on effect of industrial structure change on regional economic growth of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Region[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(6):708-714.
[23] 樊杰, 陈东. 珠江三角洲产业结构转型与空间结构调整的战略思考[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2009, 24(2):138-144.
[24] 顾湘, 姜海, 王铁成, 等. 工业用地集约利用评价与产业结构调整:以江苏省为例[J]. 资源科学, 2009, 31(4):612-618.
[25] 李诚固, 郑文升, 王晓芳. 我国城市化与产业结构演变的互动变化趋势研究[J]. 人文地理, 2004, 19(4):50-54.
[26] 郑文升, 蒋华雄, 曾菊新, 等. 城市工业的结构调整与空间分布变化耦合度评价:以武汉市为例[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2015, 34(2):69-74.
[27] 丁俊, 王开泳. 珠江三角洲城市群工业生产空间格局、形态特征及影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(5):610-621.
[28] 刘盛和, 吴传钧, 沈洪泉. 基于GIS的北京城市土地利用扩展模式[J]. 地理学报, 2000, 55(4):407-416.
[29] 肖捷颖, 葛京凤, 沈彦俊, 等. 基于GIS的石家庄市城市土地利用扩展分析[J]. 地理研究, 2003, 22(6):789-798.
[30] 张婧, 李诚固, 周国磊, 等. 长春市公共服务设施用地演变格局与机制[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(12):1939-1952.
[31] 王云璇, 马跃东, 阎小培. 东莞工业行业特征分析及展望[J]. 热带地理, 2002, 22(3):199-203.
[32] Guan W, Xu S T. Spatial energy efficiency patterns and the coupling relationship with industrial structure:a study on Liaoning Province, China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2015, 25(3):355-368.
[33] 刘浩, 张毅, 郑文升. 城市土地集约利用与区域城市化的时空耦合协调发展评价:以环渤海地区城市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(10):1805-1817.
[34] 王菲, 董锁成, 毛琦梁. 中国工业结构演变及其环境效应时空分异[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(10):1793-1806.