Optimization of pretreatment parameters of produced water in coal series gas field with high salt, high hardness, and high turbidity

doi:10.7523/j.ucas.2021.0070

Abstract

Abstract: The produced water of coal-measure gas field in Linxing block, eastern margin of Ordos basin was characterized by high salt content, high hardness, and high turbidity. After experiment and engineering demonstration, the scheme of "pretreatment-reverse osmosis-MVR" was proposed to make the treated water meet standards for irrigation water quality. The pretreatment process of "hardness removal-flocculation-filtration-ultrafiltration" was simulated to explore the optimal process conditions for hardness and turbidity removal. The results showed that the hardness removal effect of Na₂CO₃ was better than that of NaOH. When the dosage of Na₂CO₃ was 15000mg·L^-1, the maximum hardness removal rate was 99.39%. The mathematical model established by response surface methodology with turbidity removal rate as response value was very significant (P<0.0001). The optimal process conditions were pH 8.85, PAC dosage 148.34mg·L^-1, PAM dosage 6.51mg·L^-1. Under these conditions, the predicted turbidity removal rate was 83.32%, the actual turbidity removal rate was 82.77%, indicating a high degree of fitting between the actual and predicted values. The optimization of pretreatment process parameters is conducive to the fine control of the project, so as to reduce the cost and provide a guarantee for the subsequent reverse osmosis desalination treatment.

Key words: coal-measure gas, produced water, pretreatment, response surface methodology, parameter optimization

CLC Number:

X741

WANG Jingwei, LIU Yanping, JU Yiwen, JU Liting, LIU Xinchun. Optimization of pretreatment parameters of produced water in coal series gas field with high salt, high hardness, and high turbidity[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 39(1): 74-82.

References

[1] 曹代勇, 姚征, 李靖. 煤系非常规天然气评价研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2014, 42(1):89-92, 105.
[2] 赵群, 杨慎, 钱伟, 等. 中国非常规天然气开发现状及前景思考[J]. 环境影响评价, 2020, 42(5):34-37.
[3] 郭红光, 余志晟, 魏敏, 等. 生物成因煤层气形成的微生物分子生态学研究进展[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2015, 32(1):1-8.
[4] 温彩哨, 余志晟, 刘新春, 等. 煤层气产出水水质特征及处理技术研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2014, 34(10):1-6.
[5] Zhang S H, Tang S H, Li Z C, et al. Study of hydrochemical characteristics of CBM co-produced water of the Shizhuangnan block in the southern Qinshui basin, China, on its implication of CBM development[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2016, 159:169-182.
[6] 冯华伟, 李佳. 煤层气开采产出水特征及处理措施[J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(4):31-35.
[7] 孙少川, 彭芳芳, 任彬, 等. 沁南地区煤层气开发产出水对环境的影响分析[J]. 能源与环保, 2017, 39(8):96-100, 104.
[8] Rebello C A, Couperthwaite S J, Millar G J, et al. Under-standing coal seam gas associated water, regulations and strate-gies for treatment[J]. Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, 2016, 13:32-43.
[9] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 农田灌溉水质标准:GB 5084-2005[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2006.
[10] Poznyak T, Bautista G L, Chaírez I, et al. Decomposition of toxic pollutants in landfill leachate by ozone after coagulation treatment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 152(3):1108-1114.
[11] 松丽涛. 臭氧氧化技术在工业废水处理中的应用[J]. 化工管理, 2020(30):104-105.
[12] Li M, Zou D L, Zou H C, et al. Degradation of nitrobenzene in simulated wastewater by iron-carbon micro-electrolysis packing[J]. Environmental Technology, 2011, 32(15):1761-1766.
[13] 扶咏梅, 刘盼, 郭一飞, 等. 超滤膜处理传统二级出水试验研究[J]. 河南城建学院学报, 2019, 28(3):76-80.
[14] Kameda T, Yoshioka T, Mitsuhashi T, et al. The simul-taneous removal of calcium and chloride ions from calcium chloride solution using magnesium-aluminum oxide[J]. Water Research, 2003, 37(16):4045-4050.
[15] 胡瑞柱, 黄廷林, 杨尚业. 石灰法与氢氧化钠法去除地下水源硬度试验对比研究[J]. 给水排水, 2016, 52(7):29-35.
[16] 铁中用. 地下水硬度去除技术研究[D]. 济南:山东建筑大学, 2013.
[17] 蒋小友, 于望, 吴军, 等. 一种高盐废水去除硬度的方法及最佳工艺参数探讨[J]. 绿色科技, 2017(24):49-51, 55.
[18] Gao S S, Du M A, Tian J Y, et al. Effects of chloride ions on electro-coagulation-flotation process with aluminum electrodes for algae removal[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 182(1-3):827-834.
[19] 叶陶灵, 吴淑琰, 韩立扬, 等. 电絮凝技术在水处理中的应用和发展[J]. 山东化工, 2019, 48(16):92-95.
[20] 张峰振, 杨波, 张鸿, 等. 电絮凝法进行废水处理的研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2012, 32(12):11-16.
[21] Holt P K, Barton G W, Mitchell C A. The future for electrocoagulation as a localised water treatment technology[J]. Chemosphere, 2005, 59(3):355-367.
[22] 秦兰兰, 蒲生彦, 门杰, 等. 混凝-芬顿氧化协同处理采油废水的研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2015, 54(11):2615-2619.
[23] 国家环境保护总局《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 4版. 北京:中国环境出版社, 2002.
[24] 国家环境保护总局. 污水综合排放标准:GB 8978-1996[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 1998.
[25] 薛纯琦, 吴建光, 钟建华, 等. 海陆交互相与陆相页岩储层差异性特征:以鄂尔多斯盆地东北部临兴-神府工区山西组为例[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 51(4):998-1011.
[26] 王飞腾. 中国典型地区二叠系页岩气赋存机理与富集模式[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2020.
[27] 陈学立, 李久庆, 张海锋, 等. 岩浆热变质作用对临兴区块煤层气含量赋存影响[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2017, 29(5):27-33.
[28] 周宝艳, 傅雪海, 秦勇, 等. 河东煤田水文地质条件与煤层气的关系[C]//中国煤炭学会. 煤层气勘探开发理论与实践. 2007:80-87.
[29] 师晶, 黄文辉, 吕晨航, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区上古生界泥岩地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(8):876-889.
[30] 吴蒙. 临兴-神府地区煤系致密砂岩润湿性[D]. 江苏徐州:中国矿业大学, 2019.
[31] 刘东, 武春瑞, 吕晓龙. 反渗透浓水除硬方法及其对减压膜蒸馏过程的影响[J]. 工业水处理, 2010, 30(5):23-26.
[32] 王永菲, 王成国. 响应面法的理论与应用[J]. 中央民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 14(3):236-240.
[33] 连国奇, 仝双梅. 复合絮凝法预处理高浓度煤化工废水影响因素研究[J]. 现代化工, 2017, 37(9):139-142.
[34] 李文龙. 加载絮凝-超滤-反渗透处理电镀废水中试研究[D]. 北京:北京化工大学, 2018.
[35] 胡佳欣, 汤洁, 谢添, 等. 混凝-芬顿联合预处理煤化工废水分析[J]. 河南科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 36(6):96-99, 10.
[36] 朱丽榕, 柯水洲, 朱佳, 等. 传统与加载絮凝工艺处理铜镍废水的污泥特性对比研究[J]. 环境工程, 2018, 36(4):142-147.