Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences >
Study on the ultrastructures of the attachment apparatus of 51 insect species
Received date: 2014-02-25
Revised date: 2014-06-17
Online published: 2015-03-15
The ultrastructures of the attachment apparatus of 51 insect species from 7 orders were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Three types of adhesive structure, the smooth structure, the hairy structure, and the sucker, were found and are described in this paper. Based on the morphology and the distribution of the adhesive structures, the smooth adhesive structures can be subdivided into three types: the smooth arolium, the smooth pulvilli, and the smooth euplantulae; the hairy adhesive structures can be subdivided into four types: the hairy adhesive soles, the hairy pulvilli, the fossula spongiosa, and the adhesive structure transformed from the tarsal thorns; and the sucker is a specific adhesive structure found in the species of Dytiscidae. This study shows that the structures of the attachment apparatus are very diverse in insects and are very distinct at the order level. These facts can be used for taxonomic identifications and phylogenetic studies.
Key words： adhesion; ultrastructure; smooth; hairy
LIU Zheng , ZHAO Yaling , LIANG Aiping . Study on the ultrastructures of the attachment apparatus of 51 insect species[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015 , 32(2) : 172 -184 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2015.02.005
[1] Vogel M J, Steen P H. Capillarity-based switchable adhesion [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2010, 107(8): 3 377-3 381.
[2] Stork N E. A scanning electron microscope study of tarsal adhesive setae in the Coleoptera [J]. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1980, 68:173-306.
[3] Hanna G, Barnes W J P. Adhesion and detachment of the toe pads of tree frogs [J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1991, 155: 103-125.
[4] Walker G. Adhesion to smooth surfaces by insects: a review [J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 1993, 13 (1):3-7.
[5] Autumn K, Liang Y A, Hsieh S T, et al. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair [J]. Nature, 2000, 405:681-685.
[6] Beutel R G, Gorb S N. Ultrastructure of attachment specializations of hexapods (Arthropoda): evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny [J]. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 2001, 39:177-207.
[7] Bullock J M R, Federle W. Beetle adhesive hairs differ in stiffness and stickiness: in vivo adhesion measurements on individual setae [J]. Naturwissenschaften, 2011, 98 (5):381-387.
[8] Liu Z, Liang A P. Ultrastructure of the tarsus in Oides decempunctatus (Billberg) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) [J]. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 2013, 86(2):122-132.
[9] 张学书, 梁爱萍. 三种蝇类昆虫(双翅目)足爪垫结构的超微形态研究 [J]. 动物分类学报. 2012, 37 (4): 694-700.
[10] Weirauch C. Hairy attachment structures in Reduviidae (Cimicomorpha, Heteroptera), with observations on the fossula spongiosa in some other Cimicomorpha [J]. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 2007, 246:155-175.
[11] Edwards J S. Observations on the development and predatory habit of two reduviid Heteroptera, Rhinocoris carmelita Stal and Platymeris rhadamanthus Gerst [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London A, 1962, 37: 89-98.
[12] Gorb S, Scherge M. Biological microtribology: anisotropy in frictional forces of orthopteran attachment pads reflects the ultrastructure of a highly deformable material [J]. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London Series B, 2000, 267 (1449):1 239-1 244.
[13] Gorb S, Jiao Y, Scherge M. Ultrastructural architecture and mechanical properties of attachment pads in Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera Tettigoniidae) [J]. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2000, 186 (9):821-831.
[14] Bullock J M R, Federle W. The effect of surface roughness on claw and adhesive hair performance in the dock beetle Gastrophysa viridula [J]. Insect Science, 2011, 18:298-304.
[15] Federle W. Why are so many adhesive pads hairy?[J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2006, 209 (14):2611-2621.
[16] Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang Y A, et al. Evidence for van der waals adhesion in gecko setae [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2002, 99:12 252-12 256.
[17] Autumn K, Dittmore A, Santos D, et al. Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment [J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2006, 209:3 569-3 579.
[18] Geiselhardt S F, Lamm S, Gack C, et al. Interaction of liquid epicuticular hydrocarbons and tarsal adhesive secretion in Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) [J]. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2010, 196:369-378.
[19] Betz O. Structure of the tarsi in some Stenus species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae): external morphology, ultrastructure, and tarsal secretion [J]. Journal of Morphology, 2003, 255 (1):24-43.
[20] Nelson D R, Adams T S, Fatland C L. Hydrocarbons in the surface wax of eggs and adults of the colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata [J]. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B, 2003, 134:447-466.
[21] Federle W, Riehle M, Curtis A S G, et al. An integrative study of insect adhesion: mechanics and wet adhesion of pretarsal pads in ants [J]. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 2002, 42:1 100-1 106.
[22] Dirks J H, Clemente C J, Federle W. Insect tricks: two-phasic foot pad secretion prevents slipping [J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2010, 7:587-593.
[23] Langer M G, Ruppersberg J P, Gorb S. Adhesion forces measured at the level of a terminal plate of the fly's seta [J]. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London Series B, 2004, 271(1554):2 209-2 215.
[24] Arzt E, Gorb S, Spolenak R. From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2003, 100 (29):10 603-10 606.
[25] 陈少华, 苏爱嘉. 生物黏附与仿生黏附力学的进展 [J]. 力学与实践,2007, 29 (2): 9-17.
[26] 戴振东, 孙久荣. 壁虎的运动及仿生研究进展 [J]. 自然科学进展,2006, 16 (5): 519-523.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |