Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences >
Analysis on manufacturing industry shift in Pan-Yangtze River Delta based on “core-periphery” theory
Received date: 2014-04-11
Revised date: 2014-07-15
Online published: 2015-05-15
As the forefront of China's reform and opening up, the Pan-Yangtze River Delta has become one of the most developed areas in China. Recently, it experienced manufacturing relocation due to severe shortage of resources as well as other relevant factors. Hence, issues of manufacturing industry shift in the Pan-Yangtze River Delta have increasingly become academic focus. Based on the perspective of "core-periphery" theory, the Pan-Yangtze River Delta is divided into three regions, "core-marginal-peripheral". Based on the output data of 28 industry departments in the Pan-Yangtze River from 2000 to 2012, we systematically show and decompose the increase of industry at city level in the regions and explain the increase by the regional effect, the structural effect, and the competitive effect. Then the process of industry shift between different regions is studied based on the shift-share analysis diagrams. Finally we explore the mechanism of industry shift using the "push-pull" model.
Key words： Pan-Yangtze River Delta; core-periphery; industry shift; shift-share model
ZHAO Jinli , ZHANG Luocheng . Analysis on manufacturing industry shift in Pan-Yangtze River Delta based on “core-periphery” theory[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015 , 32(3) : 317 -324 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2015.03.005
[1] 文枚.中国工业在区域上的重新定位和聚集[J].经济研究,2004(2):84-94.
[2] Prebisch R. Commercial policy in the underdeveloped countries [J].American Economic Review, 1959, 49:251-273.
[3] Akamatus Kaname. A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries[R]. The Developing Economies. Preliminary. NO. 1.1962.
[4] Vernon R. International investment and international trade in the product cycle[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1996(5): 190-207.
[5] Kojima K. Direct foreign investment:a Japanese model of multinational business operations[M]. New York:Praeger, 1978.
[6] 巴克利,卡森.跨国公司的未来[M].冯亚华,池娟,译. 北京:中国金融出版社,2005.
[7] Dunning J H. The Paradigm of International Production [J].Journal of International Business Studies, 1988:9-18.
[8] 陈建军.中国现阶段产业区域转移的实证研究: 结合浙江105 家企业的问卷调查报告的分析[J].管理世界, 2002 (6): 64-74.
[9] 贺灿飞,朱彦刚.中国资源密集型产业地理分布研究: 以石油加工业和黑色金属产业为例[J].自然资源学报, 2010, 25 (3): 488-501.
[10] 魏后凯.产业转移的发展趋势及其对竞争力的影响[J].福建论坛:社会经济版,2003(4): 11-15.
[11] 陈建军.产业区域转移与东扩西进战略: 理论和实证分析[M].北京:中华书局,2002.
[12] 陶诚,耿光颖,王春贤.安徽省承接东部沿海产业转移效应分析及相关建议[J].金融纵横,2009 (1): 30-33.
[13] 于涛方,甄峰,吴泓.长江经济带区域结构:"核心-边缘"视角[J].城市规划学刊, 2007(3): 41-48.
[14] 刘兆德,姚春丽,虞孝感. 20世纪90年代以来长江三角洲地区空间极化研究[J].地理与地理信息科学, 2007, 23 (6): 82-86.
[15] 陈建军,姚先国.论上海和浙江的区域经济关系:一个关于"中心-边缘"理论和"极化-扩散"效应的实证研究[J].中国工业经济研究, 2003(5): 28-33.
[16] 陈建军.长江三角洲地区产业结构与空间结构的演变[J].浙江大学学报:人文社会科学版,2007,37(2):89-93.
[17] 陈晓,陈雯,张蕾,等.基于区际联系的"泛长三角"范围判定[J].地理科学进展, 2010, 29(3): 370-376.
[18] Knudsen D. Shift-share analysis: further examination of models for the description of economic change[J]. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 2000, 34: 177-198.
[19] 李燕,贺灿飞.1998—2009 年珠江三角洲制造业空间转移特征及其机制[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(5):778-784.
[20] 赵瑜嘉,贺灿飞,王伟凯.基于偏移-份额模型的中国制造业空间格局变化解释[J].地理与地理信息科学, 2013, 29(3): 76-81.
[21] 贺灿飞, 朱晟君. 制造业地理集聚的区域差异研究:江苏和安徽对比研究[J].地理科学,2008,28(6):715-720.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |