Welcome to Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Today is

Dynamic assessment of environmental risk for Yangtze River basin using objective weighting method

  • YANG Xiaolin ,
  • LI Yiling
Expand
  • 1. Safety and Emergency Management Research Center, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, Henan, China;
    2. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Science, Chengdu 610041, China

Received date: 2014-06-04

  Revised date: 2014-10-23

  Online published: 2015-05-15

Abstract

An assessment index system is built and it is composed of the hazards of risk source and the sensitivity and resiliency of risk receptors. The dynamic assessment of environmental risk in the Yangtze River basin from 2000 to 2011 was evaluated by using the "vertical-and-horizontal scatter degree" method and the "time ordered weighted averaging operator" method. The results are given in the following. 1)Temporally, the environmental risk of the study area decreased slightly in the initial stage of the study period, followed by an obvious increase consequently. 2)Spatially, great variations in risk value indicate that the Yangtze River basin can be divided into the high, relatively high, medium, and low risk regions with assistance of cluster analysis. The high risk zone includes Shanghai, Jiangsu, and Henan; the relatively high risk zone includes Anhui, Hunan, Hubei, and Zhejiang; the provinces in the central area of the Yangtze River basin, such as Sichuan, Guangxi, Chongqing, Yunnan, and so on, are in the medium risk zone; and the Tibet and Qinghai occupy the low risk zone. The temporal and spatial patterns of environmental risk for the Yangtze River basin provides important scientific basis for the environmental risk management.

Cite this article

YANG Xiaolin , LI Yiling . Dynamic assessment of environmental risk for Yangtze River basin using objective weighting method[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015 , 32(3) : 349 -355 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2015.03.009

References

[1] 谢元博,李巍,郝芳华.基于区域环境风险评价的产业布局规划优化研究[J].中国环境科学,2013,33(3):560-568.

[2] 卢静,孙宁,夏建新,等.中国环境风险现状和发展趋势分析[J].环境科学与管理,2012,37(1):10-16.

[3] 陈郁,杨凤林,宋国宝,等.化工企业突发大气环境风险评价标准的探讨[J].环境科学学报,2012,32(9):2 310-2 318.

[4] 邢辉,周尊山,吕安勤,等.基于模糊综合评判方法的沉船风险预警[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(4):115-120.

[5] 巩杰,赵彩霞,王合领,等.基于地质灾害的陇南山区生态风险评价:以陇南市武都区为例[J].山地学报,2012,30(5):570-577.

[6] 曾小红,毕海普,司鹄.化工园区泄漏事故安全风险评估模式研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(2):165-170.

[7] Xu L Y, Liu G Y. The study of a method of regional environmental risk assessment [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90:3 290-3 296.

[8] 曲常胜,毕军,黄蕾,等.我国区域环境风险动态综合评价研究[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2010,46(3):477-482.

[9] 董军,国方媛.多层次系统的动态评价研究[J].运筹与管理,2011,20(5):176-184.

[10] 王银彩,马智利.长江流域各地区环境保护水平分析[J].云南地理环境研究,2006,18(1):87-92.

[11] 高丽娜,张仁健,韩志伟,等.2011年冬季长江三角洲气态污染物的模拟分析[J].中国科学院大学学报,2014,31(3):380-388.

[12] 张蕾,陈雯,陈晓,等.长江三角洲地区环境污染与经济增长的脱钩时空分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(3):275-279.

[13] 郭亚军,潘建民,曹仲秋.由时序立体数据表支持的动态综合评价方法[J].东北大学学报:自然科学版,2001,22(4):464-467.

[14] 郭亚军, 姚远, 易平涛. 一种动态综合评价方法及应用 [J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2007, 10:154-158.

[15] Yager R R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making [J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man,and Cybernetics, 1988, 18(1): 183-190.

[16] 曾维华, 宋永会, 姚新, 等. 多尺度突发环境污染事故风险区划 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社,2013.

[17] 孙晓蓉,邵超峰.基于DPSIR模型的天津滨海新区环境风险变化趋势分析[J].环境科学研究,2010,23(1):68-73.

[18] 朱华桂.论风险社会中的社区抗逆力问题[J].南京大学学报:哲学·人文科学·社会科学,2012,5:47-53.

[19] 李博,韩增林,孙才志,等.环渤海地区人海资源环境系统脆弱性的时空分析[J].资源科学,2012,34(11):2 214-2 221.

Outlines

/