Welcome to Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Today is

Portfolio selection based on asset selection and the empirical study in Chinese stock market

  • XU Yang ,
  • WANG Yan ,
  • ZHAO Zilong
Expand
  • 1. School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Chinese Acadamy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    2. Academy of Mahtematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received date: 2014-07-04

  Revised date: 2014-11-15

  Online published: 2015-07-15

Abstract

Lars-Lasso regression algorithm is a popular statistical element method. For the investment markets with large amount of assets, we apply the Lars-Lasso method to the asset selection, which is the first step of portfolio selection, and then use the portfolio optimization model. The utility of this approach is illustrated by empirical studies on Chinese stock market, and it is verified to have better performance than the market index.

Cite this article

XU Yang , WANG Yan , ZHAO Zilong . Portfolio selection based on asset selection and the empirical study in Chinese stock market[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015 , 32(4) : 446 -452 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2015.04.004

References

[1] Markowitz H. Portfolio selection [J]. Journal of Finance, 1952, 7(1):77-91.
[2] Markowitz H. Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments[M]. New York: John Wile and Sons, Ltd.1959.
[3] Bawa V S. Optimal rules for ordering uncertain prospects [J]. Journal of Finance Economics Letters, 1975, 2(1):95-121.
[4] Fishburn P C. Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns [J]. American Econimic Review, 1977, 67:116-126.
[5] Ahn D H, Jacob B, Matthew R. et al. Optimal risk management using options [J]. Journal of Finance, 1999, 54(1):359- 375.
[6] Basak S, Shapiro A. Value-at-risk-based risk management: optimal policies and asset prices [J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2001, 14(2):371-405.
[7] Rockfellar R T, Uryasev S. Optimization of conditional value-at-risk [J]. The Journal of Risk, 2000, 2(3):21-41.
[8] Goldfarb D, Iyengar G. Robust portfolio selection problems [J]. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2003, 28:1-38.
[9] El Ghaoui, Oks M, Oustry F. Worst-case value-at-risk and robust portfolio optimization: a conic programming approach [J]. Operations Research, 2003, 51:543-556.
[10] Zymler S, Kuhn D, Rustem B. 2009. Worst-case value-at-risk of non-linear portfolios [J]. Management Science, 2013, 59(1):172-188.
[11] Pinar M C, Pac A B. Mean semi-deviation from a target and robust portfolio choice under distribution and mean return ambiguity[J]. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2013, 259:394-405.
[12] Breiman L. Classication and regression trees [M]. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1993.
[13] Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso [J]. Journal of the Royal Statistics Society, 1996, 58:267-288.
[14] Efron B, Hastie T, Johnstone I, et al. Least angle regression [J]. Annals of Statist, 2004, 32:407-451.
[15] Fan J, Zhang J, Yu K. Vast portfolio selection with gross-exposure constraints [J]. Journal of American Statistical Association, 2012, 107:592-60.
[16] Jagannathan R, Ma T. Risk reduction in large portfolios: why imposing the wrong constraints helps [J]. Journal of Finance, 2003, 58:1 651-1 683.
[17] Chen L, He S, Zhang S H. Tight bounds for some risk measures, with applications to robust portfolio selection [J]. Operations Research, 2011, 59(4):847-865.
[18] 张忠桢. 二次规划-非线性规划与投资组合的算法线性规划 [M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社, 2006: 152-154.
[19] Morgan J P. Risk Metrics[M]. 2nd ed. J P Morgan, 1994.
Outlines

/