Based on the Ansys Fluent platform along with its secondary development programs, this research developed a comprehensive numerical model for mercury capture by activated carbon injection and particle migration within an electrostatic precipitator (ESP). The multi-field model coupled sub-models such as flow field, electric field, mercury adsorption, particle charging, and particle motion. The mechanisms and crucial operation parameters of mercury adsorption by suspended activated carbon particles in electrostatic precipitators are fully discussed. The results show that both activated carbon particle size and ion wind effects have great impacts on combined removal efficiency of the mercury and particles. Reducing the size of sorbent particles (activated carbon) can promote mercury removal efficiency while decreasing the particle collection efficiency,the mercury removal efficiency will be 89.6% while the particle size is 5 μm. Additionally, the ion wind has distinct effects on the two mercury adsorption mechanisms in an ESP where the adsorption mechanism of mercury by suspended activated carbon particles is dominant, while the mercury capture efficiency near the wall is at a low level which is below 9%. The comparison between the experimental data and numerical results demonstrates that this model is able to predict the mercury removal efficiency by powdered sorbent injection with acceptable accuracy.
FENG Yuxuan
,
LUO Kun
,
FAN Jianren
. Numerical research on mechanisms of the mercury capture by activated carbon injection within an electrostatic precipitator[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021
, 38(2)
: 189
-197
.
DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2021.02.005
[1] Hsi H C,Tsai C Y, Kuo T H, et al. Development of low-concentration mercury adsorbents from biohydrogen-generation agricultural residues using sulfur impregnation[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(16):7470-7477.
[2] 杨振宇, 羌宁, 季学李. 美国燃煤电厂锅炉烟气中汞的研究进展[J]. 能源环境保护, 2003, 17(5):3-7.
[3] Pavlish J H, Sondreal E A, Mann M D, et al. Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2003, 82(2/3):89-165.
[4] United Nations Environment Programme(UNEP). Minamata convention on mercury[R]. Geneva, Switzerland:UNEP, 2013.
[5] Niksa S, Fujiwara N. Estimating Hg emissions from coal-fired power stations in China[J]. Fuel, 2009, 88(1):214-217.
[6] Lee S H, Rhim Y J, Cho S P, et al. Carbon-based novel sorbent for removing gas-phase mercury[J]. Fuel, 2006, 85(2):219-226.
[7] 陶叶. 火电机组烟气脱汞工艺路线选择[J].电力建设,2011,32(4):74-78.
[8] While H J. Industrial electrostatic precipitation[M]. New York:Addison-Wesley,1963.
[9] 周强,段钰锋,洪亚光,等. 模拟烟气活性炭喷射脱汞实验研究[J].中国电机工程学报,2013,33(35):36-43.
[10] 任建莉,周劲松,骆仲泱,等. 活性炭吸附烟气中气态汞的试验研究[J].中国电机工程学报,2004,24(2):171-175.
[11] Clack H L. Particle size distribution effects on gas-particle mass transfer within electrostatic precipitators[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2006, 40:3929-3933.
[12] Lawless P A, Sparks L E. Modeling particulate charging in ESPs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 1988,24:922-927.
[13] Li Y, Zheng C H, Luo K, et al. CFD simulation of high-temperature effect on EHD characteristics in a wire-plate electrostatic precipitator[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2015,23:633-640.
[14] Long Z W, Yao Q. Numerical simulation of the flow and the collection mechanism inside a scale hybrid particulate collector[J]. Powder Technology, 2012, 215/216:26-37.
[15] Luo K, Li Y, Zheng C H, et al. Numerical simulation of temperature effect on particles behavior via electrostatic precipitators[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2015, 88:127-139.
[16] 毕文剑,李艳,罗坤,等.温度对静电除尘器内颗粒受力影响的数值模拟[J].中国科学院大学学报,2017,34(2):172-178.
[17] 近藤精一,石川达雄,安部郁夫.吸附科学[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2005:104-107.
[18] Clack H L. Mass transfer within electrostatic precipitators:in-flight adsorption of mercury by charged suspended particulates[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2006, 40:3617-3622.
