The global ecosystem dynamics investigation(GEDI) is a full-waveform LiDAR system launched by United States in December 2018, which can provide data support for global ground elevation and forest canopy height. In order to adapt to different surface environments, GEDI L2A products provide 6 different algorithms to estimate ground elevation and forest canopy height. The choice of these algorithms will affect the extraction accuracy of surface parameters. In this paper, the digital terrain model and canopy height model obtained by airborne laser scanning data are used as reference data to evaluate the adaptability of different algorithms of the second version of GEDI L2A data under different vegetation coverage values and the impact on the accuracy of ground elevation and forest canopy height. The results show that when the vegetation coverage is less than 0. 2, the result of algorithm 4 is the best, when the coverage is greater than or equal to 0. 8, the result of algorithm 2 is the best, and the result of algorithm 1 is the best under the remaining coverage values. Comparing the optimal algorithm selected in this paper according to the vegetation coverage with the GEDI L2A default optimal algorithm, the results of this paper are generally better than those of the GEDI L2A default optimal algorithm, especially when the coverage value is less than 0. 8 and the slope is greater than or equal to 10°. The optimal algorithm selected in this paper can effectively improve the accuracy of GEDI L2A products for estimating ground elevation and forest canopy height.
LIU Lijuan
,
WANG Cheng
,
NIE Sheng
,
ZHU Xiaoxiao
,
XI Xiaohuan
,
WANG Jinliang
. Analysis of the influence of different algorithms of GEDI L2A on the accuracy of ground elevation and forest canopy height[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022
, 39(4)
: 502
-511
.
DOI: 10.7523/j.ucas.2021.0076
[1] Boucher P, Hancock S, Orwig D, et al. Detecting change in forest structure with simulated GEDI LiDAR waveforms:a case study of the hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA; adelges tsugae) infestation[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(8):1304. DOI:10.3390/rs12081304.
[2] Dubayah R, Blair J B, Goetz S, et al. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation:high-resolution laser ranging of the Earth's forests and topography[J]. Science of Remote Sensing, 2020, 1:100002. DOI:10.1016/j.srs.2020.100002.
[3] Schneider F D, Ferraz A, Hancock S, et al. Towards mapping the diversity of canopy structure from space with GEDI[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2020, 15(11):115006. DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/ab9e99.
[4] 谢栋平,李国元,赵严铭,等.美国GEDI天基激光测高系统及其应用[J].国际太空, 2018(12):39-44. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-2366.2018.12.008.
[5] Spracklen B, Spracklen D V. Determination of structural characteristics of old-growth forest in Ukraine using spaceborne LiDAR[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(7):1233. DOI:10.3390/rs13071233.
[6] Lin X J, Xu M, Cao C X, et al. Estimates of forest canopy height using a combination of ICESat-2/ATLAS data and stereo-photogrammetry[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(21):3649. DOI:10.3390/rs12213649.
[7] Fayad I, Baghdadi N, Bailly J S, et al. Analysis of GEDI elevation data accuracy for inland waterbodies altimetry[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(17), 2714. DOI:10.3390/rs12172714.
[8] Marselis S M, Abernethy K, Alonso A, et al. Evaluating the potential of full-waveform LiDAR for mapping pan-tropical tree species richness[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2020, 29(10):1799-1816. DOI:10.1111/geb.13158.
[9] Rishmawi K, Huang C Q, Zhan X W. Monitoring key forest structure attributes across the conterminous United States by integrating GEDI LiDAR measurements and VIIRS data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(3):442. DOI:10.3390/rs13030442.
[10] Adam M, Urbazaev M, Dubois C, et al. Accuracy assessment of GEDI terrain elevation and canopy height estimates in European temperate forests:influence of environmental and acquisition parameters[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(23):3948. DOI:10.3390/rs12233948.
[11] Beck J, Bradford W, Armston J, et al. GLOBAL ecosystem dynamics investigation (GEDI) level 2 user guide. South Dakota, USA:EROS Center, 2020.(2021-05-07). https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/documents/998/GEDI02_UserGuide_V21.pdf.
[12] Potapov P, Li X Y, Hernandez-Serna A, et al. Mapping global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2021, 253:112165. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2020.112165.
[13] Healey S P, Yang Z Q, Gorelick N, et al. Highly local model calibration with a new GEDI LiDAR asset on google earth engine reduces landsat forest height signal saturation[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(17):2840. DOI:10.3390/rs12172840.
[14] Guerra-Hernández J, Pascual A. Using GEDI LiDAR data and airborne laser scanning to assess height growth dynamics in fast-growing species:a showcase in Spain[J]. Forest Ecosystems, 2021, 8:14. DOI:10.1186/s40663-021-00291-2.
[15] Hofton M, Blair J B, Story S, et al. Algorithm theoretical basis document (ATBD) for GEDI transmit and receive waveform processing for L1 and L2 products. Goddard Space Flight Centre, 2019.(2019-12-04). https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/documents/581/GEDI_WF_ATBD_v1.0.pdf.
[16] White J C, Coops N C, Wulder M A, et al. Remote sensing technologies for enhancing forest inventories:a review[J]. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 2016, 42(5):619-641. DOI:10.1080/07038992.2016.1207484.
[17] Scholl V, Cattau M, Joseph M, et al. Integrating national ecological observatory network (NEON) airborne remote sensing and in-situ data for optimal tree species classification[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(9):1414. DOI:10.3390/rs12091414.
[18] Liu A B, Cheng X, Chen Z Q. Performance evaluation of GEDI and ICESat-2 laser altimeter data for terrain and canopy height retrievals[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2021, 264:112571. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2021.112571.
[19] Goulden T, Scholl V. NEON algorithm theoretical basis document (ATBD):ecosystem structure. NEON, 2019.(2019-07-01). https://data.neonscience.org/api/v0/documents/NEON.DOC.002387vA.
