Status on remediation of contaminated sites in developed countries and regions, such as the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Japan, and Taiwan, were reviewed in this paper, including legislations, pollutants of concern, technologies, source of remediation funds, verification of remediation. Then, the similarities and differences of the five aspects in these five countries and Taiwan with mainland China were compared. The results showed that China had made special legislation for soil pollution prevention and control, the number of contaminated sites is expected to be initially figured out after the detailed soil survey, and the gap with developed countries and regions has been significantly reduced. However, it is still facing the fact that government is mainly responsible for the remediation of historical sites, extensive technology prevails and lone time-consuming verification of remediation. The implementation of the "Soil Pollution Prevention Law" should be taken as an opportunity, combined with the implementation of accountability, effectiveness evaluation, damage compensation and other systems, to properly solve the problem of remediation funds, strictly control historical pollution risks, effectively prevent and control new pollution, build a long-term management mechanism for risk management and restoration of contaminated sites, and maximize environmental, economic and social benefits.
ZHAO Dan
,
YU Fang
,
LIAO Xiaoyong
,
WANG Bin
,
SUN Qian
,
TAO Huan
,
WU Weida
,
ZHOU You
. Status of remediation for contaminated sites in developed countries and regions and its enlightenment to China[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023
, 40(4)
: 441
-452
.
DOI: 10.7523/j.ucas.2022.014
[1] 王国庆. 荷兰土壤/场地污染治理经验[J]. 世界环境, 2016(4):25-26. DOI:CNKI:SUN:SJHJ.0.2016-04-012.
[2] Ministry of the Environment in Government of Japan. Conservation of soil environment[EB/OL].[2021-10-10]. http://www.env.go.jp/en/water/wq/wemj/soil.html.
[3] 郭小品, 付融冰, 徐珍. 中国台湾地区土壤及地下水污染整治管理与经验[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2015, 37(2):1-7. DOI:10.15985/j.cnki.1001-3865.2015.02.001.
[4] United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA). Number of NPL site actions and milestones by fiscal year[EB/OL]. (2021-03-15)[2021-10-10]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/number-npl-site-actions-and-milestones-fiscal-year.
[5] Environmental Agency. Dealing with contaminated land in England:a review of progress from April 2000 to December 2013 with Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990[R/OL]. (2016-05-10)[2021-10-10]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/513158/State_of_contaminated_land_report.pdf.
[6] Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan Secretariat (Contaminated Sites Division), Canada. Federal contaminated sites action plan annual report[R/OL]. (2010-2017)[2022-02-28]. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/federal-contaminated-sites/publications.html.
[7] Ministry of the Environment. Government of Japan, Environmental Policy Bureau. Annual report on environmental statistics 2016[R/OL].[2021-10-10]. https://www.env.go.jp/en/statistics/contents/2016/E2016_all.pdf.
[8] United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA), Office of Underground Storage Tanks. Semiannual report of UST performance measures mid fiscal year 2019(October 1, 2018-September 30, 2019)[R/OL]. (2020-04)[2022-02-28]. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-11/documents/ca-19-34.pdf.
[9] Liedekerke M V, Prokop G, Rabl-Berger S, et al. Progress in the management of contaminated sites in Europe[R/OL]. (2014-02-27)[2021-10-10]. http://www.eugris.info/displayresource.aspx?r=7697.
[10] 孙飞翔, 李丽平, 原庆丹, 等. 台湾地区土壤及地下水污染整治基金管理经验及其启示[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(4):155-162. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2015.04.020.
[11] United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA). RCRA corrective action:case studies report[R/OL]. (2013-04)[2021-10-10]. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-04/documents/rcracorrective_0.pdf.
[12] United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA). Superfund:national priorities list[EB/OL].(2021-02-08)[2021-10-10]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/superfund-national-priorities-list-npl.
[13] United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA). Brownfields program accomplishments and benefits leveraging resources to revitalize communities[EB/OL]. (2021-10-14)[2022-02-28]. https://www.epa.gov/brownfields/brownfields-program-accomplishments-and-benefits.
[14] Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat in Government of Canada. Contaminants or media in federal contaminated sites inventory[EB/OL].[2021-10-10]. http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/fcsi-rscf/cm-eng.aspx.
[15] Ministry of the Environment. Government of Japan. Water/Atmospheric Environment. The results of the survey on enforcement status of the Soil Contamination Countermeasures Act & numbers and trends of soil contamination investigations and countermeasures in the fiscal year 2016[R/OL]. (2018-04-17)[2021-10-10]. http://www.env.go.jp/press/files/en/759.pdf.
[16] Environmental Agency. Dealing with contaminated land in England. Progress in 2002 with implementing the Part IIA regime[R/OL]. (2008-04-22)[2021-10-10]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/313967/dealing_with_contaminated_land_i.pdf.
[17] Environmental Agency. Dealing with contaminated land in England and Wales:a review of progress from 2000-2007 with Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act[R/OL]. (2009-02-19)[2021-10-10]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/313964/geho0109bpha-e-e.pdf.
[18] United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA). Superfund remedy report[R/OL]. 14th ed. (2013-11)[2021-10-10]. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/srr_14th_2013nov.pdf.
[19] United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA). Superfund remedy report[R/OL]. 15th ed. (2017-07)[2021-10-10]. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-09/documents/100000349.pdf.
[20] United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA). Superfund remedy report[R/OL]. 16th ed. (2020-07)[2021-10-10]. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/documents/100002509.pdf.
[21] Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer, Canada. Federal contaminated sites cost[R/OL]. (2014-04-10)[2021-10-10]. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2014/dpb-pbo/YN5-64-2014-eng.pdf.
[22] 龚宇阳, 王静. 美国超级基金法对我国污染场地修复的启示[J]. 世界环境, 2016(4):21-24. DOI:CNKI:SUN:SJHJ.0.2016-04-011.
[23] Ministry for the Environment, New Zealand. Contaminated sites remediation fund[EB/OL]. (2021-11-12)[2022-02-28]. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/more/funding/contaminated-sites-remediation-fund.
[24] 臧文超, 丁文娟, 张俊丽, 等. 发达国家和地区污染场地法律制度体系及启示[J]. 环境保护科学, 2016, 42(4):1-5. DOI:10.16803/j.cnki.issn.1004-6216.2016.04.001.
[25] 刘静. 预防与修复:荷兰土壤污染法律责任及资金保障机制评析[J]. 法学评论, 2016, 34(3):163-172. DOI:10.13415/j.cnki.fxpl.2016.03.017.
[26] United States Govermant Accountability Office. Trends in federal funding and cleanup of EPA's nonfederal national priorities list sites[R/OL]. (2015-10-26)[2021-10-10]. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-15-812.pdf.
[27] United States Govermant Accountability Office. EPA's estimated costs to remediate existing sites exceed current funding levels, and more sites are expected to be added to the national priorities list[R/OL]. (2010-06-22)[2021-10-10]. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-10-380.pdf.
[28] 姜林, 樊艳玲, 钟茂生, 等. 我国污染场地管理技术标准体系探讨[J]. 环境保护, 2017, 45(9):38-43. DOI:10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2017.09.008.
[29] 王艳伟, 李书鹏, 康绍果, 等. 中国工业污染场地修复发展状况分析[J]. 环境工程, 2017, 35(10):175-178. DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.201710036.
[30] 陈有鑑. 生态文明视角下土壤修复行业发展新方向:兼谈运用马克思主义原理破解土壤修复财政难题[J]. 中国国土资源经济, 2019, 32(2):15-24. DOI:10.19676/j.cnki.1672-6995.0000198.
[31] 郭媛媛, 江河, 沈鹏. 在我国土壤污染治理中推行"场地修复+"模式的思考与建议[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2019, 44(4):126-129. DOI:10.19758/j.cnki.issn1673-288x.201904126.
[32] 马妍, 王盾, 徐竹, 等. 北京市工业污染场地修复现状、问题及对策[J]. 环境工程, 2017, 35(10):120-124. DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.201710025.
[33] 李春平, 陈梦舫, 骆永明, 等. 重点行业的关注污染物与环境危害简析[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2011, 23(3):7-13. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2009.2011.03.003.
[34] 廖晓勇, 崇忠义, 阎秀兰, 等. 城市工业污染场地:中国环境修复领域的新课题[J]. 环境科学, 2011, 32(3):784-794. DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.2011.03.024.
[35] 杨洁, 黄沈发. 污染场地环境监管的上海路径[J]. 环境经济, 2016(S8):28-31.
[36] 罗帅, 马新月, 王东, 等. 重庆市场地土壤污染特征分析及行业来源识别[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(4):810-818. DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2020.04.022.
[37] 谭海剑, 黄祖照, 宋清梅, 等. 粤港澳大湾区典型城市遗留地块土壤污染特征研究[J]. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34(4):976-986. DOI:10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.11.27.
[38] 张娟, 邢轶兰, 李书鹏, 等. 土壤与地下水修复行业2017年发展综述[J]. 中国环保产业, 2018(11):5-19, 24. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5377.2018.11.001.
