Welcome to Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Today is
Research Articles

Could tripartite Leggett-type nonlocality be tested?

  • KHAN Abdul ,
  • YANG Macheng ,
  • QIAO Congfeng
Expand
  • 1. School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Vacuum Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2021-05-28

  Revised date: 2021-06-03

  Online published: 2021-06-03

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China (11975236, 11635009)

Abstract

The Leggett inequality is a constraint on the bipartite correlation that admits certain types of nonlocalities. Could such constraints be obtained for more parties? Here in search for the answer we found new inequalities for three parties which could be used to check the compatibility between quantum mechanics and nonlocal realism. For certain measurement settings violations are found for GHZ, W and an arbitrary three-qubit pure states. Our inequalities are stronger than the existing inequality in literature (arXiv:1111. 4119v1). These experimentally realizable inequalities, generalization to n-parties possible, could better our explanations for nonlocal correlations in multiparty case, along with some applications in cryptographic key distribution beyond the standard quantum key distribution schemes.

Cite this article

KHAN Abdul , YANG Macheng , QIAO Congfeng . Could tripartite Leggett-type nonlocality be tested?[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023 , 40(3) : 297 -302 . DOI: 10.7523/j.ucas.2021.0087

References

[1] Bell J S. On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox[J]. Physics Physique Fizika, 1964, 1(3):195-200. DOI:10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195.
[2] Clauser J F, Horne M A, Shimony A, et al. Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1969, 23(15):880-884. DOI:10.1103/PhysrevLett.23.880.
[3] Clauser J F, Horne M A. Experimental consequences of objective local theories[J]. Physical Review D, 1974, 10(2):526-535. DOI:10.1103/Physrevd.10.526.
[4] Aspect A. Bell's theorem:the naive view of an experimentalist[M]//Bertlmann R A, Zeilinger A. Quantum[Un] speakables:from Bell to quantum information. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag, 2002. DOI:10.1007/978-3-662-05032-3_9.
[5] Rowe M A, Kielpinski D, Meyer V, et al. Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection[J]. Nature, 2001, 409(6822):791-794. DOI:10.1038/35057215.
[6] Brunner N, Cavalcanti D, Pironio S, et al. Bell nonlocality[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2014, 86(2):419-478. DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.86.839.
[7] Qian C, Li J L, Khan A S, et al. Nonlocal correlation of spin in high energy physics[J]. Physical Review D, 2020, 101(11):116004. DOI:10.1103/Physrevd.101.116004.
[8] Leggett A J. Nonlocal hidden-variable theories and quantum mechanics:an incompatible theorem[J]. Foundations of Physics, 2003, 33(10):1469-1493. DOI:10.1023/A:1026096313729.
[9] Gröeblacher S, Paterek T, Kaltenbaek R, et al. An experimental test of non-local realism[J]. Nature, 2007, 446(7138):871-875. DOI:10.1038/nature05677.
[10] Paterek T, Fedrizzi A, Gröblacher S, et al. Experimental test of nonlocal realistic theories without the rotational symmetry assumption[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2007, 99(21):210406. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.210406.
[11] Branciard C, Ling A, Gisin N, et al. Experimental falsification of Leggett's nonlocal variable model[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2007, 99(21):210407. DOI:10.1103/PhysrevLett.99.210407.
[12] Branciard C, Brunner N, Gisin N, et al. Testing quantum correlations versus single-particle properties within Leggett's model and beyond[J]. Nature Physics, 2008, 4(9):681-685. DOI:10.1038/nphys1020.
[13] Hasegawa Y, Schmitzer C, Bartosik H, et al. Falsification of Leggett's model using neutron matter waves[J]. New Journal of Physics, 2012, 14(2):023039. DOI:10.1088/1367-2630/14/2/023039.
[14] Huang X, Ouyang X, Lian W, et al. Experimental test of Leggett's inequalities with solid-state spins[J]. Physical Review A, 2020, 102(1):012210. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.102.012210.
[15] Khan A S, Li J L, Qiao C F. Test of nonlocal hidden variable theory by the Leggett inequality in high energy physics[J]. Physical Review D, 2020, 101(9):096016. DOI:10.1103/Physrevd.101.096016.
[16] Svetlichny G. Distinguishing three-body from two-body nonseparability by a Bell-type inequality[J]. Physical Review D, 1987, 35(10):3066. DOI:10.1103/physrevd.35.3066.
[17] Bancal J D, Branciard C, Gisin N. Simulation of equatorial von Neumann measurements on GHZ states using nonlocal resources[J]. Advances in Mathematical Physics, 2010, 2010(293245):1-14. DOI:10.1155/2010/293245.
[18] Deng D L, Wu C, Chen J L, et al. Multipartite Leggett-type inequalities[EB/OL]. arXiv:1111.4119v1. (2011-11-07)[2021-06-01]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.4119.
[19] Cereceda J L. Three-particle entanglement versus three-particle nonlocality[J]. Physical Review A, 2002, 66(2):024102. DOI:10.1103/physreva.66.024102.
[20] Acín A, Andrianov A, Jane' E, et al. Three-qubit pure-state canonical forms[J]. Journal of Physics A:Mathematical and General, 2001, 34(35):6725. DOI:10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/301.
[21] Emary C, Beenakker C W J. Relation between entanglement measures and Bell inequalities for three qubits[J]. Physical Review A, 2004, 69(3):032317.DOI:10.1103/physreva.69.032317.
[22] Scarani V. Bell nonlocality[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2019.
Outlines

/