Public participation, environmental regulation, and residents' well-being: a bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace

ZOU Yurou; LIU Hong; LYU Chen

doi:10.7523/j.ucas.2023.080

Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences >

2025 , Vol. 42 >Issue 1: 134 - 144

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7523/j.ucas.2023.080

Brief Report

Public participation, environmental regulation, and residents' well-being: a bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace

ZOU Yurou ,
LIU Hong ,
LYU Chen

Expand

School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2023-06-08

Revised date: 2023-10-08

Online published: 2023-10-08

Fold

Abstract

The research on the relationship between public participation, environmental regulation and residents’ well-being is of great significance for the scientific formulation of environmental regulation policies and the optimization of the governance environment. Using the data of journal papers collected by Web of Science and CNKI from 2006 to 2021, using CiteSpace bibliometric analysis software and combining with traditional review methods, this paper draws the following conclusions: 1) Chinese literature research hotspots have gone through three stages: the western experience discussion of public participation in environmental governance and the initial stage in China, the theoretical model analysis of public participation in environmental governance and the empirical research stage of influencing factors, the evaluation of residents’ well-being effect of environmental regulation and the specific case study of public participation in environmental regulation. English literature research initially focused on the participation of residents at the community level in environmental regulation, and then focused on the exploration of problems and influencing factors in practice. At present, it focuses on the impact of environmental regulation on residents’ well-being and environmental health inequity and big data analysis applications； 2) The academic community has not yet reached a consistent conclusion on the impact of public participation in environmental regulation and residents’ well-being. The study confirms that environmental regulation has a positive impact on residents’ health and enhances individual subjective well-being, but at the same time it exacerbates the income gap between residents and between regions； 3) The research trend shows that the research perspective changes from macro to micro, the research method changes from statistical model to spatial analysis and quasi-natural experiment method, and the variable measurement changes from single index to comprehensive index； 4) Future research needs to focus on the analysis and optimization of government response mechanism, the research on the equity of environmental regulations on residents’ well-being, and the improvement and perfection of research methods, data, and variable measurement methods.

Key words： environmental regulation; public participation; welfare of residents; knowledge map; CiteSpace

Cite this article

ZOU Yurou , LIU Hong , LYU Chen . Public participation, environmental regulation, and residents' well-being: a bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2025 , 42(1) : 134 -144 . DOI: 10.7523/j.ucas.2023.080

References

[1] 陶燕, 刘亚梦, 米生权, 等. 大气细颗粒物的污染特征及对人体健康的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2014, 34(3): 592-597. DOI: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2014.0107.
[2] Stewart R B. A new generation of environmental regulation[J]. Capital University Law Review, 2001, 29(1): 21-182.
[3] 何兴邦. 环境规制与城镇居民收入不平等: 基于异质型规制工具的视角[J]. 财经论丛, 2019(6): 104-112. DOI: 10.13762/j.cnki.cjlc.20190218.002.
[4] 张为杰. 生态文明导向下中国的公众环境诉求与辖区政府环境政策回应[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2017(1): 54-61, 147. DOI: 10.16304/j.cnki.11-3952/f.2017.01.006.
[5] 张金香, 王德轩. 环境影响评价中的公众参与机制研究[J]. 中国环境管理, 2013, 5(6): 23-26. DOI: 10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2013.06.005.
[6] 张艳纯, 陈安琪. 公众参与和环境规制对环境治理的影响: 基于省级面板数据的分析[J]. 城市问题, 2018(1): 74-80. DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.180110.
[7] 谌杨. 论中国环境多元共治体系中的制衡逻辑[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(6): 116-125. DOI: 10.12062/cpre.20200125.
[8] 肖汉雄. 不同公众参与模式对环境规制强度的影响: 基于空间杜宾模型的实证研究[J]. 财经论丛, 2019(1): 100-109. DOI: 10.13762/j.cnki.cjlc.20181013.009.
[9] 王柱国. 论环境规制中的公众参与[J]. 行政论坛, 2014, 21(6): 69-74. DOI: 10.16637/j.cnki.23-1360/d.2014.06.018.
[10] 毛萍, 赵鹤凌, 张轶佳, 等. 生态环境中的人类福祉研究热点问题分析[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2022, 44(6): 799-812. DOI: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2022.03.001.
[11] 宋敏, 韩曼曼. 生态福祉视角下的农地城市流转生态补偿机制: 研究进展与框架构建[J]. 农业经济问题, 2016, 37(11): 94-103, 112. DOI: 10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2016.11.011.
[12] Altindag D T, Xu J Y. Life satisfaction and preferences over economic growth and institutional quality[J]. Journal of Labor Research, 2017, 38(1): 100-121. DOI: 10.1007/s12122-016-9235-2.
[13] 陈卫东, 杨若愚. 政府监管、公众参与和环境治理满意度: 基于CGSS2015数据的实证研究[J]. 软科学, 2018, 32(11): 49-53. DOI: 10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2018.11.11.
[14] 李梦洁. 环境污染、政府规制与居民幸福感: 基于CGSS(2008)微观调查数据的经验分析[J]. 当代经济科学, 2015, 37(5): 59-68, 126. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2848.2015.05.007.
[15] 宋德勇, 杨秋月, 程星. 环境规制提高了居民主观幸福感吗?: 来自中国的经验证据[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2019(1): 7-15. DOI: 10.13891/j.cnki.mer.2019.01.002.
[16] 肖罗, 魏春雨. 基于CSSCI的中国乡村聚落形态研究知识图谱分析[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(4): 148-157. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.04.018.
[17] 陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(2): 242-253. DOI: 10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.2015.02.009.
[18] 黄栋, 匡立余. 利益相关者与城市生态环境的共同治理[J]. 中国行政管理, 2006(8): 48-51. DOI: 10.3782/j.issn.1006-0863.2006.08.015.
[19] 李永友, 沈坤荣. 我国污染控制政策的减排效果: 基于省际工业污染数据的实证分析[J]. 管理世界, 2008(7): 7-17. DOI: 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2008.07.002.
[20] 张文明. “多元共治”环境治理体系内涵与路径探析[J]. 行政管理改革, 2017(2): 31-35. DOI: 10.14150/j.cnki.1674-7453.2017.02.006.
[21] 余敏江. 论区域生态环境协同治理的制度基础: 基于社会学制度主义的分析视角[J]. 理论探讨, 2013(2): 13-17, 2. DOI: 10.16354/j.cnki.23-1013/d.2013.02.009.
[22] 吴建南, 徐萌萌, 马艺源. 环保考核、公众参与和治理效果: 来自31个省级行政区的证据[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016(9): 75-81. DOI: 10.3782/j.issn.1006-0863.2016.09.14.
[23] 王丽丽, 张晓杰. 城市居民参与环境治理行为的影响因素分析: 基于计划行为和规范激活理论[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 18(6): 92-98. DOI: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau(ss).2017.06.014.
[24] 彭小霞. 我国农村生态环境治理的社区参与机制探析[J]. 理论月刊, 2016(11): 170-176. DOI: 10.14180/j.cnki.1004-0544.2016.11.031.
[25] 初钊鹏, 卞晨, 刘昌新, 等. 雾霾污染、规制治理与公众参与的演化仿真研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(7): 101-111. DOI: 10.12062/cpre.20190308.
[26] 范子英, 赵仁杰. 法治强化能够促进污染治理吗?: 来自环保法庭设立的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(3): 21-37.
[27] 郭施宏. 中央环保督察的制度逻辑与延续: 基于督察制度的比较研究[J]. 中国特色社会主义研究, 2019(5): 83-91.
[28] 王学婷, 张俊飚, 何可, 等. 农村居民生活垃圾合作治理参与行为研究:基于心理感知和环境干预的分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(2): 459-468. DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201902022.
[29] 涂正革, 邓辉, 甘天琦. 公众参与中国环境治理的逻辑: 理论、实践和模式[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2018, 57(3): 49-61. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2456.2018.03.005.
[30] 崔晶. “运动式应对”：基层环境治理中政策执行的策略选择: 基于华北地区Y小镇的案例研究[J]. 公共管理学报, 2020, 17(4): 32-42, 166. DOI: 10.16149/j.cnki.23-1523.2020.04.001.
[31] Hampton G. Narrative policy analysis and the integration of public involvement in decision making[J]. Policy Sciences, 2009, 42(3): 227-242. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-009-9087-1.
[32] Glucker A N, Driessen P P J, Kolhoff A, et al. Public participation in environmental impact assessment: why, who and how? [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2013, 43: 104-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.06.003.
[33] Daley D M. Public participation and environmental policy: what factors shape state agency’s public participation provisions? [J]. Review of Policy Research, 2008, 25(1): 21-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00307.x.
[34] Van Der Horst D. NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies[J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(5): 2705-2714. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.012.
[35] Chi C S F, Xu J H, Xue L. Public participation in environmental impact assessment for public projects: a case of non-participation[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2014, 57(9): 1422-1440. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2013.810550.
[36] Pappila M, Pölönen I. Reconsidering the role of public participation in the Finnish forest planning system[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2012, 27(2): 177-185. DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2011.635084.
[37] Harring N, Jagers S C. Should we trust in values? Explaining public support for pro-environmental taxes[J]. Sustainability, 2013, 5(1): 210-227. DOI: 10.3390/su5010210.
[38] Salvaggio M, Futrell R, Batson C D, et al. Water scarcity in the desert metropolis: how environmental values, knowledge and concern affect Las Vegas residents’ support for water conservation policy[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2014, 57(4): 588-611. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2012.756806.
[39] Hickey G M, Forest P, Sandall J L, et al. Managing the environmental science-policy nexus in government: perspectives from public servants in Canada and Australia[J]. Science and Public Policy, 2013, 40(4): 529-543. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/sct004.
[40] Tang L W, Li K, Jia P R. Impact of environmental regulations on environmental quality and public health in China: empirical analysis with panel data approach[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(2): 623. DOI: 10.3390/su12020623.
[41] Liu Y, Li R L, Song Y, et al. The role of environmental tax in alleviating the impact of environmental pollution on residents’ happiness in China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(22): 4574. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16224574.
[42] Guo S, Wang W W, Zhang M. Exploring the impact of environmental regulations on happiness: new evidence from China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27(16): 19484-19501. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08508-7.
[43] Song Y, Guo S, Zhang M. Will environmental regulations affect subjective well-being?: a cross-region analysis in China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(28): 29191-29211. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06147-1.
[44] Liu X, Guo S Q. Inclusive finance, environmental regulation, and public health in China: lessons for the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Frontiers in Public Health, 2021, 9: 662166. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.662166.
[45] Yuan M. How the perception of public official on organizational culture influences procedural justice in environmental policy processes[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12: 626210. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626210.
[46] Wikstrom K, Miller T, Campbell H E, et al. Environmental inequities and water policy during a drought: burdened communities, minority residents, and cutback assignments[J]. Review of Policy Research, 2019, 36(1): 4-27. DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12301.
[47] Kombat A M, Wätzold F. The emergence of environmental taxes in Ghana: a public choice analysis[J]. Environmental Policy and Governance, 2019, 29(1): 46-54. DOI: 10.1002/eet.1829.
[48] Zheng Y, Yang R Y. Environmental regulation, public participation and happiness: empirical research based on Chinese general social survey of 2015[J]. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2019, 17(4): 9317-9332. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1704_93179332.
[49] 孙伟增, 罗党论, 郑思齐, 等. 环保考核、地方官员晋升与环境治理: 基于2004—2009年中国86个重点城市的经验证据[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2014, 29(4): 49-62, 171. DOI: 10.13613/j.cnki.qhdz.002241.
[50] 郑思齐, 万广华, 孙伟增, 等. 公众诉求与城市环境治理[J]. 管理世界, 2013(6): 72-84. DOI: 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2013.06.006.
[51] 张国兴, 邓娜娜, 管欣, 等. 公众环境监督行为、公众环境参与政策对工业污染治理效率的影响: 基于中国省级面板数据的实证分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(1): 144-151. DOI: 10.12062/cpre.20180928.
[52] 胡逸群, 赵莉, 杨昌龙. 公众投诉、环境规制对工业技术创新的影响研究[J]. 中国环境管理, 2022, 14(3): 105-111, 96. DOI: 10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2022.03.105.
[53] 曾世宏, 夏杰长. 公地悲剧、交易费用与雾霾治理:环境技术服务有效供给的制度思考[J]. 财经问题研究, 2015(1): 10-15. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-176X.2015.01.002.
[54] 韩超, 张伟广, 单双. 规制治理、公众诉求与环境污染: 基于地区间环境治理策略互动的经验分析[J]. 财贸经济, 2016, 37(9): 144-161. DOI: 10.19795/j.cnki.cn11-1166/f.2016.09.011.
[55] 薛澜, 董秀海. 基于委托代理模型的环境治理公众参与研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(10): 48-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2010.10.009.
[56] 张宏翔, 王铭槿. 公众环保诉求的溢出效应: 基于省际环境规制互动的视角[J]. 统计研究, 2020, 37(10): 29-38. DOI: 10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2020.10.003.
[57] 张生玲, 李跃. 雾霾社会舆论爆发前后地方政府减排策略差异: 存在舆论漠视或舆论政策效应吗? [J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2016(3): 52-60.
[58] 张国兴, 张振华, 高杨, 等. 环境规制政策与公共健康: 基于环境污染的中介效应检验[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(2): 361-373. DOI: 10.12011/1000-6788(2018)02-0361-13.
[59] 包彤. 环境规制扩大还是缩小了城乡收入差距?: 基于经济效率和经济结构双重视角[J]. 云南财经大学学报, 2022, 38(3): 1-20. DOI: 10.16537/j.cnki.jynufe.000767.
[60] 刘荣增, 何春. 环境规制对城镇居民收入不平等的门槛效应研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2021(8): 41-52.
[61] 廖显春, 李小慧, 施训鹏. 绿色投资对绿色福利的影响机制研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(2): 148-157. DOI: 10.12062/cpre.20191004.
[62] 常明, 奚云霄, 宫响. 公众能否准确评价政府环保成效: 基于CGSS2015的实证分析[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(9): 212-215.
[63] 于文超, 高楠, 龚强. 公众诉求、官员激励与地区环境治理[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2014(5): 23-35, 10, 156-157. DOI: 10.14167/j.zjss.2014.05.001.
[64] 张华. 地区间环境规制的策略互动研究: 对环境规制非完全执行普遍性的解释[J]. 中国工业经济, 2016(7): 74-90. DOI: 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2016.07.006.
[65] 马青, 傅强, 王庆宇. 产业绿色转型能缓解城乡收入不平等吗?: 基于政府规制的耦合互动分析[J]. 经济问题探索, 2019(11): 94-111.
[66] 胡善联, 杜卫民. 经济发展与改革对健康的影响[J]. 中国卫生经济, 1995, 14(1): 12-15.
[67] 孙涵, 聂飞飞, 申俊, 等. 空气污染、空间外溢与公共健康: 以中国珠江三角洲9个城市为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(9): 35-45. DOI: 10.12062/cpre.20170469.

Options

Outlines

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References