Welcome to Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Today is
Environmental Science & Geography

Spatial and temporal differences in value of regional advantageous natural resource assets: taking Yunfu City, Guangdong Province as an example

  • Xianjiang LI ,
  • Shuqin SHI ,
  • Jinqiu ZOU ,
  • Hao CHEN ,
  • Linhong CHEN
Expand
  • 1.College of Environmental Science and Engineering,Tiangong University,Tianjin 300387,China
    2.Yunfu Urban and Rural Planning Research Center,Yunfu 527300,Guangdong,China
    3.Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100081,China
    4.Key Laboratory of Agricultural Remote Sensing,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,Beijing 100081,China

Received date: 2023-12-08

  Accepted date: 2024-05-23

  Online published: 2024-06-11

Abstract

Based on the current situation and price data of forest land and mineral resources in Yunfu City of Guangdong Province, in 2010, 2015,and 2020, using geostatistical analysis techniques, dynamic index, and accounting models for economic value and ecological value, this paper explores the spatial-temporal differentiation of the value of regional advantageous natural resources assets, and reveals the dynamic changes of the physical quantity and value of forest land and mineral resources assets in Yunfu City. The results show that: in terms of the physical quantity of assets, the forest land and mineral resources in Yunfu City decreased by 1 622.89 and 16.69 hm2 respectively from 2010 to 2015, and increased by 45 877.86 and 485.69 hm2 respectively from 2015 to 2020; in terms of asset value, the value of forest land resources assets (including economic value and ecological value ) increased by 6.164 billion yuan from 2010 to 2015, and the value of mineral resources assets decreased by 272 million yuan. The amount of asset value of forest land resources (including economic value and ecological value) decreased by a total of 1.67 billion yuan from 2015 to 2020, and the amount of asset value of mineral resources increased by a total of 7.956 billion yuan, and the amount of asset value of forest land and mineral resources in Yunfu City experienced more significant changes from 2015 to 2020, and the amount of increase in their physical quantity was higher than the amount of change from 2010 to 2015, and was also higher than the overall amount of change from 2010 to 2020. The value of advantageous natural resource assets in Yunfu City is characterized by obvious spatial and temporal heterogeneity, and factors such as the level of regional economic development and policy regulation have a more significant impact on the amount of natural resource asset value.

Cite this article

Xianjiang LI , Shuqin SHI , Jinqiu ZOU , Hao CHEN , Linhong CHEN . Spatial and temporal differences in value of regional advantageous natural resource assets: taking Yunfu City, Guangdong Province as an example[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2026 , 43(3) : 350 -361 . DOI: 10.7523/j.ucas.2024.055

References

[1] 姜文来. 关于自然资源资产化管理的几个问题[J]. 资源科学200022(1): 5-8. DOI: 10. 3321/j. issn: 1007-7588.2000.01.002 .
[2] 胡文龙, 史丹. 中国自然资源资产负债表框架体系研究: 以SEEA2012、 SNA2008和国家资产负债表为基础的一种思路[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境201525(8): 1-9. DOI: 10. 3969/j. issn. 1002-2104. 2015. 08. 001 .
[3] Repetto R C, Magrath W, Wells M, et al. Wasting assets:natural resources in the national income accounts[R]. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 1989.
[4] Hamilton K, Pearce D, Atkinson G, et al. The policy implications of natural resource and environmental accounting[M]. London: Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, 1994.
[5] Hamilton K, Lutz E. Green national accounts: policy uses and empirical experience[M]. Washington, DC: Environmental Department, World Bank, 1996.
[6] Raju S S, Chand R, Srivastava S K, et al. Comparing performance of various crops in Punjab based on market and economic prices and natural resource accounting[J]. Agricultural Economics Research Review201528: 189-198. DOI: 10. 5958/0974-0279. 2015. 00034. 8 .
[7] Common M. Natural resource accounting and sustainability[J]. The Economic and Labour Relations Review19912(1): 89-121. DOI: 10. 1177/103530469100200107 .
[8] Kopp R J, Smith V K. Valuing natural assets: the economics of natural resource damage assessment[M]. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future,1993.
[9] 孔含笑, 沈镭, 钟帅, 等. 关于自然资源核算的研究进展与争议问题[J]. 自然资源学报201631(3): 363-376. DOI: 10. 11849/zrzyxb. 20150366 .
[10] 史丹, 王俊杰. 自然资源资产负债表研究现状、评述与改进方向[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境202030(1): 1-11. DOI: 10. 12062/cpre. 20191013 .
[11] 吴琼, 马国霞, 高阳, 等. 自然资源资产负债表编制中的环境成本核算及实证研究: 以湖州市为例[J]. 资源科学201840(5): 936-945. DOI: 10. 18402/resci. 2018. 05. 07 .
[12] 朱道林, 张晖, 段文技, 等. 自然资源资产核算的逻辑规则与土地资源资产核算方法探讨[J]. 中国土地科学201933(11): 1-7. DOI: 10. 11994/zgtdkx. 20191108. 090126 .
[13] 博文静, 王莉雁, 操建华, 等. 中国森林生态资产价值评估[J]. 生态学报201737(12): 4182-4190. DOI: 10. 5846/stxb201606161172 .
[14] 李小慧, 刘国印, 郑玉慧, 等. 矿产资源资产价值核算方法研究[J]. 中国矿业202130(11): 18-22. DOI: 10. 12075/j. issn. 1004-4051. 2021. 11. 028 .
[15] 董战峰, 秦克玉, 刘婧雅. 国家重点生态功能区自然资源资产评估框架与方法研究[J]. 生态经济202238(3): 13-21.
[16] 任庆柳, 杨兆萍, 韩芳, 等. 国家公园“资源价值”与“游客感知”对比研究: 以大熊猫国家公园四川片区为例[J]. 中国科学院大学学报202340(3): 333-342. DOI: 10. 7523/j. ucas. 2021. 0075 .
[17] 杨世忠, 谭振华, 王世杰. 论我国自然资源资产负债核算的方法逻辑及系统框架构建[J]. 管理世界202036(11): 132-144. DOI: 10. 19744/j. cnki. 11-1235/f. 2020. 0173 .
[18] 张婕, 刘玉洁, 潘韬, 等. 自然资源资产负债表编制中生态损益核算[J]. 自然资源学报202035(4): 755-766. DOI: 10. 31497/zrzyxb. 20200401 .
[19] 董川永, 高俊峰. 太湖流域西部圩区水域生态服务功能量化评估[J]. 中国科学院大学学报201431(5): 604-612. DOI: 10. 7523/j. issn. 2095-6134. 2014. 05. 005 .
[20] Liu C. A Review of Natural resource asset accounting literature[J]. International Core Journal of Engineering20217(8): 429-432. DOI: 10. 6919/ICJE. 202108_7(8). 0062 .
[21] 杨海乐, 危起伟, 陈家宽. 基于选择容量价值的生态补偿标准与自然资源资产价值核算: 以珠江水资源供应为例[J]. 生态学报202040(10): 3218-3228. DOI: 10. 5846/stxb201903230549 .
[22] Zhu D L, Duan W J, Zhang H, et al. Natural resource balance sheet compilation: a land resource asset accounting case[J]. Journal of Chinese Governance20216(4): 515-536. DOI: 10. 1080/23812346. 2021. 1891721 .
[23] Chen D L, Wang Y, Lu Y Y, et al. Research on land resources asset accounting based on mathematical statistics[C]//2nd International Conference on Applied Mathematics, Modelling, and Intelligent Computing (CAMMIC 2022). March 25-27, 2022. Kunming, China.SPIE, 2022: 237-242. DOI: 10. 1117/12. 2638841 .
[24] Hein L, Bagstad K J, Obst C,et al.Progress in natural capital accounting for ecosystems[J]. Science2020367(6477): 514-515. DOI: 10. 1126/science. aaz8901 .
[25] Barnes J I, MacGregor J J, Nhuleipo O, et al. The value of Namibia’s forest resources: preliminary economic asset and flow accounts[J]. Development Southern Africa201027(2): 159-176. DOI: 10. 1080/03768351003740373 .
[26] 李政, 王孝德, 范振林, 等. 全民所有自然资源资产核算框架与方法研究[J]. 中国国土资源经济202235(10): 30-38. DOI: 10. 19676/j. cnki. 1672-6995. 000781 .
[27] 付岚, 叶有华, 张原, 等. 大气资源资产价值核算技术研究初探: 以深圳为例[J]. 中国环境管理201810(1): 32-37. DOI: 10. 16868/j. cnki. 1674-6252. 2018. 01. 032 .
[28] 邢琦, 朱道林, 王健. 基于SEEA的自然资源资产核算指标的国际比较[J]. 中国环境管理202214(1): 68-77. DOI: 10. 16868/j. cnki. 1674-6252. 2022. 01. 068 .
[29] 李贤江, 石淑芹, 蔡为民, 等. 基于CA-Markov模型的天津滨海新区土地利用变化模拟[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版)201836(3): 133-143. DOI: 10. 16088/j. issn. 1001-6600. 2018. 03. 019 .
[30] 崔莉, 厉新建, 程哲. 自然资源资本化实现机制研究: 以南平市“生态银行”为例[J]. 管理世界201935(9): 95-100. DOI: 10. 19744/j. cnki. 11-1235/f. 2019. 0120 .
[31] 秦静, 吕宾, 王曦, 等. 自然资源资产价值量估算思路探讨[J]. 中国国土资源经济202235(2): 29-35. DOI: 10. 19676/j. cnki. 1672-6995. 000631 .
[32] 国家林业局. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范: [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
[33] 国家市场监督管理总局. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范: [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2020.
[34] 龚诗涵, 肖洋, 方瑜, 等. 中国森林生态系统地表径流调节特征[J]. 生态学报201636(22): 7472-7478. DOI: 10. 5846/stxb201601120081 .
[35] 文雅, 刘晓南, 程炯. 基于USLE的广东省山区土壤侵蚀量估算及特征分析[J]. 水土保持通报201333(4): 112-118. DOI :10. 13961/j. cnki. stbctb. 2013. 04. 046 .
[36] 罗佳, 黎蕾, 姜芸, 等. 湖南省森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 生态科学202241(4): 70-77.DOI: 10. 14108/j. cnki. 1008-8873. 2022. 04. 009 .
[37] 古炎坤, 陈北光, 冯耀华. 广东西江地区杉木人工林地上部分生物量和生产力的研究[J]. 华南农业大学学报19878(1): 41-50.
[38] 丘娟珍. 广东省不同林分土壤A层有机碳密度估算及其影响因素分析[J]. 中南林业调查规划201029(3): 61-64. DOI: 10. 16166/j. cnki. cn43-1095. 2010. 03. 009 .
Outlines

/