Loading...
Welcome to Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Today is

Current Issue

1982, Vol.20, No.3 Previous Issue    Next Issue
On the geographical distribution of the Juglandaceae
Lu An-Ming
1982, 20 (3): 257-274. 
Abstract ( 0 )
 The present paper aims to discuss the geog raphical distribution of the Juglandaceae
on the basis of unity of the phylogeny and the process of dispersal in the plants.
      The paper is divided into the following three parts:
      1.  The systematic positions and the distribution patterns of nine living genera in
the family Juglandaceae (namely, Engelhardia, Oreomunnea, Alfaroa, Pterocarya, Cyclo-
carya, Juglans, Carya, Annamocarya and Platycarya) are briefly discussed.  The evolu-
tional relationships between the different genera of the Juglandaceae are elucidated. The
fossil distribution and the geological date of the plant groups are reviewed.  Through
the analysis for the geographical distribution of the Juglandaceous genera, the distribu-
tion patterns may be divided as follows:
      A.  The tropical distribution pattern
      a. The genera of tropical Asia distribution: Engelhardia, Annamocarya.
      b. The genera of tropical Central America distribution: Oreomunnea, Alfaroa.
      B.  The temperate distribution pattern
      c. The genus of disjunct distribution between Western Asia and Eastern Asia:
Pterocarya.
      d. The genus of disjunct distribution between Eurasia and America: Juglans.
     e. The genus of disjunct distribution between Eastern Asia and North America:
Carya.
     f. The genera whose distribution is confined to Eastern Asia: Cyclocarya, Platy-
carya.
     2.  The distribution of species
     According to Takhtajan’s view point of phytochoria, the number of species in every
region are counted.  It has shown clearily that the Eastern Asian Region and the Coti-
nental South-east Asian Region are most abundant in number of genera and species. Of
the 71 living species, 53 are regional endemic elements, namely 74.6% of the total species.
The author is of the opinion that most endemic species in Eurasia are of old endemic
nature and in America of new endimic nature.  There are now 7 genera and 28 species
in China, whose south-western and central parts are most abundant in species, with Pro-
vince Yunnan being richest in genera and species.
     3.  Discussions of the distribution patterns of the Juglandaceae
A.       The centre of floristic region
B.         The centre of floristic regions is determined by the following two principles:  a.
A large number of species concentrate in a district, namely the centre of the majority;
b.  Species of a district can reflect the main stages of the systematic evolution of the
Juglandaceae, namely the centre of diversity.  It has shown clearly that the southern
part of Eastern Asian region and the northern part of Continental South-east Asian
Region (i.c. Southern China and Northern Indo-China) are the main distribution centre
of the Juglandaceae, while the southern part of Sonora Region and Caribbean Region
 (i.c. South-western U.S.A., Mexico and Central America) are the secondary distribution
centre.
      As far as fossil records goes, it has shown that in Tertiary period the Juglanda-
ceae were widely distributed in northern Eurasia and North America, growing not only
in Europe and the Caucasus but also as far as in Greenland and Alaska.  It may be
considered that the Juglandaceae might be originated from Laurasia.  According to
the analysis of distribution pattern for living primitive genus, for example, Engelhar-
dia, South-western China and Northern Indo-China may be the birthplace of the most
primitive Juglandaceous plants.  It also can be seen that the primitive genera and the
primitive sections of every genus in the Juglandaceae have mostly distributed in the
tropics or subtropics. At the same time, according to the analysis of morphological cha-
racters, such as naked buds in the primitive taxa of this family, it is considered that
this character has relationship with the living conditions of their ancestors.  All the
evidence seems to show that the Juglandaceae are of forest origin in the tropical moun-
tains having seasonal drying period.
      B.  The time of the origin
      The geological times of fossil records are analyzed. It is concluded that the origin
of the Juglandaceae dates back at least as early as the Cretaceous period.
      C.  The routes of despersal
      After the emergence of the Juglandaceous plant on earth, it had first developed and
dispersed in Southern China and Indo-China.  Under conditions of the stable tempera-
ture and humidity in North Hemisphere during the period of its origin and development,
the Juglandaceous plants had rapidly developed and distributed in Eurasia and dis-
persed to North America by two routes: Europe-Greenland-North  America  route  and
Asia-Bering Land-bridge-North America route.  From Central America it later reached
South America.
     D.  The formaation of the modern distribution pattern and reasons for this forma-
tion.
     According to the fossil records, the formation of two disjunct areas was not due to
the origin of synchronous development, nor to the parallel evolution in the two con-
tinents of Eurasia and America, nor can it be interpreted as due to result of transmis-
sive function.  The modern distribution pattern has developed as a result of the tectonic
movement and of the climatic change after the Tertiary period.  Because of the con-
tinental drift, the Eurasian Continent was separated from the North American Conti-
nent, it had formed a disjunction between Eurasia and North America. Especially, under
the glaciation during the Late Tertiary and Quaternary Periods, the continents in Eu-
rasia and North America were covered by ice sheet with the exception of “plant refuges”, most plants in the area were destroyed, but the southern part of Eastern Asia
remained practically intact and most of the plants including the Juglandaceae were
preserved from destruction by ice and thence became a main centre of survival in the
North Hemisphere, likewise, there is another centre of survival in the same latitude in
North America and Central America.
     E.  Finally, the probable evolutionary relationships of the genera of the Juglanda-
ceae is presented by the dendrogram in the text.
Comparative anatomy of conifer leaves
Yao Bi-Jun, Hu Yu-Shi
1982, 20 (3): 275-294. 
Abstract ( 0 )
 The epidermis and internal structure of 103 species and 8 varieties of conifer leaves
belonging to 37 genera of 7 families have been comparatively investigated.  The anato-
mical characters of leaves of all the genera (or sections) studied are described syste-
matically and a key to the genera (or sections) is also presented.
      It is shown that in order to identify at the genus level, the leaf types of Lauben-
Fels’ may be used as the primary characterization.  And it can also be seen that the
following characters which are relatively constant at the genus level provide an im-
portant basis for identification: the epidermal structure, the presence or absence of
hypodermis, the degree of differentiation of mesophyll,  the occurrence  of vascular
bundle sheath or endodermis, the transfusion tissue type, the number and relative spatial
position of vascular bundles, the number and distribution of resin canal and the pre-
sence of sclereid or sclerenchyma.
     The genera of Cupressaceae (except for Juniperus and Sabina) are of scale leaves
(Leaf type-III) with little differences in structural characters. It’s difficult to distin-
guish them from each other.
     In addition, some problems concerning the significance of the resin canal, the endo-
dermis with Casparian-strip, the sclerenchyma and the vascular bundle in identification
are here also discussed.
Taxa nova Rosacearum sinicarum (IV)
Yü Te-Tsun, Lu Ling-Ti
1982, 20 (3): 295-310. 
Abstract ( 0 )
A new species of yellow Camellia from China
Wan Yu, Huang Se-Zei
1982, 20 (3): 316-318. 
Abstract ( 0 )
A new species of Chinese medicinal plant—Uncaria yunnanensis
Hsia Kuang-Cheng, Liu Xue-Ming
1982, 20 (3): 319-320. 
Abstract ( 0 )
A study on the taxonomy and distribution of Lithospermum and Arnebia in China
Zhu Ge-Ling
1982, 20 (3): 323-328. 
Abstract ( 0 )
 Tile distinguishing characters between Lithospermum and Arnebia are tabulated
and these two genera are considered different between each other.  Five species of the
former and six species of the latter are recognized in China, and two keys to species are
given for the two genera respectively.  The pattern of the disjunct distribution of
Lithospermum offici  nale is discussed, and a map of its distribution range is given.
On the status of Liquidambar formosana Hance var. monticola Rehder & Wilson (Hamamelidaceae)
Boufford Daivd E., Spongberg Stephen A.
1982, 20 (3): 329-330. 
Abstract ( 0 )
  Rehder and Wilson (1913) described Liquidambar formosana Hance var. monticola
based on material collected by Wilson in western Hubei and Sichuan Provinces.  An
examination of the type, Wilson 795 (A), reveals that there are three sheets with this
number, all with “Type” in Wilson’handwriting on the label.  These syntypes do not
agree completely with the original description.  They also fall within the range of va-
riation of L. formosana var. formosana based on a comparison of specimens from throu-
ghout the range of the species.  Consequently, we consider L. formosana Hance var.
monticola Rehder & Wilson to be a synonym of L. formosana Hance var. formosana.
Hsüa robusta, a new land plant from the Lower Devonian of Yunnan, China
Li Cheng-Sen
1982, 20 (3): 331-342. 
Abstract ( 0 )
  A new psilophytic plant, Hsüa robusta, is found in the Xujiachong Formation
 (Emsian) of the Lower Devonian from the Qüjing (= Kütsing) district of Yunnan,
 China.  This plant is tentatively referred to the Cooksoniaceae of Rhyniales.
      Hsüa gen. nov.
      Type species: Hsüa robusta (Li et Cai) C. S. Li.
      Diagnosis:  Plants erect and then creeping. Main axes dividing pseudomonopodial-
ly and bearing dichotomous lateral branches which somewhat differentiate into vegeta,
tire and fertile ones, with dichotomous root-like and rhizophore-like appendages.  Spo-
rangia terminal, round to reniform or wide reniform, dehiscing along distal margin into
two equal halves.  Spores homosporous, trilete.  Stomata anomocytic.  Protostele cen-
trarch.
      Hsüia robusta (Li et Cai) C. S. Li, comb. nov.
      Cooksonia zhanyiensis Li et Cai, Acta Geologica Sinica, 52 (1) 1978, p. 10, pl. II,
fig. 6.——Taeniocrada robusta Li et Cai,ib. p. 10, pl. II, fig. 7—14.
      Diagnosis:  Characters same as in generic diagnosis. Main axes 6—10 mm wide and
at least 24 cm long, with vascular strands 1.2—2.4 mm acr  oss.  Fertile branches 3—4
times equally or unequally dichotomous, 10—1.5 mm in width and up to 11 cm in length,
possessing a vascular bundle of 0.5 mm in its greatest diameter.  Branches circinately
coiled in apical regions.  Axial tubercles, root-like and rhizophore— like appendages aris-
ing from the main axes usually anterior to the lateral branches. Axial tubercle round
with a diameter of 2.2—2.4 mm, having a vascular bundle about l mm across.  Root-
like branches 3 times bifurcate, 1—0.3 mm wide and up to 1.5 cm long, with a vascular
bundle about 0.1 mm across.  Rhizophore-like appendages forked, 3—1.7 mm in width,
possessing a vascular bundle of 0.7 mm in its greatest diameter. Root-like protuberances
sometimes arising from rhilzophore-like branches.   Epidermal cells of axes generally
elongate, measuring 60—290μby 25—60 μ.  Stomata mainly fusiform, 90—110 μ long
and 50—60μ wide, consisting of a pair of guard cells enclosing a pore 6—15μ  in length
and 1—3μ  in width.  Cuticle of guard cells quite thick.  Stomatal density about 5 per
mm2.  Sporangia 0.8—4.2 mm high, 1.0—8.2 mm across, usually having a dehiscent distal
border which measures 50—100μ broad.  Demarcation between sporangium and its stalk
quite clear.  Epidermal cells of basal part of sporangial walls elongate, about 100 μ long
and 30μ wide, but those of distal part isodiametrally polygonal, about 50μ in diame-
ter.  Stomata, radially arranged scattering over sporangial walls, generally round about
50μ in diameter and 50 per sporangium.  Spores round, 18—36μ (average 27μ) indiameter, and smooth.  Tracheids of protoxylem about 10μ across; those of metaxylem
about 30μ across, with scalariform thickening.
     This plant is similar to Renalia hueberi Gensel in general morphology, but differs
from the latter in possessing root-like and rhizophore-like branches.
     The generic name is derived from Prof.  Hsü Jen.
     This paper is a thesis for M. Sc.
Two new ferns from Tai Shan, Shandong Province
Li Fa-Zeng, Ni Chen-Kai
1982, 20 (3): 343-346. 
Abstract ( 0 )
Angiopteris sparsisora Ching, sp. nov.—a putative bigeneric hybrid
Ching Ren-Chang, Wang Zhong-Ren
1982, 20 (3): 347-350. 
Abstract ( 0 )
  Angiopteris sparsisora Ching, sp. nov.
     Species nova ab omnibus affinibus adhuc cognitis recedit rhizomate repente, dorsi-
ventrali, habitu minore stipite tenui, levi, paleis  brunneis  lineari-lanceolatis  margine
irregulariter fimbriatis peltati-fixis, pinnulis basi cuneatis vel late cuneatis, distincte
breviterque petiolulatis, soris longitudine variis, inter se separatis a margine magis re-
motis, paraphysibus rudimentalibus brevibus sparse praesentibus.
     Tota planta 1—1.2 m alata, rhizomate repente, carnoso, cylindrico, dorsiventrali, 5—
6 cm diametro, radicoso, apice frondes 2—3 emittente, stipite 35—70 cm longo, 4—8 mm
crasso, levi viridi, supra medium uni-geniculato (in frondibus pinnatis usque subbipin-
natis), paleis brunneis lineari-lanceolatis basi rotunda peltati-fixis margine varie fimb-
riatis sparse vestito; lamina stipite longiore, bipinnata aut subb ipinnata raro superne
simpliciter pinnata; pinnis 2—3(—7)-jugis, ,alternis vel suboppositis, oblongis, 45—
55 cm longis, 18—23 cm latis, petiolo 4—16 cm longo suffultis, basi tumidis, pinnatis vel
interdum simplicibus vel basi pinnatifidis; pinnulis plerumque 8—12-jugis, alternis vel
suboppositis, patentibus, 8—18 cm longis, medio 1.5—3cm latis, lanceolatis, acuminatis,
basin versus cuneatis vel late cuneatis, breviter petiolatis, pinnula terminali confomi
paulo majore, petiolulata, hasi baud in alas decurrente, margine serrulatis; venis utrin-
quo distinctis, patentibus, simplicibus vel furcatis, prope marginem curvatis; pagina
frondis textura in sicco virescente, chartacea, rachi, costis, costulis venisque subtus
sparsim minuteque paleaceis.  Soris breviter linearibus, 2—4 mm longis,  10—32-spo-
rangiatis, inter se separatis, a margine 2—3 mm, remotis; paraphysibus sparsis brevibusrudimentalibus.  Sporis globulosis, suparficie dense tubuculatis.
      Yunnan austro-orientalis:  Xichou Xian, Fadou, S. K. Wu 4203 (typus, PE), 4198,
8, October, 1962; ibidem, Z. R. Wang 566-1, 566-2, 566-3, 566-4, 566-5, 15, January,
1978; ibidem V. M. Chu 8212, 15, January, 1978. in valley under evergreen broad-
leaved forests, alt. 1500—1550m.
      In the tropical rain forest in southeastern Yunnan, China, the members of Angiopte-
ris Hoffm. and Archangiopteris Christ et Gies. are often growing side by side in great
abundance.  In January 1978 the second writer made a botantical trip there and col-
lected in one locality ample herbarium material of an Angiopteris, which is identical
with A. sparsisora Ching (ined.), based upon type specimens gathered by Mr. S. K. Wu
from the same locality in 1962.  To our great surprise, however, this distinct taxon
reveals a number of important morphological characteristics intermediate between An-
giopteris and Archangiopteris as diagnosed above.
      The present species resembles Archangiopteris in small build with creeping dorsi-
ventral rhizome, unigeniculate, thin, smooth stipe in pinnate to bipinnatifid fronds, spa-
ringly clad in linear-lanceolate peltately affixed scales with variously fimbriate margin,
lamina 1—2 pinnate or subbipinnate, pinnules distinctly and shortly stipitate, base
cuneate or broadly cuneate, sori of different length separated from each other by broad
spaces, and rather far away (2—3 mm) from the margin, paraphyses few, rudimentary
and short, but, on the other hand, it also similar to Angiopteris in usually bipinnate
fronds, the petiole of pinnae with swollen base (blackish upon drying), short (2—4 mm
long) linear sori consisting of 5—16 pairs of sporangia and globulax spores with densely
tubucular sporoderms.  All the above characteristics combined clearly indicate the spe-
cies is in all likelihood a natural hybrid between  Angiopteris  and Archangiopteris,
pending cytological investigation and the reason for presently placing it in Angiopteris
rather than in Archangiopteris is because of the fact that in overall impression the new
taxon appears more like the former than the latter.
Some new taxa of Nitelleae from Yunnan
Han Fu-Shan, Chen Wei-Qun
1982, 20 (3): 354-370. 
Abstract ( 0 )
 Yunnan is extends across the subtropical and tropical zones, situated in the sou-
thern border area of southwestern China.  This district is extremely rich in plants, and
thus, it has been known as a “Kingdom of Plants”.  However, up to the present our
knowledge of the Charophyta in this region has been scanty.
     In order to get a thorough understanding of its Charophyta, we identified speci-
mens collected from 13 countries or cities in this province.  The result shows that is
especially abundant in Charophyta.
     In this paper, however, only are reported new species, new varieties and new re-
cords of China on the Nitelleae.  The former two are Nitella hokouensis, N. bicornuta,
N. longicaudata, N. procera, N. brevidactyla, N. papillata, N. pseudohyalina, N. hyalina
var. aberrans and Tolypella yunnanensis; while the third is Nitella globulifera Pal and
N. japonica T. F. Allen.
Historical notes on Shui Xian—The Chinese sacred lily
Chen Sing-Chi, Wu Ying-Xiang
1982, 20 (3): 371-379. 
Abstract ( 0 )
Shui Xian, or the Chinese sacred lily, is one of the most famous ornamental flowers
in China under cultivation for a long time.  Although over a hundred years ago M.
J. Roemer had discovered this charming flower and named Narcissus tazetta L. var.
chinensis, its origin remains a puzzle up to the present day.  Some authors considered
it to be indigenous to China, while others held a contrary opinion, presuming that it is
adventitions.  However, it is generally recognized that neither argument has been con-
firmed.
      In Chinese literature, as we know, the first book that mentions the sacred lily
with a brief description is “You Yang Za Zu” by Duan Cheng-shi (?—863).  It notes:
“Nax Zhi (=the sacred lily) came from Fu Lin Guo (now Italy), the root (bulb) as
large as an egg, leaves 4—5 Chi (a unit of lenth, = 1/3 metre) long, garlic-like, scape
from the centre of the leaves with flowers on its summit; flower 6-parted, redish-white
with its centre yellowish-red, sterile; it is growing in winter and becoming dead in sum-
mer.” Though this is evidently not indicative of the plant we deal with here, but of
another breed of sacred lily, it will be seen from this citation that there was no other
plant known as Shui Xian than Nar Zhi in China during that time.  The Chinese name
Shui Xian was in fact not found in the ancient  Chinese  literature  until  the  Song
Dynasty (960—1279), a period in Chinese history leaving us no less than thirty pieces
of well-known poems on this plant, such as “Shui Xian Hum” by Lin Ban (1023—
1089), “Yin Shui Xian” by Huan Ting-jian (1045—1105) and “Fu Shui Xian Hun”
by Zhu Xi (1130—1200).  The Chinese sacred lily was very much admired in all these
poems as a very rare and curious flower, then being cultivated mainly in Hunan and
Hubei Provinces.  But, unfortunately, no wild sacred lily has been reported from these
provinces ever since.
     On the  other hand, the Chinese sacred lily has recently been found growing wild in
some places of Zhejiang and Fujian Provinces along the sea coast.  But it usually
grows as escaped plant in the places of human presence, for instance, around the temples
or houses ——a fact we gathered from field observations in Zhou Shan Islands off the east
coast of Zhejiang Province.  It must be pointed out that almost all the flowers seen
there were: nipped by the frost and, therefore, would be unable to bloom normally. Pro-
bably this is usually the case with it, for early spring, when it comes into blooms, is the
coldest season of the year there.  It is interesting to add that of all Chinese taxa of  wind
Amaryllidaceae, the Chinese sacred lily is the only member that flowers in such a cold
season. The genus Narcissus is primarily distributed in the Mediterranean region and
Central Europe with a few species extending to Iran, Afganistan and Pakistan.  None
but an entity occurs in the coast areas of Eastern Asia.  This pattern of discontinuous
distribution is apparently very rare among the angiosperms, which seems to be an
unnatural mode of dispersal.  Another important fact is its close resemblance both in
habit and flower feature to some varieties of Mediterranean N. tazetta L., to which it
belongs.  And like most of them, the Chinese sacred lily, both wild and domesticated,
is also sterile—a remarkable character usually found in long-cultivated plants.
     All the facts, as it appears to us, point to the same conclusion that the Chinese
sacred lily is an exotic plant, possibly introduced from the Mediterranean region before
the Song Dynasty.  The early history indicated that the contacts between China and
some European countries were rather frequent particularly during the Tang Dynasty.
For example, from the 17th year of Tang Zhen Guan to the 10th year of Tang Kai Yuan
(A. D. 643—723), Fu Lin Guo (now Italy) had five times dispatched envoys to China.
Since Italy had once introduced a certain sacred lily into China probably as a present
to the emperor, it is very likely that she would have exported to China in other occa-
sions another kind of sacred lily, which was subsequently called Shui (water) Xian
(celestial) by Chinese because of its beauty and water culture.
     After its being introduced, the Chinese sacred lily was perhaps first cultivated in
the imperial court and then spreaded to families of the ruling class and scholars. So far
as our knowledge goes, the first poem written in praise of Shui Xian in China is “Yong
Shui Xian Itua” by Chen Juan (?—989).  It appeared, in fact, over a hundred years
later than “You Yang Za Zu”.  And after another five hundred years or so a botani-
cal book “Ban Cao Hui Bian” by Wan Ji (1522—1566) first reported on this flower.
8o far there has been a considerable number of botanical works in China which also
include this beautiful flower. And, to-day, it has become one of the most popular orna-
mental flowers in this country, especially in the south.
      Historically, there were two places in China where Shui Xian had been grown: Ja
Ding in Jiangsu Province and Zhang Zhou in Fujian Province.  From the former,
unfortunately, nothing more is heard about the culture of this lovely flower to day.
But the latter remains the main growing centre of Shui Xian in China up to now.
Two clones are commercially propagated there, one with single flowers, and the other
with double flowers, both selling equally well in Chinese New Year festival.
The “Quan Fang Bei Zu”, a first dictionary for Chinese plants
Xu Wen-Xuan, Xiong Ruo-Li
1982, 20 (3): 380-384. 
Abstract ( 0 )
 The “Quan Fang Bei Zu”, a first dictionary for Chinese plants, which contains 27
volumes in its first collection and 31 volumes in its second collection, was completed by
Chen Jing-yi in 1253, the First Year of Bao You of Li Zong in Song Dynasty.  The
first part of this encyclopaedia of plants is devoted to flowers.  The second part is of
more varied nature, dealing with fruit trees, plants in general, herbs, trees, agriculture
and sericulture, vegetables, and medicinal herbs.  These two collections cover 267 kinds
of plants, each of which is described under two categories separately: The first category,
“Si Shi Zu” in Chinese, meaning “facts of the plants” concerned, which again divided
into 3 entries, i.e. the history, miscellaneous information and sundry bits of the plants.
The second category, “Fu Yong Zu” in Chinese, meaning poetry, which divided into
10 meters, wherein the plants are described and eulogized in poetrical expressions.
     Later on, the “Quan Fang Bei Zu” was used as a blueprint for some famous books
in China, for example, the “Qun Fang Pu” and the “Guang Qun Fang Pu” all written
and compiled after its model.  It is known today that in China there are only two
extant hand writting copies of it, one in Beijing Library, the other in the Library of
Yunnan University.  Both of them are listed as the best national books. Outside China,
it is known that a third copy of is in the Congress Library in U.S.A.  As for the ori-
ginal wood-carving copy printed during the period of the Song Dynasty, it is known so
far that one copy is kept in the Library of Culture Ministry of Japan.  The Beijing
Agriculture Publishing House has made a decision to photograph this carved copy in
the Culture Ministry of Japan as one of the “Precious Series of China Agriculture
Science”.  The book plays a very important role in the study of chinese botany, agri-
culture science, medicine, history and literature.