Academic resource collaborative recommendation algorithm based on content correlation

doi:10.7523/j.issn.1002-1175.2013.01.018

Abstract

Abstract:

We propose an academic resource collaborative recommendation algorithm by analyzing Web log to find learner's intention and mining content correlation to match interest. Experiments show that there is no significant difference in coverage between our algorithm and the existing method. The accuracy is improved by 5.13% and the response time reduces to 1/9. The accuracy is improved by 6.73% when the training/test ratio is less than 50%.

Key words: academic resource recommendation, collaborative filtering, content correlation

CLC Number:

TP311.13

ZHOU Jia, LUO Tie-Jian. Academic resource collaborative recommendation algorithm based on content correlation[J]. , 2013, 30(1): 117-123.

References

[1] Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A. Toward the next generation of recommender systesm: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2005,17(6):734-749.

[2] Ge M, Delgado-Battenfeld C, Jannach D. Beyond accuracy: evaluating recommender system by coverage and serendipity[C]//Proceeding of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 2010: 257-160.

[3] Baeza-Yates R, Ribeiro-Neto B. Modern information retrieval[M]. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co, 1999.

[4] Shardanand U, Maes P. Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating "Word of Mouth"[C]//Proc of the Conf on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 1995:210-217.

[5] Hill W, Stead L, Rosenstein M, et al. Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use[C]//Proc of the Conf on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 1995: 194-201.

[6] Billsus D, Pazzani M. User modeling for adaptive news access[J]. User Modeling and User-Adapter Interaction, 2000, 10(2/3):147-180.

[7] Melville P, Mooney R, Nagarajan R. Content-boosted collaborative filtering for improved recommendation[C]//Proceeding of the 18th National Conf on Artificial Intelligence Menlo Park: American Association for Artificial Intelligence. 2002: 187-192.

[8] Ansari A, Essegaier S, kohli R. Internet recommendations system[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2000, 37(3):363-375.

[9] Luis M de Campos, Juan M Fernández-Luna, Juan F Huete, et al. Combining content-based nad collaborative recommendations: A hybrid approach based on Bayesian networks[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2010, 51(7): 758-799.

[10] Melville P,Mooney R J, Nagarajan R. Content-boosted collaborative filtering for improved recommendations[C]//Proc 18th Nat’l Conf Artificial Intelligence. 2002:187-192.

[11] Chen L H. Enhancement of student learning performance using personalized diagnosis and remedial learning system[J]. Computers & Education, 2011, 56(1): 289-299.

[12] Klašnja-Milicevic A, Vesin B, Ivanovic M, et al. E-learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification[J]. Computers & Education, 2011, 56(3): 885-899.

[13] Cacheda F, Carneiro V, Ferna'ndez D. Comparison of collaborative filtering algorithms: Limitations of current techniques and proposals for scalable, high-performance recommender systems[J]. ACM Transactions on the Web, 2011, 5(1):2.

[14] Zhou J, Luo T J. Modeling learners and contents in academic-oriented recommendation framework[C]//IEEE International Conference on Social Computing and its Applications. 2011.

[15] Sarwar B, Karypis G, Konstan J. Analysis of recommendation algorithms for e-commerce[C]//2^nd Proceedings of the ACM E-Commerce. 2000: 158-167.

[16] Sarwar B, Karypis G, Konstan J, et al. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms[C]//WWW Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web. 2001, 1(3):285-295.

[17] Breese J S, Heckerman D, Kadie C. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering[C]//Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 1998: 43-52.