Classification of the ture entangled state of 2×5×5 pure systems

doi:10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2009.3.003

Abstract

Abstract:

We fully classify the quantum pure state of 2×5×5 system under stochastic local operations and classical communication. We find all together 34 inequivalent classes, 3 of which have non-local parameters. One of them has two non-local parameters, and the other two have only one. The parameters are not completely arbitrary. We find that the parameters have some symmetry properties, and there is a D₃ symmetry for the case of one parameter.

Key words: quantum entanglement, classification, multiparite

CLC Number:

O413

CHENG Shuo, LI Jun-Li, QIAO Cong-Feng. Classification of the ture entangled state of 2×5×5 pure systems[J]. , 2009, 26(3): 303-309.

References

[1] Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys Rev, 1935, 47(10): 777~780

[2] Schrodinger E. Die gegenwartige situation in der quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften, 1935, 23: 807, 823, 844

[3] Charles H Bennett, Gilles Brassard, Claude Crépeau, et al.Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys Rev Lett, 1993, 70(13): 1895~1899

[4] Jozsa R, Linden N. On the role of entanglement in quantum computational speed-up. Proc Roy Soc Lond A, 2003, 459(2036): 2011~2032

[5] Ding SC, Jin Z. Review on the study of entanglement in quantum computation speedup. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2007, 52(16): 2161~2166

[6] Nielsen MA, Chuang IL. Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004

[7] Wang C, Deng FG, Long GL. Multi-step quantum secure direct communication using multi-particle Green-Horne-Zeilinger state. Optics Communications, 2005, 253(1-3): 15~20

[8] Bennett CH,Wiesner SJ. Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states. Phys Rev Lett, 1992, 69(20): 2881~2884

[9] Dür W, Vidal G, Cirac JI. Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways. Phys Rev A, 2000, 62(6): 062314

[10] Verstraete F, Dehaene J, De Moor B, et al. Four qubits can be entangled in nine different ways. Phys Rev A, 2002, 65(5): 052112

[11] Lamata L, Len J, Salgado D, et al. Inductive entanglement classification of four qubits under stochastic local operations and classical communication. Phys Rev A, 2007, 75(2): 022318

[12] Chen L, Chen YX. Range criterion and classification of true entanglement in a 2×M×N system. Phys Rev A, 2006, 73(5): 052310

[13] Chen L, Chen YX, Mei YX. Classification of multipartite entanglement containing infinitely many kinds of states. Phys Rev A, 2006, 74(5): 052331

[14] Yang XG, Wang ZX, Wang XH, et al. Classification of bipartite and tripartite qutrit entanglement under SLOCC. Commun Theor Phys, 2008, 50(3): 651~654

[15] Gao XH, Albeverio Sergio, Chen K, et al. Entanglement of formation and concurrence for mixed states. Front Comput Sci China, 2008,2(2):114~128

[16] Cheng S, Li JL, Qiao CF. Classification of the entangled States of 2×N×N. arXiv:0804.2291