Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences >
Classification of the ture entangled state of 2×5×5 pure systems
Received date: 2008-11-28
Revised date: 2009-02-16
Online published: 2009-05-15
We fully classify the quantum pure state of 2×5×5 system under stochastic local operations and classical communication. We find all together 34 inequivalent classes, 3 of which have non-local parameters. One of them has two non-local parameters, and the other two have only one. The parameters are not completely arbitrary. We find that the parameters have some symmetry properties, and there is a D3 symmetry for the case of one parameter.
Key words： quantum entanglement; classification; multiparite
CHENG Shuo , LI Jun-Li , QIAO Cong-Feng . Classification of the ture entangled state of 2×5×5 pure systems[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2009 , 26(3) : 303 -309 . DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2009.3.003
[1] Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys Rev, 1935, 47(10): 777~780
[2] Schrodinger E. Die gegenwartige situation in der quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften, 1935, 23: 807, 823, 844
[3] Charles H Bennett, Gilles Brassard, Claude Crépeau, et al.Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys Rev Lett, 1993, 70(13): 1895~1899
[4] Jozsa R, Linden N. On the role of entanglement in quantum computational speed-up. Proc Roy Soc Lond A, 2003, 459(2036): 2011~2032
[5] Ding SC, Jin Z. Review on the study of entanglement in quantum computation speedup. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2007, 52(16): 2161~2166
[6] Nielsen MA, Chuang IL. Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004
[7] Wang C, Deng FG, Long GL. Multi-step quantum secure direct communication using multi-particle Green-Horne-Zeilinger state. Optics Communications, 2005, 253(1-3): 15~20
[8] Bennett CH,Wiesner SJ. Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states. Phys Rev Lett, 1992, 69(20): 2881~2884
[9] Dür W, Vidal G, Cirac JI. Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways. Phys Rev A, 2000, 62(6): 062314
[10] Verstraete F, Dehaene J, De Moor B, et al. Four qubits can be entangled in nine different ways. Phys Rev A, 2002, 65(5): 052112
[11] Lamata L, Len J, Salgado D, et al. Inductive entanglement classification of four qubits under stochastic local operations and classical communication. Phys Rev A, 2007, 75(2): 022318
[12] Chen L, Chen YX. Range criterion and classification of true entanglement in a 2×M×N system. Phys Rev A, 2006, 73(5): 052310
[13] Chen L, Chen YX, Mei YX. Classification of multipartite entanglement containing infinitely many kinds of states. Phys Rev A, 2006, 74(5): 052331
[14] Yang XG, Wang ZX, Wang XH, et al. Classification of bipartite and tripartite qutrit entanglement under SLOCC. Commun Theor Phys, 2008, 50(3): 651~654
[15] Gao XH, Albeverio Sergio, Chen K, et al. Entanglement of formation and concurrence for mixed states. Front Comput Sci China, 2008,2(2):114~128
[16] Cheng S, Li JL, Qiao CF. Classification of the entangled States of 2×N×N. arXiv:0804.2291
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |