欢迎访问中国科学院大学学报,今天是

中国科学院大学学报 ›› 2012, Vol. ›› Issue (3): 352-358.DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2012.3.011

• 环境科学与地理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于能值理论的生态足迹改进模型及其应用

王国刚1,3, 杨德刚2, 张新焕2, 唐宏2,3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101;
    2. 中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所, 乌鲁木齐 830011;
    3. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2010-10-28 修回日期:2011-04-27 发布日期:2012-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 王国刚
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(40971108)和中国科学院"西部博士项目"(XBBS200803)资助

Modified ecological footprint model based on emergy analysis and its application

WANG Guo-Gang1,3, YANG De-Gang2, ZHANG Xin-Huan2, TANG Hong2,3   

  1. 1. Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China;
    3. Graduate University, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2010-10-28 Revised:2011-04-27 Published:2012-05-15

摘要: 运用能值理论, 对传统生态足迹模型进行改进, 构建了改进模型. 对新疆维吾尔自治区1978—2007年生态足迹和生态承载力变化进行评价, 对模型进行了对比分析. 与传统生态足迹模型相比, 能值改进模型充分考虑了整个区域的生态足迹和承载力, 所以量化结果较大; 同时因其采用能值转换率等更稳定的指标, 在一定程度上克服了传统生态足迹模型的缺陷.

关键词: 生态足迹模型, 生态承载力, 能值理论, 生态可持续发展指数, 新疆

Abstract: We modify the ecological footprint (EF) methodology based on the theory of emergy analysis, and two modified models of ecological footprint accounting are formulated and applied to a case study in Xinjiang. The comparison between the conventional and modified EF models based on the different views of ecological production is outlined. The results of comparison show that the modified models are reasonable and feasible, although the modified and traditional EF models are quite different in some principles.

Key words: ecological footprint, ecological capacity, emergy analysis, ESI, Xinjiang

中图分类号: