近25年来国内外可持续发展研究热点追踪——基于CiteSpace的文献计量分析

doi:10.7523/j.ucas.2020.0006

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 可持续发展是一个全球性话题，也是国内外学者的研究热点。基于CNKI与WOS （Web of Science）核心数据库，利用CiteSpace软件，对1994—2018年国内外可持续发展研究热点进行追踪和分析。研究表明：1）国内外可持续发展研究热点主要集中在社会、经济、环境等多维度和多尺度研究、可持续发展能力评价、可持续发展战略和政策研究等方面，但侧重点有所不同。2）国外研究机构的合作联系比较密切，而国内研究机构的合作联系相对分散。3）国内可持续发展研究集中在宏观和中观区域尺度，而国外在社区等微观区域尺度的研究较为丰富。4）国内研究较多揭示可持续发展存在的问题，而国外研究则强调科技、信息、创新等新因素对可持续发展的推动作用。通过国内外研究热点的对比分析，提出中国可持续发展研究的未来发展方向。

关键词: 可持续发展, 文献计量, Citespace, 中国

Abstract: Sustainable development is a theme concerned worldwide and has gained much attention from both domestic and foreign research fields. Based on the core databases of CNKI and WOS (Web of Science) and CiteSpace software, this paper tracks the research hotspots of sustainable development at home and abroad from 1994 to 2018. The results showed that:1) Research hotspots in common focused on multi-dimensional and multi-scale research on resources, environment and economy, sustainability evaluation, sustainable development strategy and policy, but the emphasis and perspective were different. 2) The research cooperation among international institutions was closely linked, while the cooperation between domestic institutions was relatively scattered and independent. 3) In contrast to Chinese literature focusing more on macro and regional scales, the research literature published in English from micro perspective on communities was relatively abundant. 4) Domestic studies tended to reveal problems in sustainable development, while foreign studies emphasized the role of science and technology, information and innovation in promoting regional sustainability. The comparative analysis of research hotspots at home and abroad is expected to shed new lights on future studies concerning sustainable development in China.

Key words: sustainable development, bibliometric analysis, Citespace, China

中图分类号:

F124.5
X22

张晓平, 赵艳艳, 金凤君, 孙威. 近25年来国内外可持续发展研究热点追踪——基于CiteSpace的文献计量分析[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2022, 39(1): 55-63.

ZHANG Xiaoping, ZHAO Yanyan, JIN Fengjun, SUN Wei. Tracking hot spots of sustainable development research in domestic and foreign literature in the past twenty-five years: bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 39(1): 55-63.

参考文献

[1] Martha G R, 杨国安. 可持续发展研究方法国际进展:脆弱性分析方法与可持续生计方法比较[J]. 地理科学进展, 2003, 22(1):11-21.
[2] 牛振国, 孙桂凤. 近10年中国可持续发展研究进展与分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2007, 17(3):122-128.
[3] 李天星. 国内外可持续发展指标体系研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2013, 22(6):1085-1092.
[4] 陈晓红, 周宏浩. 城市化与生态环境关系研究热点与前沿的图谱分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(9):1171-1185.
[5] 孙威, 毛凌潇. 基于CiteSpace方法的京津冀协同发展研究演化[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(12):2378-2391.
[6] 张宸嘉, 方一平, 陈秀娟. 基于文献计量的国内可持续生计研究进展分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(9):969-982.
[7] 梁国强. 国内文献计量学综述[J]. 科技文献信息管理, 2013, 27(4):58-59, 62.
[8] 侯海燕, 刘则渊, 赫尓顿·克雷奇默, 等. 中国科学计量学国际合作网络研究[J]. 科研管理, 2009, 30(3):172-179.
[9] 李杰, 陈超美. CiteSpace科技文本挖掘及可视化[M]. 北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社, 2016:84-108, 194-206.
[10] 李强. 可持续发展概念的演变及其内涵[J]. 生态经济, 2011, 27(7):87-90.
[11] 慈福义, 陈烈. 循环经济模式的区域思考[J]. 地理科学, 2006, 26(3):273-276.
[12] 汪明峰, 宁越敏, 胡萍, 等. 生态产业园区的循环经济发展框架:以宁波化工区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2008, 28(5):624-630.
[13] 黄志烨, 李桂君, 李玉龙, 等. 基于DPSIR模型的北京市可持续发展评价[J]. 城市发展研究, 2016, 23(9):20-24.
[14] 高建华, 罗丽丽, 张文信, 等. 河南省PRED系统分析评价与可持续发展研究[J]. 人文地理, 2006, 21(6):104-107.
[15] 杨宇, 张小雷, 雷军, 等. 基于资源开发利用的区域可持续发展研究[J]. 地理科学, 2010, 30(3):363-369.
[16] 魏黎灵, 李岚彬, 林月, 等. 基于生态足迹法的闽三角城市群生态安全评价[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(12):4317-4326.
[17] 孙才志, 张智雄. 中国水生态足迹广度、深度评价及空间格局[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(21):7048-7060.
[18] 孙丽文, 王丹涪, 杜娟, 等. 基于LMDI的中国工业能源碳足迹生态压力因素分解研究[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(1):13-18.
[19] 曹志国, 赵怡晴, 袁锋, 等. 基于能值理论的中国矿业城市发展程度分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(3):56-61.
[20] 吕一河, 傅微, 李婷, 等. 区域资源环境综合承载力研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(1):130-138.
[21] 樊杰. 中国主体功能区划方案[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2):186-201.
[22] 张丽叶. 河南省现代农业可持续发展的综合效益评价[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2016, 37(10):95-100.
[23] 洪雅芳, 叶夏, 郑昆荩, 等. 福建省县域农业可持续发展水平研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017, 38(2):152-158.
[24] 杜国明, 关桐桐, 李冬梅, 等. 黑龙江省贫困村空间分布特征[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(3):149-156.
[25] 王士君, 田俊峰, 王彬燕, 等.精准扶贫视角下中国东北农村贫困地域性特征及成因[J].地理科学, 2017, 37(10):1449-1458.
[26] 黄震方, 陆林, 苏勤, 等. 新型城镇化背景下的乡村旅游发展:理论反思与困境突破[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(8):1409-1421.
[27] 李莺莉, 王灿. 新型城镇化下我国乡村旅游的生态化转型探讨[J]. 农业经济问题, 2015, 36(6):29-34, 110.
[28] 马世骏, 王如松. 社会-经济-自然复合生态系统[J]. 生态学报, 1984, 4(1):1-9.
[29] 朱诚, 姜逢清, 吴立, 等. 对全球变化背景下长三角地区城镇化发展科学问题的思考[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(4):633-645.
[30] 李鹤, 张平宇. 矿业城市经济脆弱性演变过程及应对时机选择研究:以东北三省为例[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(1):82-88.
[31] 马历, 龙花楼, 戈大专, 等. 中国农区城乡协同发展与乡村振兴途径[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(4):37-44.
[32] 张文婷, 温宗国. 资源环境约束下中国新型城镇化发展模式研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(S1):385-388.
[33] 张引, 杨庆媛, 闵婕. 重庆市新型城镇化质量与生态环境承载力耦合分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(5):817-828.
[34] 陈烈, 赵波. 论区域可持续发展战略[J]. 经济地理, 2005, 25(4):538-541.
[35] 方创琳, 周成虎, 王振波. 长江经济带城市群可持续发展战略问题与分级梯度发展重点[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(11):1398-1408.
[36] Alam M S, Paramati S R. Do oil consumption and economic growth intensify environmental degradation? Evidence from developing economies[J]. Applied Economics, 2015, 47(48):5186-5203.
[37] Azam M, Khan A Q, Zaman K, et al. Factors determining energy consumption:evidence from Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 42:1123-1131.
[38] Hatfield-Dodds S, Schandl H, Newth D, et al. Assessing global resource use and greenhouse emissions to 2050, with ambitious resource efficiency and climate mitigation policies[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 144:403-414.
[39] Olanrewaju B T, Olubusoye O E, Adenikinju A, et al. A panel data analysis of renewable energy consumption in Africa[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 140:668-679.
[40] Pukšec T, Foley A, Markovska N, et al. Life cycle to Pinch Analysis and 100% renewable energy systems in a circular economy at sustainable development of energy, water and environment systems 2017[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 108:572-577.
[41] Alongi D M. Present state and future of the world's mangrove forests[J]. Environmental Conservation, 2002, 29(3):331-349.
[42] Bawa K S, Seidler R. Natural forest management and conservation of biodiversity in tropical forests[J]. Conservation Biology, 1998, 12(1):46-55.
[43] Afionis S, Stringer L C. European Union leadership in biofuels regulation:Europe as a normative power?[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, 32:114-123.
[44] Asongu S A, Le Roux S. Enhancing ICT for inclusive human development in Sub-Saharan Africa[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 118:44-54.
[45] Cash D W, Clark W C, Alcock F, et al. Knowledge systems for sustainable development[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003, 100(14):8086-8091.
[46] Forsman H. Environmental innovations as a source of competitive advantage or vice versa?[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2013, 22(5):306-320.
[47] Castán Broto V. Urban governance and the politics of climate change[J]. World Development, 2017, 93:1-15.
[48] Bulkeley H, Castán Broto V, Maassen A. Low-carbon transitions and the reconfiguration of urban infrastructure[J]. Urban Studies, 2014, 51(7):1471-1486.
[49] Lawson H A. Empowering people, facilitating community development, and contributing to sustainable development:the social work of sport, exercise, and physical education programs[J]. Sport, Education and Society, 2005, 10(1):135-160.
[50] Li X, Yeh A G O. Modelling Sustainable urban development by the integration of constrained cellular automata and GIS[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2000, 14(2):131-152.
[51] Winz I, Brierley G, Trowsdale S. The use of system dynamics simulation in water resources management[J]. Water Resources Management, 2009, 23(7):1301-1323.
[52] Sedki A, Ouazar D. Simulation-optimization modeling for sustainable groundwater development:a Moroccan coastal aquifer case study[J]. Water Resources Management, 2011, 25(11):2855-2875.