Fractal study on the spatial structure of A-class tourist attraction system in Urumqi

doi:10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2021.03.010

Abstract

Abstract: Spatial structure of tourist attraction system has effects on spatial layout of regional infrastructures as well as the optimization and adjustment of regional spatial structure. Based on the fractal theory, this article studies the spatial structure of class-A tourist attraction system in Urumqi. Taking the Tianshan Grand Canyon (the only class-5A tourist attraction) as center to measure the aggregation dimension as well as the spatial correlation dimension based on crow distance and cow distance. This article indicates the following results:There are double fractal characteristics in the spatial structure of class-A tourist attraction system in Urumqi. In general, there is an aggregate distribution, and the distribution density decays rapidly from the center to the surrounding areas. In the evolution of the spatial structure, multi-center pattern may occur. The spatial structure of the tourist attraction system has a trend of self-organization optimization. Although there are strong traffic correlations among tourist attractions, the transportation network is not adequate enough. Based on these, the article proposes few recommendations to help shape tourism spatial network system by developing polycentric collaborative model, building theme sight-seeing spots, and creating high-quality self-driving routes.

Key words: fractal theory, tourist attraction system, spatial structure, Urumqi

CLC Number:

F592.7

ZHAO Hulan, YANG Zhaoping, SHI Hui, LIU Qin, HAN Fang, WANG Cuirong, GUO Jiaojiao. Fractal study on the spatial structure of A-class tourist attraction system in Urumqi[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 38(3): 367-373.

References

[1] Mandelbrot B B. The fractal geometry of nature[M]. New York:W H Freeman, 1982.
[2] Bölviken B, Stokke P R, Feder J, et al. The fractal nature of geochemical landscapes[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 1992, 43(2):91-109.
[3] Milne B T. Measuring the fractal geometry of landscapes[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 1988, 27(1):67-79.
[4] 刘继生,陈彦光. 城镇体系空间结构的分形维数及其测算方法[J]. 地理研究, 1999, 18(2):171-178.
[5] 陈彦光,刘继生. 城市土地利用结构和形态的定量描述:从信息熵到分数维[J]. 地理研究, 2001, 20(2):146-152.
[6] 戴学军,丁登山,许志晖,等. 旅游景区(点)系统空间结构随机聚集分形研究:以南京市旅游景区(点)系统为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(5):706-713.
[7] 戴学军,丁登山. 旅游景区(点)系统空间结构关联维数分形研究:以南京市景区(点)系统为例[J]. 资源科学, 2006, 28(1):180-185.
[8] 贺晓慧,白凯,卫海燕,等. 西安特殊时段旅游流规模分形结构特征研究:以"十一"黄金周为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2011, 34(5):858-865.
[9] 李玏,刘家明,宋涛,等. 基于聚集分形维数的旅游吸引物空间结构特征研究:以北京市为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(5):197-202.
[10] 宋涛,陈雪婷,陈才. 基于聚集分形维数的旅游地域系统空间优化研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(4):189-194.
[11] 崔大树,孙杨. 基于分形维数的湖州旅游景区系统空间结构优化研究[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(3):337-343.
[12] 刘大均,谢双玉,陈君子,等. 基于分形理论的区域旅游景区系统空间结构演化模式研究:以武汉市为例[J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(4):155-160.
[13] 胡章鸿,段七零. 基于时空距离的江苏省景区系统聚集分形演化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(9):1208-1214.
[14] Mandelbrot B B. Hong long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension[J]. Science, 1967, 156:636-638.
[15] 陈勇,艾南山. 城市结构的分形研究[J]. 地理学与国土研究, 1994, 10(4):35-41.
[16] 谢天成,覃平,谢正观. 环北部湾经济圈城镇体系结构及其分形模型研究[J]. 中国科学院研究生院学报, 2008, 25(2):185-191.
[17] 梁发超,刘诗苑,刘黎明. 基于分形理论的乡村聚落景观空间特征及演变:以厦门市为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(8):2640-2648.
[18] 芮旸,马滕,王兴,等. 山地城市旅游景区空间结构分形研究:以安康市为例[J]. 山地学报, 2018, 36(4):607-616.