Characteristics of high technology manufacturing industry migration based on micro enterprise data: a case study of Beijing metropolitan area

doi:10.7523/j.ucas.2023.047

Abstract

Abstract: This study traces the migration process of key high-tech enterprises in Beijing during 2008-2016, revealing the migration characteristics and patterns of high-tech enterprises within the metropolitan area. The results show that medium-sized enterprises are more likely to relocate than small and large enterprises, especially in lucrative sectors. Moreover, migration is mainly within agglomerations, with relatively little migration across agglomerations and between agglomerations and non-agglomerations, although this varies between agglomerations. Finally, most high-tech manufacturing firms first relocate between 7 and 16 years after their establishment, which means that there is roughly a 7-year adaptation or development period for firms in a region after their establishment. During the adaptation period, companies do not tend to relocate, after which, as they grow, they need to find new spaces to grow. For reasons such as familiarity with the environment, enterprises give priority to finding new locations within the agglomeration and the surrounding area.

Key words: enterprise relocation characteristics, life circle, runs test, high-tech industries, Beijing

CLC Number:

TU984

ZHANG Peiyuan, LI Jiaming, ZHANG Wenzhong. Characteristics of high technology manufacturing industry migration based on micro enterprise data: a case study of Beijing metropolitan area[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2025, 42(1): 50-60.

References

[1] Pellenbarg P H, Wissen L, Dijk J V. Firm relocation: state of the art and research prospects[J]. Research Report, 2002.
[2] Bagchi-Sen S. The dynamics of industrial location: the factory, the firm and the production system by Hayter R[J]. Economic Geography, 2001, 77(1): 77-79. DOI: 10.2307/3594090.
[3] Krugman P R. Geography and trade[M]. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press, 1991.
[4] 赵建吉, 茹乐峰, 段小微, 等. 产业转移的经济地理学研究: 进展与展望[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(1): 1-6. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2014.01.020.
[5] Lewis W A. The evolution of the international economic order[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978. DOI: 10.1515/9781400868513.
[6] 胡俊文. 国际产业转移的基本规律及变化趋势[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2004(5): 56-60. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0594.2004.03.003.
[7] 戴宏伟. 国际产业转移的新趋势及对我国的启示[J]. 国际贸易, 2007(2): 45-49. DOI: 10.14114/j.cnki.itrade.2007.02.009.
[8] 司文, 陈璐, 郑仪. 新冠疫情对全球产业格局调整的影响[J]. 国际研究参考, 2020(11): 1-7.
[9] 岳圣淞. 第五次国际产业转移中的中国与东南亚: 比较优势与政策选择[J]. 东南亚研究, 2021(4): 124-149, 154. DOI: 10.19561/j.cnki.sas.2021.04.124.
[10] 赵宏图. 从国际产业转移视角看“一带一路”: “一带一路”倡议的经济性与国际性[J]. 现代国际关系, 2019(3): 38-45, 64.
[11] 张公嵬. 我国产业集聚的变迁与产业转移的可行性研究[J]. 经济地理, 2010, 30(10): 1670-1674, 1687. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2010.10.024.
[12] 陈建军. 中国现阶段的产业区域转移及其动力机制[J]. 中国工业经济, 2002(8): 37-44. DOI: 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2002.08.005.
[13] 樊新生, 李小建. 中国工业产业空间转移及中部地区发展对策研究[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2004, 20(2): 64-68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0504.2004.02.016.
[14] 雒海潮, 苗长虹, 李国梁. 不同区域尺度产业转移实证研究及相关论争综述[J]. 人文地理, 2014, 29(1): 1-8. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2014.01.013.
[15] 刘红光, 王云平, 季璐. 中国区域间产业转移特征、机理与模式研究[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(1): 102-107. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8462.2014.01.016.
[16] 孙翊, 熊文, 王铮. 中国高技术产业空间转移的政策问题研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010, 31(11): 163-168.
[17] 高菠阳, 李俊玮, 刘红光. 中国电子信息产业转移特征及驱动因素: 基于区域间投入产出表分析[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(10): 103-109. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.10.015.
[18] 李娅, 伏润民. 为什么东部产业不向西部转移: 基于空间经济理论的解释[J]. 世界经济, 2010, 33(8): 59-71. DOI: 10.19985/j.cnki.cassjwe.2010.08.005.
[19] 冯健, 周一星. 中国城市内部空间结构研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2003, 22(3): 304-315. DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2003.03.010.
[20] 周一星. 北京的郊区化及引发的思考[J]. 地理科学, 1996, 16(3): 198-206. DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.1996.03.002.
[21] 张晓平, 孙磊. 北京市制造业空间格局演化及影响因子分析[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(10): 1308-1316.
[22] 王丹, 方斌, 陈正富. 基于社区尺度的互联网企业空间格局与演化: 以扬州市区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(6): 133-141. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2018.06.017.
[23] Rossi F, Dej M. Where do firms relocate? Location optimisation within and between Polish metropolitan areas[J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 2020, 64(3): 615-640. DOI: 10.1007/s00168-019-00948-5.
[24] 郭杰, 杨永春, 冷炳荣. 1949年以来中国西部大城市制造业企业迁移特征、模式及机制: 以兰州市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(10): 1872-1886.
[25] 张筱娟, 徐维祥, 黄明均, 等. 制造业企业的迁移特征、机制及其绩效: 以杭州市为例[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(6): 136-146. DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.06.015.
[26] Bodenmann B R, Axhausen K W. Destination choice for relocating firms: a discrete choice model for the St. Gallen region, Switzerland[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2012, 91(2): 319-341. DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00389.x.
[27] 李俊峰, 陶世杰, 高凌宇. 跨江发展下杭州市企业迁移空间模式及影响机制[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(1): 87-96. DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.01.010.
[28] Dej M, Jarczewski W, Chlebicki M. Relocation of economic activity within major metropolitan areas in poland: scale and key characteristics[M]//Capik P, Dej M. Relocation of Economic Activity. Cham: Springer, 2019: 87-108.10.1007/978-3-319-92282-9_6.
[29] 赵莉. 京津冀协同发展背景下北京市属企业迁移的政策需求分析[J]. 新视野, 2020(1): 73-80.
[30] 李佳洺. 城市空间分析与区位政策: 以北京、杭州为例[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社·当代世界出版分社, 2018.
[31] 陈艳莹, 田高峰, 王丽. 中国制造企业规模分布的演化特征: 产业生命周期视角的研究[J]. 产业经济评论(山东), 2013(2): 100-116.
[32] 唐跃军, 宋渊洋. 中国企业规模与年龄对企业成长的影响: 来自制造业上市公司的面板数据[J]. 产业经济研究, 2008(6): 28-35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9301.2008.06.005.
[33] Booth A L. Private sector training and graduate earnings[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1993, 75(1): 164. DOI: 10.2307/2109642.
[34] “中国企业寿命测算方法及实证研究”课题组, 何平. 企业寿命测度的理论和实践[J]. 统计研究, 2008, 25(4): 20-32. DOI: 10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2008.04.005.
[35] Adizes I. Corporate lifecycles: how and why corporations grow and die and what to do about it[M]. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1988.